User talk:Velella

This talk page contents prior to 26th April 2017 have been archived. Please feel free to start new discussions below. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rev. Prof. Prem Saran Satsangi

Hi Velella,

The information you are deleting on the page is sourced to the the Original Article, Systems movement:Autobiographical Retrospectives published in the International Journal of General Systems (Ref: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03081070500422869?src=recsys) and has been suitably referenced. The edits at the moment make the remainder of the text look out of context. Please advice.

Regards, Qncs --Qncs (talk) 18:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chaucer

I filed the AIV. David in DC (talk) 21:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I had to take an hour out there. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Louise Gittleman

Hi Velella, I just wanted to let you know, I inserted the speedy deletion template on the "Ann Louise Gittleman" page. Mnh429 (talk) 22:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of that, but it does not justify the misuse of this speedy deletion process. Therefore I removed the template. This is not an appropriate way to pursue a disagreement about content. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:59, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Bedowyn

Hello Velella. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bedowyn, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: having a song featured in a notable video game indicates significance. Thank you. So Why 19:35, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Destination Imagination

Hi, I'm not an admin, just a prod patroller checking the prods every day. The AFD should have been highlighted on the talkpage by the closing admin in 2008 as that is the correct procedure but for some reason it wasn't done or was deleted, having it highlighted on the talkpage is a quick way to check, previous prods should be highlighted there as well but very rarely are. I have no view on the article except that it is presently non-notable and would suggest AFD, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 21:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon sustained competitive advantage

I don't know if you noticed, but this page was recreated after it was speedy deleted by me. I deleted it on the basis that the author requested deletion (G7). I assumed that they had given up with the project, so I did not give any consideration to your A11 speedy request. You might want to consider reinstating the speedy tag, depending on how you now feel about the article. SpinningSpark 14:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will take another look. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 15:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Landon Newsom

I made a mistake while creating the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landon_Newsom and it was listed for deletion because I hadn't finished putting notable references on the page. I've added those references to appearances of her music on MTV and 90210 as well as guest vocals on The Used album among other things. Can you reconsider your position on deletion please?

I believe that it is always best for other editors to form a view independent of the nominator. I am content to let the AfD run its course. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SINGER NEEL NAIK

Don't delete this information please cause this is my own and it's real information NEEL75 NAIK (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket Software

Hi Velella, I have altered the Rocket Software page in the following ways: (1) I have removed most citations that link to Rocket's website, and (2) I have added several third party citations. If these adjustments are to your satisfaction, please remove the tags. Thank you. Aaron verb (talk) 17:45, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Aaron_verb[reply]

Hello again, Velella. To follow up to my previous message: I'd like to request again that you take a look at the Rocket Software page that you tagged for tone and notability. I believe that you'll find that the page, as it currently stands, resembles the pages of any software company of comparable size. If you have any further concerns, please let me know what you'd like me to fix. Thank you. Aaron verb (talk) 19:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the tag and the material that it referenced. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 07:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Addition NaOH Baume'

Please Addition my baume' formula Plabon sarker (talk) 20:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit had no supporting sources, made no sense on its own and was misplaced in the article. Please gain some more experience with Wikipedia doing small corections and adding relevant and good sources to unsourced text. That should help in enabling more significant additions like the test edit that you made on Sodium hydroxide. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:10, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved back to draft:Odoi Yemoh

Hello Velella, You moved this(deleted page)back to draft Odoi Yemoh. I appreciate your work in helping to ensure articles meet standards. After following a couple of links for article review. I ended up on the help chat platform where I posted the link to the article. I was given some feedback which suggested that I take out some references as they were simply profiles or announcements. It was also suggested that some sentences were 'unencyclopedic'. After delaing with the above issues, I moved it into mainspace. Did I miss a step? Sorry to bother you as I'm pretty new to Wikipedia. Manuelodoi (talk) 04:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you missed the critical step. Unreviewed articles moved directly from Draft to mainspace are at serious risk of deletion. Draft articles are protected against deletion unless they are overtly promotional, copyright violations or defamatory. When a draft is ready for main space it should be submitted for review and it is up to other, uninvolved and experienced editors to agree whether it is ready for main space. I note that the article is still at Draft. In general it is much better to go to articles for creation to create new articles where it will tagged appropriately. However, I have submitted your article for review. You may still amend it while it is at review. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 07:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Livia Nichifor

