Jump to content

Talk:Levi's Stadium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 177.43.72.251 (talk) at 01:24, 14 June 2013 (Construction (section) in article: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Reassessment

I've reassessed the article as meeting the Start-class guidelines. It is, however, pretty close to a B-class article.

The problems that I saw: The "Stadium Design" section uses an odd mix of tenses, including "was" and "will". It is also very unclear if this was only the design for the new (2006?) San Francisco stadium, or might also be recycled to used for the Santa Clara stadium design. [Also: Was there a different design intended for the 1997 version?]

Also: The "2006 plan" section looks to me if it is really two plans, the initial San Francisco plan, and the later Santa Clara plan.

If these issues are cleared up, the article should be ready for a B-class rating. BlankVerse 06:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted this article to have an emphasis on the 2006 plan and the current slated stadium design, yet also provide a historical perspective on the 49ers' need for a new stadium by discussing the 1997 initiative. Do you have any ideas on how that could be structured better? -- ßίζ·קּ‼ (talk | contribs) 02:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Section "Monster Park is obsolete"

There is some bias and unsourced information in this small section of the article that needs to be addressed.

It is obsolete. It is basically a baseball stadium with a football field. Seatings along what used to be the right foul line are now blocked by the east grandstand for football games as well as steel beams supporting the upper deck obstructing sight lines of seats on the lower deck.

It is also the oldest stadium in the NFL that has not been renovated or replaced. Heck, even Soldier Field and Lambeau Field, stadiums that are older than Monster Park, have been renovated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.246.84.57 (talk) 08:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


As of November 2007 this article is completely inaccurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.28.234 (talk) 03:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Is the old age of the stadium really the reason why the 49ers are worth half what the Reskins are worth? Somehow, it seems like other factors might have more to do with it. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 17:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - I'm going to remove that unsupported assertion. SixFourThree (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2010 (UTC)SixFourThree[reply]

Move request

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

{{movereq|New 49ers stadium}}

Proposed new 49ers stadiumNew 49ers stadium — This has been used much more often than "Proposed new 49ers stadium". Relisted. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 11:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC) --67.180.161.183(talk)14:41, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Construction (section) in article

Baseball Buggs: Please do not reintroduce the "Construction" section in the article without first correcting the problems. The edit does not meet WP guidelines for several reasons. These include: notability; paragraph and section form; use of external links in the article, and proper formatting for inline referencing of material. All of these guidelines are available to you. Please consider using the Help section (to the left), the MOS, or even the Help Desk if you need assistance in meeting the basic requirements for adding to the article content. 177.43.72.251 (talk) 01:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]