User talk:Ktrimi991

Welcome!

Hello, Ktrimi991, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 27 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Italian invasion of Albania page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Albanian Kingdom (1939–43) into Italian invasion of Albania. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source interpretation

Hello,

I noticed the article about Battle of Ulqin. Thank you for creation of the article on this topic.

In this article you wrote:

"The battle however sparked a debate in Europe which raised the question regarding the Albanian question"

You supported this assertion with two citations. I checked both of them, and I could not find that any of them support the above assertion. They actually almost do not mention the battle of Ulcinj, nor they give it the kind of importance presented in the above sentence. Will you please be so kind to present quotes from two sources you used to cite above assertion.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for removing (diff) assertion you added based on the misinterpretation of two sources. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was no misinterpretation, I have found one single ref but when writing article I placed two other sources by mistake. I will find the ref again and add assertion. During this time I thought it is better to have text removed than tagged with "citation needed". I hope you don't have any problem with it. Ktrimi991 (talk) 18:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of course not. Everybody make mistakes. Gezuar.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Te gjithe te mirat Antidiskriminator! Ktrimi991 (talk) 14:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Your addition to Albanian nobility was detected by a bot as being a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki, not even temporarily. — Diannaa (talk) 16:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have already removed it! Ktrimi991 (talk) 15:16, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GHEG VARIANT

WHY DO YOU REVERT, GHEG ALB‑ANI‑AN ? KOFTË SÊË JÊË SHQIPTARË UN KAMÊTË XHETË

ͰΑΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣ‑ϒΣ (dôr.) ΗΤϷΑΝΑΝΘΕΣ‑ΟΣ (att.) ͿΗϷΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜƏ Α̃ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔͿƏ ΝΕΜΖΑΓƏ - حطشأنانث يشأعليهوسعلۋ أمنجزهدي نهمزاگ (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Une jam shqiptar dhe krenar, ndersa ti duhet te jesh ndonje dreq ose lugat anti-shqiptar qe kerkon percarje. Vetem nje i tille shton dialektin geg aty ku eshte gjuha shqipe qe eshte pa dallime krahinore apo zonale. Shqiptaret dhe shqipja jane nje dhe te pandashem, ndryshe nga cfare kerkon ti te shfaqesh. Njerez te trashe si ti ta shpifin. Ktrimi991 (talk) 11:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UN JAMË QRÊGWË GEG‑ÔN‑ISTÊS SHKUPJAN,
E SǏ TË VAZHDOJSH ME FSHI FJALT ORGINAL (ATTESTAM ME KITAB),
JO FALSIFIKUM PREJ DO TREÐTAR,
KOMUNISTA GLUP, T'ENWERIT THIVIË DÉÉRRË TɕIFUTË ZÔNJA BIRATË TË KURVËSË,
KI ME PÄS PROBLEM ME ALLAHIN & ME ZOTIN… 
TAË DIƩ, SÊ TË NEMA, MÊ MAFIË, MÊ LUTJATË Ê MÊLAKAVË

TOSK ROMAK ƩTɕIPTAR (≡ PTERO PUTRO),
N'ITALIË SHKONIË (TSHATJË Ë KI SHTËPIJËN SHPJUNË)... 

UN JAM ƩɕYPË‑TARË, 
Ë NUK E DU TOSQAR HIN IQ !

Ë TSHAJ SHKA E FSHINË NGUHËN TÊMÊ,
NÃNËS & BÄBËS,
UN VÊTË BAJ SHMOZ MI FSHIË,
MÊ KNAQËSIË

A NITÊ ?
A JO ?

