Jump to content

Indian Legion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 137.73.86.111 (talk) at 21:26, 27 August 2006 (→‎Perceptions as collaborators). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

File:Freies Indien.jpg

The Legion Freies Indien, or the Indische Freiwilligen-Legion Regiment 950 variously known as the Tiger Legion, the Free India Legion (in English), The Azad Hind Legion, or the I.R 950 (Indisches Infanterie Regiment 950) was an Indian armed unit raised in 1941 attatched to the Wehrmacht, ostensibly according to the concept of an Indian Liberation force[1] during the Second World War by Subhash Chandra Bose in Nazi Germany. The intial recruits were Indian student volunteers resident in Germany at the time, and a handful of Indian PoWs captured by the Rommel during his North Africa Campaign. It would later draw a larger number of Indian PoWs as volunteers. Raised intially as an assault group that would form a pathfinder to a German/Indian invasion of the western frontiers of British India, only a small contingent ever was put into it’s original intended purpose when a hundred of the Legionnaires were parachuted into eastern Persia (present day Iran) to infiltrate into India through Baluchistan and commence sabotage operations against the British in preparation for the anticipated national revolt[2] A majority of the troops of the Free India Legion only was only ever stationed in Europe -mostly in non-combat duties- from Netherlands, to Atlantic Wall duties in France till the Allied invasion of France. A small contingent, including the leadership and the officer corps, was also transferred to Azad Hind after it’s formation and saw action in the INA’s Burma Campaign. [3] Although it has been alleged to have been a colloaborationst Heer Unit, the unit was not deployed as a part of the Nazi War effort or defences in Europe [4] but did see actions against British and polish troops and also undertook anti-partisan operations in Italy in 1944.[5]

At the time of the surrender of the Third Reich in 1945, remaining troops of the Free India Legion made efforts to march to Neutral Switzerland over the Alps, but these efforts proved futile as they were captured by American and French troops and eventually shipped back to India to face charges of Treason.

Background

The origins of the idea of a raising an armed force that would fight it's way into India to bring douwn the Raj goes back to the First World War, when the Ghadar Party and the nascent embryo of the Indian Independence League formulated plans to intiate rebellion in the British Indian Army from Punjab to Hong Kong with German Support. This plan failed after the information was leaked to British Intellignece, but only after the Hong Kong Garrison had rebelled.

However, during the second world war, all the three major Axis Powers, at some stage of their campaign against Britain, sought to support the armed revolutionary activities whithin India and aided the recruitment of a military force from disaffected Indian prisoners-of war captured while serving with the British Commonwealth forces and Indian expatriates, of which the most famous, and sucessful, was probably the Indian National Army that came into being with Japanese Support in the Far East. Italy had in 1942 created the Battaglione Azad Hindoustan, with ex- Indian Army personnel and Italians previously resident in India and Persia, that ultimately served under Ragruppamento Centri Militari. [6] However, these efforts proved unsuccessful, given the overtly propagandist nature of their efforts that ultimately found little acceptance among the constituent soldiers , and the lack of a leadership that woud deemed legitimate by the troops[7]. By November 1942, following the defeats in El Alamein, the Italian efforts had failed.

However at this time in India, although the congress party had passed resolutiions conditionally supporting the fight against fascism[8], Indian public opinion was more hostile at Britain's unilateral decision to declare India a belligerent on the side of the allies. Among the more rebellious amongst Indian political leaders of the time was Subhash Chandra Bose, who was viewed as a potent threat enough that when the war started, the Raj put him under arrest, and later, house arrest.Bose escaped from under British surveillance at his house in Calcutta On January 19 1941, with the help of family members, members of his part- the Forward Bloc- and later the Abwehr,he made his way through Afghanistan to the Soviet Union. Once in Russia the NKVD transported Bose to Moscow where he hoped that Russia's traditional enmity to British rule in India would result in support for his plans for a popular rising in India. However, Bose found the Soviets' response disappointing and was rapidly passed over to the German Ambassador in Moscow, Count von der Schulenberg arranged for Bose to be sent to Berlin at the beginning of April where he met Rippentrop and later, Hitler.[9]. In Berlin, Bose set up the Azad Hind Radio and the Free India Centre which commenced broadcasting to Indians in short wave frequecies. The Azad Hind Radio broadcasts were estimated to have regularly been received by 30,000 Indians who possessed the requisite receiver. [10] However, soon, Bose's aim became to raise an army that he imagined would march to India's NWFP with German forces through the Caucasus and trigger the down fall of the Raj.

