Request reviewer rights. I am a primary contributor to the Ink Master genre, as well as multiple genre's of encyclopedic content periodically including the pending change feeds. I primarily use Wikipedia to contribute and research aviation topics, Ink Master related topics, Legal topics, scientific based topics, programming topics, gaming topics, computer/technology topics, and other special interest topics. I specialize in grammar, punctuality, literary usage, and composition. I know the WML fairly well and have been editing on Wikipedia for over 8 years under current user name and another that I forgot about in 2008. I also have a working knowledge regarding some of the Wikipedia rules. Throughout my researching of topics, I have learned to use the reference section well for critical topics that would need such. Kevintampa5 (talk) 02:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) As stated above, I see no need for you to have reviewer rights, most of your edits are on one article and that article is not protected. TheMesquito (talk) 01:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Primarily to review the site that I typically contribute to weekly, but I could do this for more pages than just one. The In Master Season 4 topic is semi-protected due to non-sourced and misleading edits by sock-puppets in the past. I do frequently come across other pages that have pending reviews. I use Wikipedia for almost every topic I research since the references usually lead to direct-source information so I also wish to review and pass other pages with protection to aid in the growth and accuracy of Wikipedia. I do understand you can only see what I have done on this account, and my other account I cant use for reference since I do not remember the log-in details (too many years have passed since it was used and have since forgotten about it). I know I can provide a useful service. Key in point is my knowledge of Wikipedia policies regarding biographies, legal claims and issues, as well as spotting obvious vandalism by surrounding content. In the end it is your call whether or not it is granted. Either way I appreciate the consideration.Kevintampa5 (talk) 03:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am a dedicated writer who loves writing and editing articles based on well-researched knowledge. I have completed my bachelors and masters degree and I am currently on my PhD research on Information and Communication Technology; and I love open source softwares. I am happy to have made contributions to a wikipedia article in recent time. I find wikipedia quite interesting and useful and would be happy to support it's growth and continuous development. I hereby request to be made a reviewer for wikipedia articles. I promise to make good use of the opportunity if considered to become a reviewer. Thank you. Villageboyban (talk) 15:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm an experienced editor, and often deal with articles protected with the "pending change" feature. I am an active anti-vandalism user, too. ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm an editor with over three years of experience on Wikipedia. I help fight vandalism as well as make sure information on the articles I watch is reliably sourced, up to date and conforms to Wikipedia's standards. I'm a Rollbacker as well. For anything else, see my contributions. —KirtZMessage17:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Of those 27 edits, 23 were all to the same article - Akinwunmi Ambode; three were uploads of files which have since been deleted under WP:CSD#F7; and one was to this page. I consider that this is far too little editing experience; please see points 1, 2 and 5 at Wikipedia:Reviewing#Becoming a reviewer. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Done with rollback as well given your experience with STiki. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)