Talk:Robinson R44
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robinson R44 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Aviation: Aircraft / Rotorcraft Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I disagree with this article being classed as a stub. It contains a lot of information for this type of article. --GW_Simulations 19:53, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- reclassed as Start-Class. --Born2flie 03:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
File:ROBINSON R44 HELICOPTER.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:ROBINSON R44 HELICOPTER.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:00, 28 August 2011 (UTC) |
Recomended grounding of certain models in Australia
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-05/unsafe-robinson-helicopters-to-be-grounded/4611458 if someone is interested in including? TinTin (talk) 03:51, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
What's the issue with a table
It's concise and well-referenced, and shows at a glance how the R44 accidents in Australia compare with others. Looking forward to hearing from the folks that feel so strongly about this that they are reverting my other changes too. Socrates2008 (Talk) 08:34, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- I recently tweaked the accidents and incidents section as it clearly was unbalanced, Bilcat just reverted it back to this more "balanced" version. The table doesnt add anything and the relevant info is still in the article text. MilborneOne (talk) 09:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Could you please elaborate what's "clearly unbalanced"/ Bilcat's edit summary did not match what he reverted as he removed more than the table that his edit summary indicated. Socrates2008 (Talk) 09:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC)