Talk:Chicago Union Station

No Picture of Current Station

Why isn't there a single picture of the exterior of the famous current station, neither from it's early years or today? Yet, there are two pictures of the previous station which it replaced? Seems kind of strange doesn't it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.176.103.64 (talk • contribs)

There likely aren't any free photos of the old station available, or there weren't when editors went looking. I'll be in Chicago next month, so I'll try to stop over there for some current photos. Slambo (Speak) 11:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Through tracks?

This is something I was trying to figure out recently, and couldn't. Does Union Station have through tracks, or do all the tracks from both sides end? Whichever way it is, it should be mentioned in the article. --SPUI 05:28, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

There are one or two through tracks on the south end of the concourse next to the river, but the rest are all stub tracks. slambo 13:43, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

I moved a piece of criticism about run-through tracks to its own section. This actually belongs in the Amtrak article, if anyplace. Union Station configuration is not necessarily the problem with through passengers having to re-board if Chicago is not their destination. In fact it has more to do with the routes, crews, train sets, and city track division points, than anything to do with Union Station run-through tracks, or lack thereof. A train could terminate on a south side platform, then continue on from there if the actual routes were specified by Amtrak. A train could follow a route via the Western Ave. yards connector to reach lines the other side of the station, much as the Pennsylvania Panhandle route did to reach Madison St. Station. Group29 (talk) 15:16, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Image removed?

Why was the image of the grand hall removed? I'm guessing it's because the image didn't have an appropriate copyright tag on it? In a little searching, I found the image on http://www.cityofchicago.org/landmarks/U/UnionStation.html but what I couldn't find was a concise statement concerning using the image except at the bottom of that page where it says "© Copyright 2003 City of Chicago Department of Planning and Development, Landmarks Division. All Rights Reserved." Perhaps someone more familiar with that site or its maintainers can obtain official permission and mark the image as such? I've got a couple photos that I took there a couple months ago, but they aren't near as pretty as the one that was originally linked here. slambo 16:02, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

Copyright is an issue with lots of Wikipedia's architecture articles. The really good shots are copyrighted. We're counting on you! --Wetman 18:12, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Neat picture, but I'd rather see a discriptive photo than an artistic one.Cacophony 22:36, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

Chicago as railroad center

Isn't Chicago still the railroad center of the US? It's the only city where six Class I railroads meet. Could we change the first sentence of the article so that Chicago doesn't sound like it's lost that?

Info from A Guide to Chicago's Train Stations Present and Past by Ira J. Bach and Susan Wolfson

Built 1881 by consortium including PFW&C, C&A, CB&Q, CM&StP and others, headhouse was to one side of the tracks because tracks approached from both sides, designed by W. W. Boyington, two-story brick headhouse, demolished 1925 for room for trackage to new station a block to the south

construction begun 1914, designed by successor firm to Daniel H. Burnham, known as Graham, Anderson, Probst and White by completion in 1925, originally two buildings - concourse/shed and waiting room/office building, connected by tunnel under Canal Street, skylight over concourse demolished in late 1960s --SPUI (talk) 03:27, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Usage statistic from On the Bi-Level

Recently picked up a copy of On the Bi-Level, which is Metra's commuter newsletter, and it claimed that Union Station sees 126,000 passengers per day. I added the updated information. However, and I have no reason to discredit OtBL as a reliable source, but it seemed pretty high. Thoughts? Anyone have anything different? Gws57 12:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

If you go to the Metra budget section at their website, it contains the passenger load averages for all lines. Based on my calcs, there are 114,000 riders on the lines that use Union Station each day, which isn't the same as how many passengers come through the station. (I took the sum of the weekday average totals. If you exclude reverse commuters, the number is closer to 110,000.) And this is still incorrect because this would include riders who don't board at Union Station.

The only way I got 120,000 was to take the weekly (incl. Sat & Sun) totals and divide by 5, which is very incorrect. Without station level detail, it's hard to say how many passengers ride the train without going through the downtown terminal.

Why are people in suits walking on the roof?

My office overlooks the eastern side of Union Station. One of my colleagues who also overlooks the station has brought to my attention that groups of men in suits have been out walking on the rooftop practically every day. Occasionally they are accompanied by one or more women, also in suits. What in the world are they doing -- perhaps scouting for some sort of renovation or expansion project? Any insight would be greatly appreciated!!

