I am regularly on Wikipedia either for creating pages, editing them or finding out about them. I also strive to revert all vandalism as much as I can. I regularly edit Gymnastics articles as I know a lot about them, thanks. -Theworldgymnast1 (talk) 20:02, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have once again applied to become a reviewer in wikipedia. I was rejected due to less edits in the mainspace. The administrator asked me to perform atleast 100 mainspace edits in order to become a reviewer. I have worked hard and in very less time i have achieved that. I request the administrators to please this time consider my request as i want to fight vandalism and help wikipedia by removing vandalism to a greater extent. I just want one and only chance to prove myself. Param Mudgal (talk) 12:13, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - 193 edits, among them 105 to articles is very few, cross at least 500 mainspace edits, use Twinkle to fight vandalism. Read this policy - Wikipedia:Vandalism. Make few reverts that show you have a fair grasp of the policy and learn distinguish between bad-faith and good-faith edits. Finally enroll at WP:CVUA, when you pass then you can apply again. This is not the correct time in my opinion. Soham12:57, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I accept your opinion but in very less time i have tried to give my fullest contributions to wikipedia. I want one chance so that i can help wikipedia fight vandalism fullfill my responsibility as reviewer. I think that time period and experience is not always necessary in evaluating any person. Fresh people should also be given that opportunity. You are a senior editor and i respect your opinion and other editors and administrators opinion.--Param Mudgal (talk) 18:04, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am not withdrawing . I am just asking for one chance to work well for wikipedia community and i am considering myself that i can become a good and better reviewer. And Please don't add more comments here . This is not a debate page. You can talk to me through my talk page.--Param Mudgal (talk) 18:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Often while patrolling for vandalism, I come across pages with Pending Revisions. I can undo the vandalism, but then my edit stays as pending evaluation too, which defeats the purpose as well as making work for another. If I had this permission it would save steps for everyone. Per the instructions, I have read the policies on Biographies, Verifiability, Original Research, Copyrights, Neutral POV, and what Wikipedia is Not. If further evidence is needed, you can find examples of my edits to pending pages in my history, or I'd be happy to expound further. Thank you for your consideration. Electric Wombat (talk) 23:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I'm leaning heavily towards declining your request at this time and recommending that you gain some more experience first. In my review, I noticed that many of your edits are either vandalism reverts (which are always appreciated!) or changes to protection templates, such as this. I'm not seeing much that would demonstrate your understanding of this tool. Could you provide some diffs, please, is possible? Thank you. Acalamari17:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am a regular editor on Wikipedia, and have contributed to hundreds of articles for copyediting and providing accurate references. There are some pages that I have attempted to fix or revert but hit the "pending revisions" case, so I would like to have the ability to get those done. Thanks. AngusWOOF (talk) 23:59, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Unfortunately, with fewer than 20 edits, you do not have enough experience for this userright at this time. Acalamari 18:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Done I've seen that occur and I found one of your edits where that happened. Acalamari 23:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)