GAZMÊND (KËRCNIM ARBI‑IƩΘË) ARIFI (AL‑TANI) THIRNA DJALI ZENUNIT QARANOS MAQEDÔNË !
NAMUR MARATA JETOJ,
NUKË MA NINË IQ,
KURRË MOSË TË PAVSHAË…
EDHÊ KURRË MOS STË FOLSHNA MÃË
ͰΑΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣ‑ϒΣ (dôr.) ΗΤϷΑΝΑΝΘΕΣ‑ΟΣ (att.) ͿΗϷΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜƏ Α̃ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔͿƏ ΝΕΜΖΑΓƏ - حطشأنانث يشأعليهوسعلۋ أمنجزهدي نهمزاگ (talk) 12:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duket sa i merakosur je per dialektin geg dhe per cdo vlere tjeter te patjetersueshme te nje populli qe ne menyren me krenare te mundshme ka luftuar per shekuj ndaj krimbash te llojeve te ndryshme, perfshi ata te llojit tend, njerez si puna jote qe beni sikur doni kulturen shqiptare por qe ne fakt thjesh shpini uje ne mullirin e armikut, budallenj me fjale te tjera. Ne vend qe te hiqesh si patriot me mire shkruaj dicka per kulturen shqiptare, per zakonet ose vlerat fetare. Me mire kontribo per dicka me vlere se sa te vish dhe te ngjyrosesh faqen time me lojera fjalesh. Meqe ra fjala o patriot i flakte, o njeri qe beson ne Zot, pse perdor shkronja greko-sllave per te shkruajtur dialektin geg, mos ndoshta te duken me te mira se "shkronjat e Enverit"? Mirembetsh! Ktrimi991 (talk) 13:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Balkan topics are covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBMAC

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 EdJohnston (talk) 15:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

After narrowly avoiding a block for personal attacks on 4 September, as of 11 September you are busy edit-warring at Albania. Be aware that you can be banned from editing about Albania or Albanians under the discretionary sanctions if you show no sign of waiting for consensus. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period may also be taken as evidence of edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior. I reverted another editor's edit twice and asked to take their concerns to the talk. Then the editor explained on the talk why they believe Mother Teresa's image should be removed from article. I can't understand why do you see problems here, I am not "busy edit-warring at Albania", I just undid unexplained edit twice. Your comment here, although with aim to help me, was really unhelpful and unpleasant. Thank you, best regards! Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo 2015 games

Thanks for this correction. I totally discarded the year 2015 and assumed the event to somehow be in the future still. --OJ (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit OJ! No one had noticed article needed update expect of you. I try to edit as much as I can during my limited free time and because of this sometimes I make mistakes. That is why Wikipedia needs as many editors as possible, to help and assist each other. Best regards! Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Old City Hammam (Mitrovica), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mitrovica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revert frenzy

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Upper Blateštičko Lake. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Zoupan 22:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just one edit is not "a revert frenzy"! Ktrimi991 (talk) 23:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MilosHaran

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, MilosHaran, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't created by me. Thanks. Ktrimi991 (talk) 22:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ktrimi991. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Please note that I am not in any sort of edit war, but am constantly being followed around by a very obsessive and very biased editor (Zoupan), who reverts any of my attempts which try to break away from the Serbian nationalist propaganda that is systematically being spewed on any Montenegro-related articles. Please try to understand the issue before threatening me with suspensions, I've been here for ten years and am well aware of the rules, but will not back down from trying to put facts in articles just because there is an other side which is utterly wrong, but also very loud and persistent. Cheers. Sideshow Bob 07:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sideshow Bob! I warned both Zoupan and you and I suggest you discuss the matter talk page. I don't see a single source within article to support Zoupan and Anastan. By the way which Montenegro-related articles do you see are mostly vandalised? I would have a look on them and help to find consensus. If possible sent me a list via email [1]. Best regards! Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

I noticed that you added text in which you described a living person as nationalist (diff). I propose you to reword the sentence you added to refer to author's book, not to him personally. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 23:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits or that you are in some way connected to Albania or Albanians related articles.

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Albania and Albanians related topics and are organized within WikiProject Albania.
I thought that you may be interested in viewing the current tasks of our WikiProject or its talk page and get involved. Furthermore, if you are interested in joining the wikiproject, please feel free to add your name in the Participants' page!.

Thank you and, again, welcome among us!

