Jump to content

User talk:Emily Goldstein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Emily Goldstein (talk | contribs) at 23:50, 1 December 2016 (→‎November 2016). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Hello, Emily Goldstein, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! clpo13(talk) 18:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Nomination of Donald Trump's hair for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Trump's hair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump's hair until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pbp 19:02, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump's hair was speedied

@Emily Goldstein: see also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Speedy deletion while AfD still open :( + Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 October 25 --SI 19:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC) Hi Emily, could you help with the wording etc here? thx. --SI 18:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Kanye West are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 23:19, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my reverts on the 2020 election talk page. While I don't see how it is any useful or helpful for discussion, I am leaving it there; however, it does not belong on the Kanye West talk page. It has no relevance. And could you please respond to users on talk pages when reverted? Going back and forth isn't helping anyone and so is telling a user "Wrong" in every edit summary. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 23:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Kanye West for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 23:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please respond to my messages? I am getting tired of repeating the same things. Posting a video has no relevance on a talk page nor does it belong there and gives the impression of a forum. If you want it to be added, perhaps add a question to your message, such as "Do you think this should be mentioned in the article?" not by posting a video which isn't helpful and irrelevant. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 23:31, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"He goes around saying 'Trump is my all-time hero,'" the Republican candidate said of West. "He says it to everybody. So, Kanye West, I love him."
Trump added that he might rescind his admiration for West if the 21-time Grammy winner follows through on his presidential ambitions.
"Now, maybe in a few years I will have to run against him, I don't know. So I'll take that back," he said.[1]
He has been in the news recently for talking about the election during his concert and other things. Kanye and Trump may both run for president in 2020. So it is relevant to the Kanye West and 2020 election articles. Emily Goldstein (talk) 23:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sagecandor. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Fake news website without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. LINK at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fake_news_website&diff=752297612&oldid=752297371 Sagecandor (talk) 14:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you chose to break many of the links in sources in this article by removing the domain names from many citations. Sagecandor (talk) 14:38, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fake news website, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not engage in sneaky subtle vandalism by removing domain names and breaking links to many websites in citations, as you did HERE with this edit. Sagecandor (talk) 14:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing on Fake news website. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I realise going straight to indefinite sounds like cracking a sledgehammer with a nut, but I need an explanation of exactly what was going on with Fake news website before I can unblock. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a pointy edit, indeed. I hope that you have not crushed Emily with your sledgehammer, though: she makes a good point by being pointy, even if it's against the rules and can only be reverted by pushing a button or two. SashiRolls (talk) 17:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A regex similar to the one run on that page should/could be a pop-up option on every Wikipedia page (One might argue that looking at the bibliography would give a similar, though less complete, vision... SashiRolls (talk) 17:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Emily Goldstein (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sagecandor gave me two different warnings for my first edit. I wanted to add Template:POV to the article.[2] [3] Emily Goldstein (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Sagecandor gave me two different warnings for my first edit. I wanted to add [[Template:POV]] to the article.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fake_news_website&diff=752297612&oldid=752297371] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fake_news_website&diff=752297798&oldid=752297612] [[User:Emily Goldstein|Emily Goldstein]] ([[User talk:Emily Goldstein#top|talk]]) 23:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Sagecandor gave me two different warnings for my first edit. I wanted to add [[Template:POV]] to the article.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fake_news_website&diff=752297612&oldid=752297371] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fake_news_website&diff=752297798&oldid=752297612] [[User:Emily Goldstein|Emily Goldstein]] ([[User talk:Emily Goldstein#top|talk]]) 23:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Sagecandor gave me two different warnings for my first edit. I wanted to add [[Template:POV]] to the article.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fake_news_website&diff=752297612&oldid=752297371] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fake_news_website&diff=752297798&oldid=752297612] [[User:Emily Goldstein|Emily Goldstein]] ([[User talk:Emily Goldstein#top|talk]]) 23:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}