Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bheemsinh (talk | contribs) at 07:42, 12 June 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Reviewer/Article Feedback Reviewer

(add requestview requests)


User:Mrfrobinson

Would like to expand some of the work I do at WP:AfC into the established main space. I have a good history of non-problematic editing and a willingness to help! Mike (talk) 16:59, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) The reviewer flag has got nothing to do with WP:AFC. This permission you are asking for by no means helps one review AfC submissions; this permission only allows you to review pending changes on PC-protected pages. smtchahaltalk 04:37, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I must agree with Smtchahal above. For more information on what the Reviewer flag does, I recommend you visit WP:REVIEWER. Regards, smileguy91talk 16:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done See the above comments. If you're still interested, I would suggest asking for this right again when you're a bit more experienced, and have fimiliarized yourself with Wikipedia:Reviewing. INeverCry 02:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Surfer43

I would like to help review pages on Wikipedia. I am familiar with the basic content policies, legal policies, and the guidline on reviewing. I have access to STiki and have used it over 650 times. I also have rollback rights. Surfer43 (talk) 02:11, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 02:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Marcnut1996

I dislike vandalism across Wikipedia and I will revert vandalism if I ever see them, in addition to Wikipedia's vandalism policies. Also, I constantly add citations because I know uncited content will be removed. I know uncited contents are removed because there is no evidence to back it up. Marcnut1996 (talk) 06:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I don't see any indication in your editing history that you have experience with reverting vandalism, etc. See Wikipedia:Reviewing. Please come back and ask for this right again when you've built up some experience with fighting vandalism. INeverCry 02:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tikuko

I keep seeing these pending changes alerts as I browse recent changes for vandalism my computer's too slow to catch, and I would love to be able to help take care of them. I have been actively using both the Twinkle and Page Curation tools for a month and when issues were brought up regarding my edits with Page Curation, I took the other editors' concerns to heart and modified my behavior. TKK bark ! 22:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 02:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:GoingBatty

Looking for other ways to contribute to Wikipedia, and I believe I have the experience to know the difference between vandalism, good faith edits that don't meet our guidelines, and edits that improve an article. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 01:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 01:50, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dantheman4297

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Dantheman4297 (talk) 07:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm looking for other ways to contribute to Wikipedia, as I believe I can differentiate between vandalism and edits done with good faith. I also believe I have reasonable knowledge of where I will be contributing, knowing what is factual and what isn't.

Dantheman4297 (talk) 07:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I don't see any experience with handling vandalism. Please get more experience and apply again in the future. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lee Tru.

I am requesting this right as a Wikipedia:Teahouse host, a member of the CVU, GOCE, New Page patrol, and as the director of PSI WikiProject The large amount of User spage edits are from the fact that I am: doing two projects in my sandbox, welcoming new users, and taking an adopt-a-user and CVUA course. Thus Spake Lee Tru. 14:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) A bit more anti-vandalism efforts would be appropriate, in my opinion. But I'm not an admin, so this isn't my decision. smileguy91talk 16:50, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) 121 edits to article space only is not enough for reviewer permissions, get at least 500 edits on article space. Best let the admins decide --PrabashWhat? 04:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, I drop my request. -- Thus Spake Lee Tru. 10:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Soroush90gh

I want to be a reviewer in WP because I'm interested in evaluating articles. I'm an active member of English WP and I guess this right will make me even more keen to help developing of WP. Soroush90gh (talk) 20:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bheemsinh

I'd like to contribute to Wikipedia by create, update and review the contents. I'm very much familier with the wikipedia basic content policies, legal issues and guidelines, and review policies. Bheemsinh (talk) 07:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]