User talk:152.163.100.72

Attention:

This IP address, 152.163.100.72, is registered to America Online (AOL) and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this is not the IP address of your machine. 152.163.100.72 is the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. These and other proxies are shared among thousands of AOL users. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Please note: AOL users often change IP addresses with each page they load.
Warnings or messages left on this page will not likely be received by the intended user.
Please scroll down to the bottom of this page to see the most recent messages.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 152.163.100.72). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.

Please note these points:

Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Both adding such unreasonable information and editing articles maliciously are considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Antonrojo 19:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Racism

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 02:53, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doc ^ask? 22:21, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Greg Asche (talk) 23:02, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was not vandalizing. I should be free to put down comments about Joel. That's why you have the discussion page for him. I said he's gay and people misinterpret it for vandalizing.

No, the discussion page is for discussing article contributions and improving the article according to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. --Viriditas 11:03, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

$=='''''TURDFERGUSON'''''==$

more notices

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 05:38, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Webcam

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 12:34, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

December 2005

Thanks for experimenting with the page Euclid on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. The Hooded Man 22:52, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the heads up

Thank you for the heads up. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 08:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop blanking pages or adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Winter 01:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Snargle 05:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Brian Kendrick, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Winter ^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 02:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop vandalising wikipedia and consider this a a warning for the Atlantic Modal Haplotype page.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sandwich Eater 15:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Flag of Mexico, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. (ESkog)^(Talk) 00:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

RexNL 16:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 13th, 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Brooke Hogan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Cymsdal e 00:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 20th, 2006

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Antonrojo 03:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2nd edits

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. --Ixfd64 03:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Moros i cristians was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. // Tawkerbot2 05:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 10th edits

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Asarelah 02:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Atkins Nutritional Approach. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Dakota ~ ° 04:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 16:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 16:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for editing Laura Bush. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // Tawkerbot2 16:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

RexNL 16:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Hokum, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. whipsandchains 05:41, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Muhammad's marriages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 05:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad's marriages

You have reverted twice to YOUR version. Please stop. You are giving no references to support your claim that Maria was a virgin. There is no reference to her virginity in Ibn Ishaq or Tabari. In both books, she is described as a "slave girl". She may have been victimized by a string of owners for all we know. Zora 06:40, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please Don't Vandalize (2nd Warning).

This message is concerning the article User:Master of Puppets. Please stop adding nonsense or blanking articles on Wikipedia. This will be considered vandalism if it continues. Please use the sandbox for any further testing.

— nathanrdotco m ^{(Got something to say? Say it.)} 05:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Your edit to Kanye West

Your recent edit to Kanye West was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 00:26, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Warriors of Virtue. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Olorin28 22:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Slurve

Your recent edit to Slurve was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikiped

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism has shown you to be intent on doing harm to Wikipedia. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --digital_m e^{(TalkˑContribs)} 17:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Drini. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 20:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Fidel Castro on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —D-Rock 17:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Leroy S. Starrett, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 20:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Renaldo Balkman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TBCTaLk?!? 03:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC) [reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Renaldo Balkman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TBCTaLk?!? 03:41, 29 June 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Your edit to Apple

Your recent edit to Apple (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 03:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Tom Cruise, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- — xaosflux ^Talk 02:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Your edit to Iggy Pop

Your recent edit to Iggy Pop (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 03:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tom Cruise, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Steve 06:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your message on my talkpage.

2006-07-23 01:24:44 152.163.100.72:

I will try to keep my articles serious if you try to MIND YOUR OWN BUSSINESS. I havent written anything here in quite some time, and have enjoyed watching this form grow, and learn from others, but it seems like some HUGE JERKOFF always wants to go and belittle me, irregardless. There simply is no reasom to be hateful like that. What article are you referring to? Most of my posts have been exceptoinal, earning me many a barn star award. I noticed you havent got that many, so Im gonna go ahead and give you one of mine as a peace offering, but in the future try not to belittle me as I have been tutoring to become an ADMINISTRATOR!!!