I remember reading in the Chicago Tribune a few weeks ago that there are plans to develop a new hotel and perhaps another commercial use (I cannot remember) and that a hotel towel will be built from the center of the building. (I am somewhat surprised that they are going to do something so drastic to what is a truly beautiful landmark.) Armchairexec 16:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-CTA Bus Connections

Does anybody have any concrete evidence that other types of buses stop at Union Station besides those owned and operated by the Chicago Transit Authority? If so, please show it to me, otherwise I'll just reformat the bus connections link to indicate that it's strictly a CTA connection, and add the appropriate link. ----DanTD (talk) 17:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I've personally ridden on "Illini Express" buses (i.e., intercity) to and from Union Station before. They actually do directly serve the station (in that they pull up to the bus stand). Their website probably advertises that service, though I wouldn't want to use it as a source lest someone think you were spamming. I've seen other bus companies stop there too, but I never paid attention to which ones they were. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 18:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

As indicated on the Megabus (North America) page, the Megabus' Chicago hub is at Union Station. Also Van Galder and Greyhound Lines operate Amtrak Thruway Motorcoach service from Chicago Union Station. The service referred to in the above post is the [Lincoln Land Expresswith service from Chicago Union Station to Champaign. Homeybiz (talk) 02:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

old image

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pingnews/290626660/in/set-72157594337708238/

If anyone's interested in uploading it to commons, here's a beautiful PD image of Union Station

Intercity Train Service

This is no longer true. There is a train from Millennium Station, the South Shore Commuter, that travels between there and South Bend,IN. (see [1]) The Union Pacific North line travels from the Ogilvie Transportation Center to Kenosha,WI. (see [2]) A quick reference, the Metra system map, can be viewed at (see [3]) Click on the UP-N and the SS lines to see where they run to.

I was unsure of how best to add or change the article to reflect this. Does anyone have any suggestions? StarsTrainsAndRandomThings (talk) 00:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I converted the <ref> tags in your comment above to make the weblinks useable. Without a <references/> they're useless. :-) —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 18:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

And consequently, you're technically correct. Those trains sure do exist, and they sure do reach other cities. But in terms of the definition of Inter-city rail, I don't think they count. Metra is a commuter rail/regional rail system. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 18:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Also note, I think it might be worth clarifying that very briefly in the article. I agreed with you initially until I checked the definition of Inter-city rail, and I could see other people wondering the same, especially those from the area. Though I'm not sure how to unobtrusively do this. Maybe saying "It is the only Intercity rail terminal in Chicago, though other stations have regional rail lines that run to nearby cities"? —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 14:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Editing glitch

This is something for admins;

I clicked on the edit button for the Layout section of the article, but it took me to the editing page for Services. It's a minor glitch, but somewhat annoying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spartan S58 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Edit: None of the sections have an edit button until the Layout section, which leads to the Services editer, and then the rest of the edit buttons are halfway through the Prior Routes and Services section. REally bizarre. Spartan S58 (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Title changes

The title of this article seems to have shifted back and forth a few times. The reasons for that are not clear, at least to me. According to the 'official' sources, the name of this station is indeed Chicago Union Station (see http://www.chicagounionstation.com/index.html or http://metrarail.com/metra/en/home/maps_schedules/downtown_chicagostations/chicago_union_station.html). Perhaps the proposal to use Union Station (Chicago) instead was intended as a means to distinguish this from other Union Stations, but I don't know. If we have got it right this time, great. If I have missed something, please discuss!Hypocaustic (talk) 15:39, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

"Criticism" scrapped

Section seemed lame, and inappropriate. Prior to Amtrak, no passenger trains passed "through" Chicago, do any Amtrak routes now? All other stations also terminals, correct? This is U.S. railroad patterns, not Union Station's problem alone. First two sentences moved to "Platforms and tracks", with slight rewording, rest deleted. Refs coming.Sammy D III (talk) 17:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Contradictory passenger information

• Chicago Union Station is the 3rd busiest rail terminal in the United States, handling approximately 120,000 passengers on an average weekday...
• During World War II, Union Station was at its busiest, handling as many as 300 trains and 100,000 passengers daily...
• as of 2007, approximately 54,000 people use the station on a daily basis...

--12.165.139.33 (talk) 17:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)