Origin

File:Freies Indien Legion France.jpg
Recruits of the Free India Legion at Künigsbrück.

The first troops of the Free India Legion were derived from Rommel's Indian PoWs captured at El Mekili, Libya during the Battles for Tobruk.

Intially a core group of 27 officers were selcted in May 1941 and flown to Berlin. A larger PoW camp of about 10,000 was also set up in Annaburg were Subhash Bose met the Indian PoW .[11] From these, a group of approximately 6,000 men were transferred to the Frankenburg Camp, from which a further core of 300 soldiers were sent to Künigsbrück for training and induction. It was at Künigsbrück that the uniform of Free India Legion- German Field Gray with the badge of The Leaping Tiger of Azad Hind was issued. The formation of the Indian National Army was announced by the German Propaganda Ministry in January 1942 [12]. It did not, however, take oath until 26 August 1942, as the Legion Freies Indien of the German Army. By May of 1943, the numbers had been swelled, aided by the enlistment as volunteers of Indian expetriates in Germany. [13]

Organistaion

The British Indian Army, possibly as an extension of the divide and rule policy, organised regiments and units on the basis of religion and regional identity. Bose, from very early on, sought to eradicate this practice to build on an unified Indian identity. Consequently, the Free India Legion was organised as mixed units so that Moslems, Hindus, Sikhs, Jats, Rajputs, Marathas and Garhwalis all served side-by- side. [14]Approximately two-thirds of the Legion's members were Muslim and one- third Hindu and other religions, including a large number of Sikhs.[15]. That Bose's idea of unifying developing a unified nationalist identity was successful is evident from the fact that when Himmler proposed in late 1943- after Bose's Departure to the Far East- that the Muslim soldiers of the I.R. 950 be recruited into the 13th SS Volunteer Bosnian-Herzegovinian Mountain Division (Croatia) that was formed at the time, the head of the SS Head office Gottlob Berger was obliged to point out that while the Bosnians perceived themselves as people of an European identity, the Muslims perceived themselves as Indians. [16]

Uniform and Standard

File:Freies Indien Legion Soldier.jpg
Troop of the Legion Freies Indien. The badge of the Leaping Tiger can be seen on the uniform.
File:Freies Indien standard.jpg
The standard of the Legion Freies Indien. The same design came to be adopted as the flag of Azad Hind.

The uniform issued to the Free India Legion were the standard German Army uniform of Field Gray (Feld Grau)in winter and Khaki in Summer. Additionally, the troops wore on their right upper arm a specially designed arm badge in the shape of the shield with three horizontal stripes of the saffron, white and green - the colours of the flag of Azad Hind- and featuring a leaping tiger on the white middle band. The legend Freies Indien inscribed black featured on a white background above the tricolor. A saffron, white and green transfer was also worn on the left side of their helmets. Sikhs in the Legion were permitted to wear a turban, of a color appropriate to their uniform as dictated by their religion instead of the usual peaked field cap.

The standard of the Free India Legion- presented as regimetal colours in 1942- featured the same design as the arm badge of the IR 950 consisting of saffron, white and green horizontal bands in the stated order from top to bottom. The white middle band was approximately three times the width of the two colored bands. The words "AZAD" and "HIND" in white were inscribed over the saffron and green bands respectively. Also over the white middle band featured a leaping tiger. This is essentially the same design that the Azad Hind Government later adopted as their flag, although photographic evidence shows that the later Indian National Army, at least during the Burma Campign, may not have Carried it as their Battle Standard, opting for the Flag of the Congress instead [17]

Structure and Units

Free India Legion was organized as a standard German army infantry regiment of three battalions of four companies each, with, at leas initially all the commissioned officers German. It has been later reffered to as Panzergrenadier Regiment 950 (indische) [18], indicating the unit was partially Motorised. It was equipped with 81 motor vehicles and 700 horses[19]. In this structure, the legion came to consist of

  • I. Bataillon |Infanterie Kompanien 1 to 4
  • II. Bataillon |Infanterie Kompanien 5 to 8
  • III. Bataillon |Infanterie Kompanien 9 to 12
  • 13th Infanteriegeschütz Kompanie (Infantry-Gun Company |consisting of six 7.5cm leichtes Infanteriegeschütz 18)
  • 14th Panzerjäger Kompanie (Anti-tank Company | consisting of six Panzerabwehrkanone)
  • 15th Pionier Kompanie (Engineer Company)
  • Ehrenwachkompanie (Honour Guard Company)

