I have created over 20 (Including Redirects) articles and I plan to do more. Roshan014Talk 12:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The right is often granted to prolific article creator who had demonstrated a core understanding of the basic Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Unfortunately, you had only created 19 pages. A suggested standard is the prior creation of 50 valid articles not including redirect and disambiguation pages. Having reviewed your articles, some of them appears to be copyvios. I flagged Ansiba Hassan, an article you recently created for deletion as Unambiguous copyright infringement of this website and had been deleted appropriately here. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 12:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Arbustum has created many well-sourced and well-formatted articles about Polish topics that do not need to be reviewed. Autopatrol is appropriate. Agtx (talk) 19:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment - An extraneous header was removed from this request. — MusikBottalk 19:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
First, I am nowhere near a prolific article creator, only 20 so far. I have however noticed I do generate a lot of new pages, mostly user talk pages when warning users of, whatever it might be. I thought I'd ask for the bit to help the new page patrollers at any rate. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Thanks for your willingness to help in reducing the workload on New page patrollers. The tool have no effects on your ability to warn vandals or other editors and You do not need to be autopatrolled to patrol new pages. The tool will only allow you to patrol your own newly created pages, thereby reducing the burdens on New Page Patollers. Nevertheless, the flag is usually granted to prolific article creator who had demonstrated a core understanding of the basic Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Unfortunately, you had only created 12 valid articles (apart from redirect and disambiguation pages). A suggested standard is the prior creation of 50 valid articles not including redirect and disambiguation pages. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 21:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
LOL seriously!? Wikicology you probably should not decline requests when you are physically unable to approve them. Mlpearc, user-right granted with enthusiasm. You have been around for many many years and are a very trusted user, whose page creations are clearly beyond the need to automatic reviewing by new-page-patrollers. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 21:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done Nakon 02:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Not done. The right is often granted to prolific article creator who had demonstrated a core understanding of the basic Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Unfortunately, you had only created 19 pages. A suggested standard is the prior creation of 50 valid articles not including redirect and disambiguation pages. Having reviewed your articles, some of them appears to be copyvios. I flagged Ansiba Hassan, an article you recently created for deletion as Unambiguous copyright infringement of this website and had been deleted appropriately here. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 12:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
