Jump to content

Pro-form

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EWS23 (talk | contribs) at 19:40, 8 January 2014 (link to company pro-form). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A pro-form is a type of function word or expression that stands in for (expresses the same content as) another word, phrase, clause or sentence where the meaning is recoverable from the context. They are used either to avoid repetitive expressions or in quantification (limiting the variables of a proposition).

Pro-forms are divided into several categories, according to which part of speech they substitute:

  • A pronoun substitutes a noun or a noun phrase, with or without a determiner: it, this.
  • A pro-adjective substitutes an adjective or a phrase that functions as an adjective: so as in "It is less so than we had expected."
  • A pro-adverb substitutes an adverb or a phrase that functions as an adverb: how or this way.
  • A pro-verb substitutes a verb or a verb phrase: do.
  • A pro-sentence substitutes an entire sentence or subsentence: Yes or (some have argued[1] ) that as in "That is true."

An interrogative pro-form is a pro-form that denotes the (unknown) item in question and may itself fall into any of the above categories.

One of the most salient features of many modern Indo-European languages is that relative pro-forms and interrogative pro-forms, as well as demonstrative pro-forms in some languages, have identical forms. Consider the two different functions of who in "Who's the criminal who did this?" and "Adam is the criminal who did this".

Most other language families do not have this ambiguity and neither do several ancient Indo-European languages. For example, Latin distinguishes the relative pro-forms from the interrogative pro-forms, while Ancient Greek[2] and Sanskrit distinguish between all three: relative, interrogative and demonstrative pro-forms.

Table of correlatives

L. L. Zamenhof, the inventor of Esperanto, called a table of systematic interrogative, demonstrative, and quantifier pro-forms and determiners in a language a table of correlatives, after the relative and demonstrative proforms, which function together as correlatives. The table of correlatives for English follows.

Table of correlatives
interrogative demonstrative quantifier
proximal medial distal existential elective universal negatory alternative
determiner which
what
this (sg.)
these (pl.)
that (sg.)
those (pl.)
yon (sg.)
yonder (pl.)
some any
whichever
whichsoever
every
each
all
no another
pronoun human who
whom
this (one) (sg.)
these (ones) (pl.)
that (one) (sg.)
those (ones) (pl.)
yon (one)
yonder (ones) (pl.)
someone
somebody
anyone
anybody
whoever
whomever
whosoever
whomsoever
everyone
everybody
all
no one
nobody
another
someone else
somebody else
nonhuman what this (one) (sg.)
these (ones) (pl.)
that (one) (sg.)
those (ones) (pl.)
yon (one) (sg.)
yonder (ones) (pl.)
something anything
whatever
whatsoever
everything
all
nothing something else
else
other
out of two (dual) which this one (sg.)
these (ones) (pl.)
that one (sg.)
those (ones) (pl.)
yon one (sg.)
yonder (ones) (pl.)
one either
whichever
whichsoever
both neither other
out of many (plural) some
one
any
whichever
whichsoever
each
all
none another
pro-adverb location where here there yonder somewhere anywhere
wherever
wheresoever
everywhere nowhere elsewhere
source whence
wherefrom
hence thence yence[citation needed] somewhence anywhence
whenceever
whencesoever
everywhence nowhence elsewhence
goal whither
whereto
whereinto
whereunto
hither thither yither[citation needed] somewhither anywhither
whithersoever
everywhither nowhither elsewhither
time when hen
now
then yen[citation needed] sometime anytime
whenever
whensoever
always
everywhen
never elsewhen
another time
manner how
whereby
hereby
thus
thereby yonby[citation needed]
yonderby[citation needed]
somehow anyhow
however
howsoever
everyway no way
no ways
nowise
no how (col.)
otherwise
reason why
wherefore
herefore therefore yonfore[citation needed]
yonderfore[citation needed]
somefore[citation needed]
somewhy
anyfore[citation needed]
somewhy
everyfore
everywhy
nofore[citation needed]
nowhy[citation needed]no reason
elsefore[citation needed]
elsewhy[citation needed]

Some languages may have more categories. See demonstrative.

Note that some categories are regular and some are not. They may be regular or irregular also depending on languages. The following chart shows comparison between English, French (irregular) and Japanese (regular):

  interrogative quantifier
existential negative
human who
qui
dare
someone
quelqu'un
dareka
no one
personne
daremo
nonhuman what
que
nani
something
quelque chose
nanika
nothing
rien
nanimo
location where

doko
somewhere
quelque part
dokoka
nowhere
nulle part
dokomo

(Note that "daremo", "nanimo" and "dokomo" are universal quantifiers with positive verbs.)

Some languages do not distinguish interrogative and indefinite pro-forms. In Mandarin, "Shéi yǒu wèntí?" means either "Who has a question?" or "Does anyone have a question?", depending on context.

See also

References

  1. ^ Rödl, Sebastian (2012). Categories of the Temporal. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 22–25. ISBN 978-0-674-04775-4.
  2. ^ Herbert Weir Smyth. Greek Grammar. par. 340: Correlative Pronouns.