It also consisted of Hospital staff and Training & Maintenance Staff(Ausbildungs und Betreutungsstab ) [20]

Freies Indien in operation

It is doubtful that Subhash Chandra Bose envisaged the Free India Legion (or Azad Hind Legion as it came to be more popularly known by the time he left Germany for theFar East) as an army sufficient or strong enough to conduct a campaign across Persia into India on its own. It is highly unlikely that Bose woud have accepted the British empire replaced by a German one in India.Instead, most histrorians accept that the IR 950 was to become the path finder would precede a much larger Indo-German force in a caucasian campaign into the western frontiers of British India that would encourage public resentment to the Raj and incite the British Indian army into revolt.

To this end, Operation Bajadere was conducted in January 1942 when a detachment of the Freies Indien, numbering about one hundred and having trained with the German Special Forces, were paradropped into Eastern Persia tasked to infiltrate into India through Baluchistan. They were also tasked to commence sabotage operations in preparation for the anticipated national revolt. Information passed on to Abwehr headquarters in Berlin from their office in Kabul indicate that they were successful.[21]

Following German defeat in Europe at Stalingrad and in North Africa at El Alamein it became clear that an Axis assault through Iran or even USSR was unlikely. Bose had in the mean time travelled to the Far East were the Japanese troops were threatening India. Bose's army in the South Asia, the Indian National Army successfully engaged the allies along with the Japanese 15th Army in Burma and ultimately entered India through Moirang to lay siege on Imphal. The German Naval High Command at this time made the decision to transfer the leadership and a segment of the Freies Indien to the Azad Hind Government in South Asia and on 21 January, it was formally made a part of the Indian National Army.

Holland and France

File:Freies Indien Legion Parade.jpg
Troops of the Indian Legion, in France.

A majority of the troops of the Indian Legion, however, were to remain in Europe through the war and was never utillised in their original percepted role over Persia and Central Asia. The Legion was transferred to Zeeland in Netherlands in April 1943 as part of the Atlantic wall duties and later to France in September 1943, attached to 344 Infanterie-Division, and later the 159. Infanterie-Division of the Wehrmacht.

From Beverloo, I Battalion was reassigned to Zandvoort in May 1943 were they stayed till relieved by Georgian Infanterie Bataillon 822 in August. In September 1943, the battalion was deployed on the Atlantic coast of Bordeaux on the Bay of Biscay. The II Battalion moved from Beverloo to the island of Texel in May 1943 and stayed there till relived in September of that year. From here, it was deployed to to Les Salles d'Ollonne in France. [22]. The III Battalion remained at Oldebroek as Corps Reserve till the end of September 1943. [23]

Indische Freiwilligen Legion der Waffen SS

The Legion was stationed in the Lacanau region of Bordeaux at the time of the Normandy landings and remained there for upto two months after D-Day. On the 8th of August its control was tranferred to the Waffen SS (as was that of every other volunteer units of the Wehrmacht). Command of the legion was tranferred from Kurt Krapp to Heinz Bertling. On 15 August, 1944, the unit pulled out of Lacanau to make its way back to Germany. It was in the second leg of this journey, from Poitier to Chatrou that it suffered its first combat casualty (Lt Ali Khan) while engaging French Regular forces in the town of Dun. The unit also engaged with allied armour Nuis St. Georges while retreating across the Loire to Dijon. It was regularly harassed by the French Resistance, suffering two more casualties (Lt Kalu Ram and Capt Mela Ram). The unit moved from Remisemont, through Alsace, to Oberhofen near the town of Heuberg in Germany in the winter of 1944[24], where it stayed till March 1945.

