User talk:Klimgeran

Welcome!

Hello, Klimgeran, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Luca Litrico, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! J947 18:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luca Litrico

The article Luca Litrico has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. J947 18:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Luca Litrico, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Luca Litrico. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Luca Litrico, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Stop removing these maintenance templates. The article has links but very few. It has nothing to do with how many references you add. There are no article that link to it. Meters (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your most recent edits as they were including heaps of external links in the article body text, contrary to WP:External links. If you intended them to be references, see Help:Referencing for beginners. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Klimgeran, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as LucaLitrico (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Meters (talk) 02:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Luca Litrico. Changing usernames is not going to help. Stop removing this. Nothing links to this article. Meters (talk) 02:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You had already been told about misplaced external links but you added another so I have deleted it. I have also deleted your crude manually-coded attempt to add a contents list, as there is already a contents list automatically provided. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another topic about which you have been warned before is the marking of minor edits. If you understand English, please read Help:Minor edit and comply with it; if you don't understand English, you ought to stick to the Wikipedia in your own language, the Italian one if appropriate. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luca Litrico for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luca Litrico is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Litrico until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you being paid to create Luca Litrico?

You say you've been asked to create this. Are you doing this for free, as part of your job, or? Doug Weller talk 19:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

talk I'm doing this is interesting to me for free

Klimgeran (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Doug Weller talk 20:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

talk

How much money do Wikipedia need to publish the project? I thought free This is my first project on Wikipedia Klimgeran (talk) 21:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]