User talk:Seahorseruler

Hi

Hey Seahorse! I'm a rollback here, so feel free to ask me about wikipedia stuff :) And also, if you look at my contributions, you can tell that there is a VERY high amount of vandalism, so clean-up is one of the most helpful things you can do! Have a great time, Alxeedo TALK

A note on warnings and edit summaries when vandal fighting

Not going to argue one way or another on giving you rollback, but I should note that level 1 warnings are only for cases where good faith is legitimately assumed. If the vandalism is obvious, it's okay to start at level 2 (no faith assumed) or even level 3 (bad faith assumed) for egregious cases. Starting at level 1 no matter the degree of offense makes it take longer to block egregious but sporadic offenders.
Similarly, you've been using the Twinkle rollback option for vandalism in a number of cases where the edits aren't clearly vandalism. If you use rollback the same way, you'll probably lose it; unless the edit is clearly vandalism, you should be using the green Rollback (AGF) or plain blue Rollback (no faith assumed) options and providing an edit summary. If you get rollback, it would be a shame to lose it for misuse. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 20:48, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As an example, I think you could legitimately jump straight to level 2 (or level 3 if you're particularly unforgiving) when warning the user responsible for this edit. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 20:51, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your sig..

..is missing here. :) --Jargon ^๏̯͡๏) 22:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Users removing comments from talk pages

You might find WP:DRC of interest. It was a surprise to me. William Avery (talk) 18:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Per your request, I've granted you rollback rights. Just a few things to remember:

Rollback is only for blatant vandalism (though you can use it for self reverts if you screw up!)
Rollback does not give you any advanced status
Misuse or abuse can lead to its removal by any administrator

You might also like to take a look at WP:RBK and Help:Reverting to get to know the technical side and you can run tests with it at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. If you have any questions, just ping my talk page. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:24, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting vandalism

Thank you for this! – ukexpat (talk) 20:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of most common surnames in Europe

Why do we have to put Turkey, Armenia and Georgia as part of Europe. They are clearly part of Asia ? Check here List of most common surnames in Asia the information is there. It is not deleted at all. Zarzu (talk) 23:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vantalising

Iam the author of the article and wanted it deleted.. Iam not a vandal .. Please take your warning back! WhiteAgent (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"List of districts in India"

Hi,

I was not vandalizing that page. A previous editor had copy-pasted one of the tables multiple times, so I was deleting the duplicate tables. Someone else already gave me a warning, but then realized it was in error, as you can see on my talk page. Thanks, 173.72.137.168 (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Oh hai, you're the Seahorseruler from Wikia, right? Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Yep, I'm bored and tired, so I came here XD I'm gonna get off soon to go to bed. See ya tomorrow hopefully on Wikia! --Alxeedo TALK 04:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Sea!

Hey Sea! This is Bark from the CPW, the CPFW, and the many other wikis I'm found in (sad, huh?)-- Barkjon complaints here! 17:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darwen Pool Association

A creating editor's continued addition of content to an article tagged for speedy deletion does not constitute vandalism: no speedy deletion tags were removed; the article is simply still being developed. Reverting this - and claiming that you were removing vandalism - was inappropriate, and I have restored their code. I think you should also remove the final warning you also let the editor. I42 (talk) 19:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Their subsequent removal of speedy deletion tags, and 3RR violations on Darwen, are another matter, of course. I42 (talk) 19:55, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Shop Rite-logo-new.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shop Rite-logo-new.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —mono 01:50, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey Sea, It's Sk8r from the CPW. What's up? I'm sorry that I haven't been editing on the CPW, but I have been editing here. --Sk8rSoda (talk) 19:23, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sea, I'm really sorry

I'm seriusly sorry for all the rude thing I've sended you please accept this apology. Also, there is no more Club Penguin-User Wiki (proof:Search it in Central), but there is now a songpedia. --Mvtech^Alone! 04:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great job

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for patrolling recent changes! Your work is much appreciated :D Netalarm^talk 03:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you so much! It is greatly appreciated :) --Seahorseruler ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs) (Report a Vandal)} 03:37, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fred West

Please take care with Huggle; West is dead, so WP:BLP doesn't apply, and I think there is no doubt that he was a serial killer and no gentleman. Thanks. Rodhull andemu 16:14, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:30, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!Drink up! Cheers! Sk8rSoda^{PENN STATE}_{NITTANY LIONS} 20:31, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]Did you see what your bot is protecting?Take a look. User:M1$CR3ANT ENJOY! Leo (talk) 03:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]BarnstarThe Original Barnstar This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.A barnstar for you!The Editor's Barnstar You are a great editor. :) Prof geniusash (talk) 14:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Hello, Seahorseruler!Hi, you may know me as MassiveSodaDuck from Wikia, who edits at the Yoshi Wiki and other wikis. Cool that you have rollback rights here. Here, take this barnstar.I hereby award this barnstar for being a good user. ⁄MSD⁄ (talk) 02:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]173.219.62.88173.219.62.88 has been blocked for 31 hours.[1]. Is there some way that I can watch this IP so that any new edit shows up on my watchlist? --Guy Macon (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]cvn-wp-ptHi, Seahorseruler. I've reported a problem on your page on Meta on February. I'm not sure if you saw that so I'm leaving a link here. When you have time, please take a look. Thank you.‴ T_eLeS (T_{@ L C S}) 04:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Yoshi WikiThis is MassiveSodaDuck from WIkia. The guy who adopted the Yoshi Wiki after you left gave me bureaucrat rights there, and I have gotten the page count to 135+ pages, have edited the MediaWiki to make the wiki look nicer and make improvements, and some other stuff you may like. I'd like you to check it out. Here's a link: http://yoshi.wikia.com/wiki/Yoshi_Wiki ⁄MSD⁄ (talk) 21:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]An AFD you participated in has been started againI'm contacting everyone that participated in the last one, which ended earlier this month, to inform them of the new one. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aziz Shavershian (2nd nomination) Dream Focus 13:43, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]HiHi there, just dropping by to say hi! (P.S. In case you don't know, I am Dps04 :P) --Tingo Chu (talk) 13:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]#cvn-zh-scanHi Seahorseruler, I noticed that your bots are down and no longer stays in #cvn-zh-scan. It has been a wonderful resource for us, so may I know if it'll be back online some time? Thanks & Regards, --Ben.MQ (talk) 09:58, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]