Italy

II Battalion, 9th Company, of the Legion also saw action in Italy. Having been deployed in the spring of 1944, it saw action against the British 5th Corps and the Polish 2nd Corps before it was withdrawn from the front to be used in antipartisan operations. It surrendered to the Allied forces April 1945, still in Italy. [25]

End of the Legion Freies Indien

With the defeat of the Third Reich imminent in May 1945, the Indian Legion sought sanctuary in neutral Switzerland. The remainder of the unit undertook a desperate march along the shores of Lake Constance, attempting to enter Switzerland via the alpine passes. This was, however, unsuccessful and the Legion was captured by US and French forces and delivered to British and Indian forces in Europe. They would later be shipped back to India where a number of the troops would stand trial for treason. It is alleged that a number of the Indian soldiers were shot by French troops before their delivery to British Forces.[26]

Legacy of the Free India Legion

Integral associations with Nazi Germany and Japan means Free India Legion's legacy have to be considered in distinct view points of both a collaborationist army of the Third Reich as well as the realisation of a liberation army against the British Raj in India

The Free India Legion was conceived with the same doctrine as the Indian National Army and the entire Azad Hind movement, it has found little exposure since the end of the war even in Independent India, possibly due to a perception that their fight was far removed from the Battlefields of Burma, a land much closer to India where the troops of the INA fought and died and caught the public imagination. To consider the legacy of Free India Legion, however, one has to consider both the Azad Hind Movement (of which the Legion was possibly a birth mother, and certainly an integral plan of Bose's intial plans) and the events that happened at the time, both in and away from the public eye.

Perceptions as collaborators

In considering the history of the Free India Legion and the ramifications of its creation, the greyest tinge comes to be its integral link to the Nazi Germany, with a prevailed perception that they were mere mercenaries and colaborators of the Third Reich by the virtue of their uniform, oath and field of operation. To properly assess this, one has to first assess what actions it is that may be termed colaborationist. Throughout Europe, during and after the war, collaboration came to be defined broadly as; being party to the Nazi philosophy of Aryan- and even more so, German- supremacy as a race; actively supporting and participating in the Nazi atrocities against inferior races and occupied people in support of furthering the Nazi ideology, and; actively supporting the Nazi war effort.

As a prologue to the main debate on these issues, it ought to be mentioned that the Founder and leader of the Free India Legion, Subhash Chandra Bose (for Bose was life blood of the entire Free India Movement in Germany, and later in South Asia). Bose, in 1931, had organized and led protest marches against the Japanese invasion of Manchuria and of China itself in 1938 when he was Congress president. In 1937 he published an article attacking Japanese Imperialism in the Far East, although he betrayed some admiration for other aspects of the Japanese regime [27]. Bose's earlier correspondence (prior to 1939) also reflects his deep disapproval of the racist practices of, and annulment of democratic institutions in Nazi Germany [28]. He also, however, expressed admiration for the authoritarian methods (though not the racial ideologies) which he saw in Italy and Germany during the 1930s, and thought they could be used in building an independent India ref>Sen, S. 1999. Subhas Chandra Bose 1897-1945. From webarchive of this URL.</ref>.

However, this does not address whether the men of the Freies Indien were party to or in collaboration with the Nazi machinery. In these contexts, it is doubtful that the Indian PoWs were party to or held any loyalty to the Nazi ideology of racial supremacy given that they would have been aware of their perceived status as an inferior race. It is also fallacious to say that the soldiers of the Free India Legion were mere mercenaries who fought with the Reich, for money or power. Indeed, when the first PoWs were brought to Annaburg camp and met by Subhash Chandra Bose, there was marked open hositllity towards him as a Nazi propaganda puppet [29]. Subsequent to this, at a time when Bose's efforts and views had gained more sympathy, a persistent query among the (then) PoWs had been "How would the Legionary stand in relation to the German soldier?" [30]. Neither were they prepared to fight Germany's war for Germany's people for Germany's interests. Italy had in 1942 created the Battaglione Azad Hindoustan, with Indian PoWs captured by Italy, and Italians previously resident in India and Persia and led by an Indian resident in Rome for a long-time, Iqbal Shedai, whose rallying cry was to raise an Indian Unit to fight for India. In November 1942 the unit was three hundred and fifty strong, having been trained by Italian officers. Much has been said of the "dubious loyalty" of this unit. On 9 November, after the Allied landing in North Africa, the Italian high command made the decision to send the men to be sent to Libya to fight the allies instead of being sent to India to fight for India's freedom, contrary to Shedai’s promises. The men refused to go and mutinied, Shedai refused to intervene. Consequently, the Centro Militare India was disbanded.[31][32]The men of the Battaglione Azad Hindoustan are later said to have been either integrated into the Free India Legion or sent back to PoW camps. In another instance, immediately prior to the first deployment of the Free India Legion in Holland in April 1943, after departure of I Battalion from Koenigsbrueck, two Companies whithin the II Battalion refused to move. The Free India Centre- in charge of the Legion after the departure of Bose in January 1943 for South Asia- came to face a number of grievances, prime which stood out two particular; some were influenced by a rumour that Netaji had abandoned them and had gone off leaving them entirely in German hands; a second grievance was a perception that the Wehrmacht was now going to use them in the Western Front, instead of sending them to the East to fight for India’s liberation. [33] Even in the east, where the Indian National Army took it's collossal shape, the first efforts under Capt. Mohan Singh came to nought essentially because Rash Behari Bose, who led the Indian Independence League (of which the first INA in the east was integraly linked) lost credence among the troops, appearing as a Japanese pawn. These goes to show that the allegations of dubious loyalty are nothing better than a farce because the men never owed loyalty either to the Fascist or the Nazi cause or ideology. Their motivation was to fight for India' liberation, their loyalty lay to India. They were unwilling to fight for an alien nation and for a cause that was distant to the sacrosanct one for which they had abandoned their oath to the King Emperor.