I assume that you are Pickelbarrel. If I am wrong, I apologize.

“I will try to keep my articles serious if you try to MIND YOUR OWN BUSSINESS.”

Sorry, but a user on Sho.Com [1] called Jaker claims to be you and vandalize WikiPedia.Org. If Jaker is not you, you should complain to Sho.Com about Jaker impersonating you and get Jaker banned from Sho.Com.

“I havent written anything here in quite some time, and have enjoyed watching this form grow, and learn from others, but it seems like some HUGE JERKOFF always wants to go and belittle me, irregardless.”

I am sorry if that is the impression I gave.

“There simply is no reasom to be hateful like that.”

Again, I apologize.

“What article are you referring to?”

This is what Jaker said he did:

jaker

posts: 154

07/22/2006 12:30 AM

re: Global Warming

I dont know that most vandals get deleted in less than five minuites...I added some fake shit myself about Ben Folds lyp syning after he encourages us to post shit on the web about it during one of his concerts, and added a bit about Kris Roe from The Ataries coming back and screeming “Fuck The Space Shuttle” after playing with the Severe and Profound (An inside joke between him and I) that lasted about a week.

Jimbo has made weird rules about all kinds of shit, although Im not sure about deciding on specific revisions, and the main editors quarrel about the rules constanly.

I created a user based on the chatracter Timothy Dexler(aguy considered to be the most lucky man in the world regardless of the fact that he is a notoriously bad speller, and dumb as toast) call pickelbarrel that added shit to wikipedia all the time, and have seen first hand the way editors will change the rules base entirely on their whims, and weather or not they like you.

I would add good posts, and relevent links and have some editors immediately take them down, while other editors would fight for me claiming I was adding legitimate articles. Thing is, neither side base dit the actual article, they based it on weather they liked me, or thought the article should even be in wikipedia.

The whole reason i started screwing with the system, was to put in a entry for one of my freinds bands, but then I realized that that they didnt have an entry for taint(slang) and I decided to add one, what followed was one of the most heated battles Ive ever witnessed over the validity of allowing “taint” in wikipedia. The whole thing was histerical, but I learned alot about the folley that goes on in wikipedia...including some disputes editors had with the esteemed Jimbo.

I never reall took the stuff personally, because who cares, but Ill tell you what, you can see rules being bent and changed all over the place in that mad house. Giving all the examples would take too much time, but I remeber a debate over weather a link should be added to Izzy Stradlin and the Ju Ju Hounds on the Guns -N- Roses website. The argument against it was that his band wasnt relevent to G-N-R but they had links to LA Gunns, Slashes Snake Pitt, and Velvet Revolver. The entries weere definately NOT from a neutral POV, as they assume that Izzy isnt as important member as Slash.

Now that alone wouldnt be a problem, but the whole site is riddled with this kind of shit, and editors who dont want their articles changed (one editor was furious with people who kept going to his beloved “dingleberry” site and adding references to clumps of stuff that hangs from peoples ass)

Now all that being said, wikipedia isnt a bad source, but again it just isnt reliable. Go in and add something to an article that is partially true, but not completely. If its not some article that one of these editors gaurds, you will find out just how long it lasts. Im not paticualrily clever and if MY completely nonscensical articles can stay up for over a week, then Ill bet there are plenty others that have lasted longer.

As I say, most of the articles are good, many are incomplet, some are bad, and a few are completely wrong.

As long as you realize this going in, your fine. It is certainly helpful in finding info about certain subjects, jsut dont rely on it to validate your facts.

“Most of my posts have been exceptoinal, earning me many a barn star award.”

That is great.

“I noticed you havent got that many, so Im gonna go ahead and give you one of mine as a peace offering,”

¡Thanks! It is very nice, but I am not into penispictures.

“but in the future try not to belittle me as I have been tutoring to become an ADMINISTRATOR!!!”

I hope you do well.

-

— Ŭalabio‽ 03:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.