Talk:Monsanto
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Monsanto article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
OUTDATED -- POV
There is nothing here about Monsanto losing court cases because it fraudulently misrepresented terminator genes as effective when they aren't. There is nothing here about the current outing that GMOs don't provide greater yield than non GMOs. There is nothing here about farmer lawsuits about Roundup pesticide causing cancer. This makes the article NOT NEUTRAL. Please fix the POV issues with this article. 100.15.120.122 (talk) 12:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Court cases are covered in Monsanto legal cases. If you have reliable sources covering cases or information that isn't in that article (or this one) point the sources out on the talk page and we can discuss their addition to the article.Dialectric (talk) 12:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Economic Impact
1. When discussing the controversies outside the U.S, the article went at length to describe the negative impacts that Monsanto has had in Argentina, yet failed to adequately mention the economic stimulus GMO crops have provided for the country's crippled economy.
2. Information on China was lacking in comparison to that of the countries. The article mentioned it was controversial, not noting any of effects that GMO soy (good or bad), has had on China. Devinb3 (talk) 19:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
disgraceful
This is a sham of an article. It's clearly written by people with an axe to grind against this company. Most if it isn't neutral in the slightest.
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class Agriculture articles
- Mid-importance Agriculture articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- C-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class St. Louis articles
- Mid-importance St. Louis articles
- C-Class Missouri articles
- Mid-importance Missouri articles
- C-Class Environment articles
- Mid-importance Environment articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press
- Articles edited by connected contributors