These, at the least, indicate that the Free India Legion was not a lovechild of desire to serve the Reich or it's philosophy, wed to an oppurtunity to do so. If anything, Bose sought from early on to ensure that the troops were seen and treated as equal to their German counterparts [34]

As for having participated in the Nazi war effort, in Europe the unit's deployments in Holland and France appear to be solely for training purposes, according to Bose's plans for the unit to be trained in some aspects of coastal defence. [35] Bose had also had the German High Command committed to not deploying the unit for purposes of German military interests and strategy. [36]. Indeed after the invasion of France by the Allies, the unit was ordered back to Germany. BBC, in a revisionist article (see external links below) suggests that the unit participated in Nazi atrocities, especially in the town of Ruffec. This is not corroborated by any other records. Furthermore, the French resistance, certainly very strong through-out the German occupation of France, was not aware of the presence of the Indian unit, something it would be expected to pick up far before the information being passed by defecting German officers. [37] This may therefore require more authentication. The allegations that the Free India Legion was nothing more than a collaborationist Heer unit is therefore a very simplistic but distorted view of a formation of men who saw themselves AS patriots and pioneers, not Nazis or collaborationsts.

A Liberation Army

The Free India Legion did not engage in it's original conceived role in the western front of British India, so it is a fallacy to hold any arguments as to whether they did- or could have- fulfilled the destiny that the men of the Legion had dreamt of. Moreover, the Legion was, and still remains, far removed from public perception in India, possibly because it did not engage it's enemy, the British Raj, Even the 9th Company's engagements in Italy with British forces are hardly known outside those circles with an interest in WWII history. Was, then, Bose's plans for Azad Hind Legion too grandiose for its own capabillity? In terms of military capabillity, that question is unanswerable. But in political terms, to consider the Azad Hind Legion a paper tiger is more than an untruth. To consider the effects that the legion had, one has therefore to consider the effects that the entire Azad Hind movement had on the culmination of British Raj in India.

After the war ended, the stories of the INA and the Free India Legion were seen as so inflammatory that, fearing mass revolts and uprisings—not just in India, but across its empire—the British Government forbid the BBC from broadcasting their story.[38]. The Raj also brought to trial soldiers and officers of the INA (as well as the Free India Legion, of which not much is known). However, the stories of the trials at the Red Fort filtered through. The Raj observed with alarm the turnaround in the perception of Azad Hind and its army as traitors and collaborators to the greatest among the patriots. [39]

During the trial, inspired to a large extent by the stories of the INA soldiers that were going around the country at the time mutiny broke out in the Royal Indian Navy(the mutiny had other underlying social and political causes as well; see article), incorporating ships and shore establishements of the RIN throughout India, from Karachi to Bombay and from Vizag to Calcutta. The most significant, if disconcerting factor for the Raj, was the significant militant public support that it received.[40]. A wave of nationalist sentiments swept through the Indian troops who had fought with the allies and were in the process of being de-mobillised. The navy mutiny was followed up by another among the ground crew in the Royal Indian Air Force. Another Army mutiny took place at Jabalpur during the last week of February 1946, soon after the Navy mutiny at Bombay. This was suppressed by force, including the use of the bayonet by British troops. It lasted about two weeks. After the mutiny, about 45 persons were tried by court martial. 41 were sentenced to varying terms of imprisonment or dismissal. In addition, a large number were discharged on administrative grounds.

