Talk:Robinson R44

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robinson R44 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft / Rotorcraft Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

I disagree with this article being classed as a stub. It contains a lot of information for this type of article. --GW_Simulations 19:53, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reclassed as Start-Class. --Born2flie 03:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:ROBINSON R44 HELICOPTER.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:ROBINSON R44 HELICOPTER.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:00, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recomended grounding of certain models in Australia

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-05/unsafe-robinson-helicopters-to-be-grounded/4611458 if someone is interested in including? TinTin (talk) 03:51, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's the issue with a table

It's concise and well-referenced, and shows at a glance how the R44 accidents in Australia compare with others. Looking forward to hearing from the folks that feel so strongly about this that they are reverting my other changes too. Socrates2008 (Talk) 08:34, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I recently tweaked the accidents and incidents section as it clearly was unbalanced, Bilcat just reverted it back to this more "balanced" version. The table doesnt add anything and the relevant info is still in the article text. MilborneOne (talk) 09:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please elaborate what's "clearly unbalanced"/ Bilcat's edit summary did not match what he reverted as he removed more than the table that his edit summary indicated. Socrates2008 (Talk) 09:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]