Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 10
August 10
Template:House of Aragon
- Template:House of Aragon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:House of Bourbon (Spain, 1700–1833) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:House of Bourbon, 1833-present (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:49, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Template:House of Habsburg (Mary I of England arms)
- Template:House of Habsburg (Mary I of England arms) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:House of Habsburg (Charles I arms) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:House of Habsburg (Isabella and Albert, Sovereigns of the Habsburg Netherlands) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
same template, different image (see diff and see diff), nearly unused and redundant to {{House of Habsburg (Spain)}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Template:Msg start
- Template:Msg start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Used in only one page as a seeming test. Izno (talk) 15:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Unused, and Flow does it much better anyway. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 16:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Template:Msg end
- Template:Msg end (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Used in only one page as a seeming test. Izno (talk) 15:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per my comment for Msg start above. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 16:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Template:User wikipedia/Content Creator
Do I really need to explain why this is a Really Bad Idea? The idea that "content creators" are some kind of special group somehow distinct from the general editor base is not one that should be encouraged, and adding a "Content Creator" userbox serves no useful purpose (any genuine content creator is perfectly capable of adding some examples of the content they've created to their userpage, if they feel the urge to boast). Please, lets nip this in the bud before it has a chance to spread onto userpages. ‑ iridescent 15:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree that this is a false dichotomy that we don't want to encourage. I see that we also have Template:Content Creator topicon and Category:Wikipedian Content Creators, as well as the page Wikipedia:Content Creator itself. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 16:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- wrong venue, userboxes are discussed at WP:MFD per the instructions at the top of WP:TFD. Frietjes (talk) 16:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Only one transclusion (in Killiondude's sandbox at User:Killiondude/oregon). If the functionality was more widely used we could integrate it into Module:Navbox, but with one transclusion there doesn't seem to be much point. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment why is this permanently protected [1] as a highly visible template? -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Presumably back then it had lots of transclusions. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Template:Vale of Leithen F.C.
- Template:Vale of Leithen F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Stirling University F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Spartans F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Selkirk F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Preston Athletic F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Gala Fairydean Rovers F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Edinburgh University F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:East Kilbride F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Dalbeattie Star F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Cumbernauld Colts F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wick_Academy_F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Rothes F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Lossiemouth F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Keith F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Huntly F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fraserburgh F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fort William F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Forres Mechanics F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Formartine United F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Deveronvale F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Clachnacuddin F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Buckie Thistle F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Links to only two or three articles, difficult to see how these are useful aids to navigation, particularly given that all the extant blue links are given in the primary club articles in the first instance. Fenix down (talk) 12:55, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all - simply not needed. GiantSnowman 17:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator's rationale. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Trade route templates
- Template:Trade routes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (vertical)
- Template:Trade route 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (navbox)
Trade route 2 is duplicate of vertical template with same content, Template:Trade routes. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have added a second template and refactored accordingly. Dharmadhyaksha's nomination was to delete the "route 2" version. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:55, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Your change to my !vote was incorrect. My supporting statement obviously shows what was to remain. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep both I think it should be the choice of editors to choose between sidebar and footer navbox. Possibly merge, we can create a switch to choose between the two -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:59, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep navbox - but delete the vertical version. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Template:NZ Parliament
- Template:NZ Parliament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template was created in 2007 and was not designated as being subject to substitution; as of Aug 2015, there are 0 transclusions of the template. In January 2014, the template was placed into a category indicating it did not conform to standard citation template style and no edits have been done to it since then. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as unused. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 09:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as unused. I can't determine if the intention was to manage Hansard or references to Acts, bills or Special Regulations but all use a different format. --Karl Stephens ( talk | contribs ) 09:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)