In the after-effect of the mutiny, Weekly intelligence summary issued on the 25th of March, 1946 admitted that the the Indian army, navy and air force units were no longer trust worthy, and, for the army, "only day to day estimates of steadiness could be made". [41]. It was decided that; if wide-scale public unrest took shape, the armed forces (including the airforce- for Quit India had shown how it could turn violent) could not be relied upon to support counter-insurgency operations as they had been during the Quit India movement of 1942, and drawing from experiences of the Tiger Legion and the INA, their actions could not be predicted from their oath to the King emperor [42].

Reflecting on the factors that guided the British decision to relinquish the Raj in India, Clement Attlee, the then British prime minister, cited several reasons, the most important of which were: which were the INA activities of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, which weakened the Indian Army - the foundation of the British Empire in India- and the RIN Mutiny that made the British realise that the Indian armed forces could no longer be trusted to prop up the Raj. [43].

Although Britain had made, at the time of the Cripps' mission in 1942, a committment [44] to grant dominion status [45] to India after the war; these events and views held in 1946 by the administrations of the Raj would suggest to the reader that, contrary to the usual narrative of India's independence struggle, (which generally focusses on Congress and Mahatma Gandhi), the INA and the revolts, mutinies, and public resentment it germinated were an important factor in the complete withdrawal of the Raj from India.

In the same breath, whether awarded any credit for India's independence or not, the events at the time show that the strategy of Azad Hind (derived from the embryo of the Free India Legion) of achieveing independence from Britain by formenting revolts and public unrests- although a militarily a failure- remains, politically, a magnamanious success.

References

  1. ^ Axis War Makes Easier Task of Indians. Chandra Bose's Berlin Speech. Chandra Bose’s Berlin Speech. Syonan Sinbun, 26 January 1943.
  2. ^ Weale, Renegades, p. 137-138.
  3. ^ Kurowski, The Brandenburgers - Global Mission., p. 137
  4. ^ Borra R. Journal of Historical Review, 3, no. 4 (Winter 1982), pp. 407-439
  5. ^ Antonio J Munoz - The East Came West: Muslim, Hindu & Buddhist Volunteers in the German Armed Forces, 1941-1945. Axis Europa Book, 2002.
  6. ^ Lundari, I Paracadutisti Italiani 1937/45, p. 90
  7. ^ ibid.
  8. ^ Official Website of the Indian National Congress, sub-link to article titled The Second World War and the Congress. http://www.aicc.org.in/the_congress_and_the_freedom_movement.htm#the. URL accessed on 20-Jul-2006
  9. ^ Kurowski, The Brandenburgers -Global Mission, p. 136
  10. ^ James L. Raj; Making and unmaking of British India. Abacus. 1997. p555.
  11. ^ Weale, Renegades, p. 213
  12. ^ ibid.
  13. ^ ibid.
  14. ^ Littlejohn, Foreign Legions of the Third Reich, Vol.4, p. 127
  15. ^ Houterman, Eastern Troops in Zeeland, The Netherlands, 1943-1945, p. 63
  16. ^ Lepre, Himmler's Bosnian Division, p. 117
  17. ^ Davis, Flags of the Third Reich 2: Waffen SS, pp. 42.
  18. ^ Davis, Flags of the Third Reich 2: Waffen SS, p 22
  19. ^ Caballero Jurado, Foreign Volunteers of the Wehrmacht 1941-45, p. 31
  20. ^ Caballero Jurado, Foreign Volunteers of the Wehrmacht 1941-45, p. 31
  21. ^ See *2
  22. ^ Houterman, Eastern Troops in Zeeland, The Netherlands, 1943-1945, p. 63
  23. ^ ibid.
  24. ^ Davis, Flags of the Third Reich 2: Waffen SS, pp. 22
  25. ^ Antonio J Munuz - The East came West
  26. ^ Davis, Flags of the Third Reich 2: Waffen SS, pp. 22
  27. ^ "Japan's Role in the Far East" (originally published in the Modern Review in October 1937): "Japan has done great things for herself and for Asia. Her reawakening at the dawn of the present century sent a thrill throughout our Continent. Japan has shattered the white man's prestige in the Far East and has put all the Western imperialist powers on the defensive - not only in the military but also in the economic sphere. She is extremely sensitive - and rightly so - about her self-respect as an Asiatic race. She is determined to drive out the Western powers from the Far East. But could not all this have been achieved without Imperialism, without dismembering the Chinese Republic, without humiliating another proud, cultured and ancient race? No, with all our admiration for Japan, where such admiration is due, our whole heart goes out to China in her hour of trial" The Essential Writings of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Edited by Sisir K. Bose & Sugata Bose (Delhi: Oxford University Press) 1997 p190
  28. ^ Bose to Dr. Thierfelder of the Deutsche Academie, Kurhaus Hochland, Badgastein, 25th March 1936 "Today I regret that I have to return to India with the conviction that the new nationalism of Germany is not only narrow and selfish but arrogant. The recent speech of Herr Hitler in Munich gives the essence of Nazi philosophy......The new racial philosophy which has a very weak scientific foundation stands for the glorification of the white races in general and the German race in particular. Herr Hitler has talked of the destiny of white races to rule over the rest of the world. But the historical fact is that up till now the Asiatics have dominated Europe more than have the Europeans dominated Asia. One only has to consider the repeated invasions of Europe by Mongols, the Turks, the Arabs (Moors), the Huns, and other Asiatic races to understand the strength of my argument...." The Essential Writings of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Edited by Sisir K. Bose & Sugata Bose (Delhi: Oxford University Press) 1997 p155
  29. ^ Toye, Hugh, The Springing Tiger, London, Cassell, 1959, p. 63
  30. ^ Toye, Hugh, The Springing Tiger, London, Cassell, 1959, p. 63
  31. ^ Borra R. Journal of Historical Review, 3, no. 4 (Winter 1982), pp. 407-439.
  32. ^ Unpublished, Public Relations Office, London. War Office. 208/761A; James L. Raj; Making and unmaking of British India. Abacus. 1997. p553.
  33. ^ Borra R op.cit.
  34. ^ Borra R op.cit. Netaji sought and got agreement from the Germans that the Wehrmacht would train the Indians in the strictest military discipline, and they were to be trained in all branches of infantry in using weapons and motorized units the same way a German formation is trained; the Indian legionaries were not to be mixed up with any of the German formations; that they were not to be sent to any front other than in India for fighting against the British, but would be allowed to fight in self-defence at any other place if surprised by any enemy formation; that in all other respects the Legion members would enjoy the same facilities and amenities regarding pay, clothing, food, leave, etc., as a German unit.
  35. ^ Ganpuley, N.G., Netaji in Germany: A Little-known Chapter, Bombay, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1959, p153
  36. ^ Borra R op.cit
  37. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3684288.stm
  38. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3684288.stm, Last Section: Mutinies URL accessed on 08-Aug-06
  39. ^ Edwardes, Michael, The Last Years of British India, Cleveland, World Pub. Co.,1964, p. 93.

