Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Rollback
- Jfmantis · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I've been reverting vandalism on Wikipedia for over a year, using mostly Twinkle and, more recently, STiki, and I'd like to have the flexibility afforded by rollback. Jfmantis (talk) 02:31, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Carbon6 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- I often create articles using the AfC feature. It always ends up creating unnecessary redirect pages. I get rid of them using Twinkle, but I think rollback would be easier. Also, it would be nice to use for bots that make unconstructive edits. Thanks, Carbon6 (talk) 02:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Not done. This isn't what Rollback is for and with only 66 edits to mainspace I don't think you have sufficient editing experience anyway. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU and when you have made 200 or so edits you may wish to enroll at the WP:CVUA to learn more. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:34, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Odysseus1479 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c)
- Fighting vandalism is not a principal focus of mine, but a few of the articles in my watchlist are fairly frequent targets; manually undoing a string of unproductive edits can be somewhat tedious and susceptible to copy-paste errors.—Odysseus1479 07:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)