Talk:Strictly Come Dancing series 14

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reality television task force.

Dance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles

WikiProject Dance To-do list:

To nominate at WP:FAC:
To improve to Featured standard:
To nominate as a Good article:
To expand: 18th century dance - 20th century ballet - Bolero - Choreography on Broadway - Dance education - English ballet - Indian classical dance - Italian ballet - List of dance companies - Meg Stuart - Opera ballet - Sasha Waltz - Scotch reel - Set dance - Physically integrated dance
To cleanup: Contra dance - Salsa (dance) - Dandiya - Lead and follow
To unbias:
To check for copyvios:
To merge: List of dancers and List of dance personalities‎ as per AfD discussion
Substubs needing expansion: see /substubs
To destub: Amir Hossain Babu - Canada Dance Festival - Dance etiquette - Flash dance - more
Needing references: Chorus line - specifically verifying that each girl actually started out as a chorine
To create: Broadway dance - Country Western Dance International - Dance and cinema - Dance and society - German folk dancing - Latin swing - Post-structuralist ballet - Push (dance) - Salon dance - Shuffle dance - Swing boogie - World Dance Alliance - Xavier Le Roy - more
Wanted Pics/Graphics: Category:Dance articles needing images

BBC Unassessed Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

17 pros

I do think it needs to be mentioned that there are currently more pros on the roster than celebrities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.182.169 (talk) 20:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know that is what I thought as well but it means that two may miss out on a partner --MSalmon (talk) 20:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have a Twitter, and got tweets from Natalie Lowe and Kevin Clifton confirming that 2 of the dancers (not yet specified), previously announced as professionals, will be demoted to only appearing in group routines and other background areas. In my opinion, that is a jumbled mess of a way to announce the pros. I was really looking forward to the entire pro line-up and now 2 will just be dropped like a ton of bricks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.182.169 (talk) 13:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Professions

Instead of using the subjective "known for" column for each celebrity, why not use the "profession" listed on their official Strictly bio found here? I am suggesting this here in an effort to reach consensus for making any changes. Knope7 (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lesley Joseph

I noticed her known for column is Stage & screen actress, however she's best known for appearing in Birds of a Feather, this was similar to Kellie Bright last year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:8AA4:5600:A55C:E5FF:5CA6:1B93 (talk) 19:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my suggestion in the previous section. Knope7 (talk) 03:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robert/Judge Rinder

His [bio on the Strictly website] has him down as Judge Rinder, so it seems that's how he'll be referred to on the show - I don't think there's any precedent for this, so should we go with how he's referred to on the show and have him listed in the article as Judge Rinder rather than Robert? Cwmxii (talk) 19:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be in agreement to refer to him as he is stated on the website and now in live shows, he is referred to as "JUDGE RINDER" so this article needs to reflect that. Superdry19 (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How about Robert "Judge" Rinder? That allows readers to see both names. Knope7 (talk) 17:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They announced him as Judge Rinder on the first live show so that is what needs to be used --MSalmon (talk) 21:09, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Robert seems to be a non-word from here on in. Although (curiously) Rinder seems to rhyme with Tinder not Grinder. Mercy! that Cha-Cha-Cha was on fire!! Just shows what two years dressing up on ITV can do to a man. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As he is known as and classed Judge Rinder on the titles and in the live shows that name needs to be used from now on, all mention of the name "Robert" needs removing from the page immediately, I will do it but can no-one revert it please. Superdry19 (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full lists of pairings

Both Radio Times and Telly Mix have full lists of the pairings. If you are adding pairings to pages, please provide a source. The Telegraph also has some of the pairings along with some more background/commentary. Knope7 (talk) 19:50, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi Protection?

Can someone put the page on Semi protection for the course of the series. The dance chart gets so vandalised at this time between the launch show and the dance list for Week 1. NaThang0P (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please remove the semi protection for the course of the series? I wanted to add the TV ratings for the launch show but I am blocked from doing so. Wikipedia is a site for all to freely edit, not the property of some elite who believe they 'own' the site and it's content. 103.10.23.252 (talk) 00:13, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! Wikipedia accounts are free and anyone can create one, not just "elites." You just need to come up with a user name and a password. If you do not want to do that, you can request someone else add the content for you. If you leave a message on this page with the information you want added and a reliable source, another editor can add it, assuming it's appropriate for the article. Knope7 (talk) 22:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to semi-protect it you need to update it to the second. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacktheladisgood (talk • contribs) 20:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You Don't Fucking have the right to semi protect

Wiki elites have the right to do whatever they like. They use and abuse the site to make sure they and only they have access to it by 'semi protecting' (aka locking), protecting (aka locking) and blocking users. So even if you create an account, they will simply block it if you try to add anything without royal approval from an elite. Wikipedia was created to be freely edited. It is now just the domain of the elite. And woe betide anyone who disagrees. One flick of the mouse and you're blocked from editing forever.60.249.88.104 (talk) 16:11, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Identifying dance styles

Dance styles should be identified if they are supported by a reliable source. The source should, in my opinion, identify clearly what style will be performed on a given week. It should provide more than just rehearsal footage that requires editors to guess what style is being practiced. There is no harm in waiting to identify dance styles until a later date when a source expressly confirms it. Knope7 (talk) 20:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll renew my objections to the way the dance styles are being sourced. Some of the videos are clearer than others as to the style being danced and it being the assigned style week 1. In any event, a full citation to the Strictly website would be better than citing to a twitter posting of the same video. Knope7 (talk) 17:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tameka Empson Week 1

Aswell as the Y VIVA espana she danced to El Gato Montes it is on the website — Preceding unsigned comment added by MidnightSilver (talk • contribs) 18:26, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please unprotect this article

Wikipedia is a site for everyone to use, regardless of whether or not they wish to set up an account. Please remove the protection to this article so that the founding principle of wikipedia can be followed by those of us who have relevant (and sourced) content to add. Thank you.61.220.162.2 (talk) 07:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to the superior editor who locked the page, you will have to beg them to be permitted to add to the article via a request to edit or some such nonsense. Give up, mate. Let them have the power. We'll all just move on with our lives, something the 'owners' of Wikipedia articles don't have.218.161.125.238 (talk) 09:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]