    The Government of India had hoped, by prosecuting members of the INA, to reinforce the morale of the Indian army. It succeeded only in creating unease, in making the soldiers feel slightly ashamed that they themselves had supported the British. If Bose and his men had been on the right side — and all India now confirmed that they were — then Indians in the Indian army must have been on the wrong side. It slowly dawned upon the Government of India that the backbone of the British rule, the Indian army, might now no longer be trustworthy. The ghost of Subhas Bose, like Hamlet’s father, walked the battlements of the Red Fort (where the INA soldiers were being tried), and his suddenly amplified figure overawed the conference that was to lead to independence.
  40. ^ Wikipedia entry on the RIN mutiny.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombay_Mutiny#Legacy_and_assessments_of_the_effects_of_the_Mutiny. URL accessed on 9-Aug-06.
  41. ^ Unpublished, Public Relations Office, London. War Office. 208/761A; James L. Raj; Making and unmaking of British India. Abacus. 1997. p598.
  42. ^ James L. Raj; Making and unmaking of British India. Abacus. 1997. p571, p598 and; Unpublished, Public Relations Office, London. War Office. 208/819A 25C
  43. ^ Dhanjaya Bhat, Which phase of our freedom struggle won for us Independence? The Tribune, February 12, 2006. Spectrum Suppl. URL accessed on 17-Jul-2006
  44. ^ Judith Brown Modern India. The making of an Asian Democracy (Oxford University Press) 1999 (2nd Edition) pp328-330
  45. ^ James L. Raj; Making and unmaking of British India. Abacus. 1997. p557

See also

References

  • Wilmott, Cross, Messenger "World War II", page 249

Template:IndiaFreedom

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indian_Legion&oldid=72257970"