--Antidiskriminator (talk) 23:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning-bombing

I would kindly ask you to stop warning-bombing my talk page. If you would care to know how things are done here on WP, the category-removal needs to be explained on the talk, and not the other way around. The article is reliably sourced.--Zoupan 05:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't edit war in multiply articles. Ktrimi991 (talk) 21:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian historiography

Hi,

I noticed you removed text with multiple citaions (diff) with the following excuse: "see Serbian historiography". The ethnicity of authors is, of course, an invalid reason for removal of cited text. Please revert yourself.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Antidiskriminator, the ethnicity of authors is an invalid reason but the unreliability of the Serbian historiography of that period is a very valid reason. Isn't this [2] a part of WP:NPA#WHATIS? Report yourself. Ktrimi991 (talk) 00:10, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you again removed cited text with ethnicity based arguments (diff) and (diff). I already explained you that ethnicity of authors is, of course, an invalid reason for removal of cited text. Please don't repeat such actions.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:03, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reason was explained to you by multiply editors. Don't repeat your refusal to take the point. Ktrimi991 (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You were explained more than once that ethnicity based excuses for removal of cited text is invalid and that you should seek consensus at RSN instead. This edit (diff) is an example that instead to follow wikipedia rules you opted to refuse to get the point. That is not constructive. Will you please be so kind to revert yourself and seek consensus at RSN for your position.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Community of Serb Municipalities

OR. The boycott doesn't make them automatically with a Serb majority. Some of municipalities have Albanian mayors. WP:OR?? Isn't it obvious that the Community of Serb Municipalities will only include Serb-majority municipalities? That is the whole purpose. Do you have any reliable sources that the association will include municipalities that don't have a Serb majority? In 2013 ECMI calculated the Serb community numbers — all included municipalities indeed have Serb majority (61–99%). I'm very curious about the Albanian mayors, inform me.--Zoupan 22:46, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Ljeviš

The native name is Serbian. Богородица Љевишка is in Serbian. This is the native name. "Kisha e Shën Premtës" is not the native name, but an Albanian translation (with 0 hits on Gbooks). As far as I know, the Serbian Orthodox Church does not use Albanian as a liturgical language, and there are no Orthodox Albanians in Prizren. The infobox has the parameters native name and sr. Don't. The Albanian name is already in the lead.--Zoupan 12:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you cite Wikipedia policy on the matter? Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ktrimi991 reported by User:Anastan (Result: ). Thank you. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 17:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Banja, Skenderaj

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EdJohnston! I do not you or someone else to unblock me. No! I know what to do, just say "I will be more careful next time" and that is all. But No! An IP reverted my edits and disrupted my talk page. Materialscientist and Jim1138 reverted them. The IP was blocked and Jim1138 warned me they would attack me again. Minutes later another IP reverted me [3]. Some minutes later Anastan warned me. I am not filing a SPI because Anastan is becoming redundant and I do not want to give them much attention. An editor who constantly calls me and my work with unpleasant and inappropriate words and who comes after me all the time (one has just to see their history) is not the right person to collaborate with. However I do not plan to give them attention. I have seen numerous situations where editors from the Balkans, including me, have reverted each other (even edit war) but no report in the end. Do you know why EdJohnston? Because the Balkans topics are considered "hot" topics and sometimes people lose their nerve for a moment. And when your work is attacked my more than one IP you may not do your best. Moreover we are human beings EdJohnston. An editor who extensively works on such "hot" topics could be at least let to justify their actions. In the last months numerous experienced editors who have been important to the Balkans topics have said "Ciao" to Wikipedia. The most important factor is arguably the admins with their actions or lack of actions. What I want from you is to be as careful as you can when interacting with new editors keen on the Balkans topics. They are so few editors active that most of the articles have not been changed for months and years. I consider this block a period of time given to me to prepare new stuff. I am planning to give a new face to articles on settlements of Kosovo. If you are interested help me, if not at least think twice before you interrupt my editing process. Have a nice day EdJohnston and let me know there is a discussion concerning my actions before you act in a rush! Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There was not ethnic warring. We don use alternative names of cities of Kosovo on village articles. There are some agreements which must be respected. You said I warred on Albanian versus Serbian names at Our Lady of Ljeviš; everything was discussed on the talk. I see these childish mistakes. See my edits in numerous articles, they are being reverted by various IP. Is not this a problem? Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]