Dear Velella, I thank you wholeheartedly for the message! I pray you with all my heart to help me edit my article Livia Nichifor correctly. Below I send you relevant additional data. Faithfully Yours, Al Balint--Al Balint (talk) 13:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Whole content of article posted by Al Balint deleted by Velella)

Regrettably none of that satisfies any claim for notability. Please read the Wikipedia notability guidelines for a more lucid explantation of what it is exactly that sources have to establish. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:32, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(More new content of article posted by Al Balint deleted by Velella)

It isn't me you need to convince. This material should be in the article or posted on the article talk page. Nobody else reads this page and I always leave it to other, uninvolved, editors to make decisions about deletions that I have proposed. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You, the material is now in the article and on the article talk page. Faithfully Yours, --Al Balint (talk) 16:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Velella, I do not know Pafsanias , Wintereu, Snichifor and Serbannichifor.--Al Balint (talk) 14:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--Al Balint (talk) 13:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Velella,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 804 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Alli Armstrong

Hello Velella. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alli Armstrong, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: hosting a show on a notable channel indicates significance. Thank you. So Why 10:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed that this article be deleted Makrifat Cinta:

Have provided enough references for the movie. Please check before requesting for deletion.

Please feel free to let me know if you need any more queries about the movie. I am here to help you out.

Refs belong on the article page , not here. The references you have added are not in-line references and many appear to be press releases, youtube refs etc which are not acceptable references. Please remove all references that are not truly independent and published by a reliable sources. Those that remain should be properly cited as in-line references so that readers can see what part of the text the references are supposed to support. Then, and only then, will I review the article. Unless the quality improves, it remains at risk of deletion. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is a movie. So the movie will have press releases and interviews. The movie boasts about a star studded and award winning cast and crew. They have linked the movie page to their wikipedia profile too. I have linked their profile too. You can check their wikipedia page too for reference. No actors will give press release without working in the movie. There has been enough evidences that the movie is happening and there has been lot of noise around the movie. You didnt go through the links which I have shared in the reference section. All the top media websites have covered the movie and they have written articles. Those websites are not self editable or editable by public. So they carry only authentic information. Articles which they carry in their website is all authentic. You can reliable sources to verify that too. Request you to read those before deleting or proposing for deletion. Also when there is a content added by someone, respect them and their content. I spent my quality time in adding information, so that others will be benefitted about it. Thats what Wiki is all about.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hari 2914 (talk • contribs) 06:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I certainly did go through the links, hence my comments above. Please read WP:GNG to understand the relationship between references and notability on Wikipedia. Press releases count for nothing and a "lot of noise" counts for even less. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 08:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of past AfDs

Hey, I just saw your comment at WT:Deletion process about not have a list of past AfDs. If the title is the same as the past AfDs, using the "What Links Here" tool should help. It will even show links coming in to a deleted article without needing to be an admin, see [1]. While its not perfect, in that you would need to check before your AfD manually, it does give you one option. Monty ₈₄₅ 03:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I hadn't thought to try that. It still omits the recreations with slightly different capitalisation which the bot seems to be able to spot, but it is certainly a significant help. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 08:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Lorena Maraschi

Hello Velella. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lorena Maraschi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Subject might be important/significant (see also Google News/Books hits for this subject) / use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead to allow other editors to participate in this decision. Thank you. So Why 19:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Quick work on the 'sock'-ing El cid, el campeador (talk) 17:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I was just getting fed up with kids playing here and wasting our time. Why couldn't they go and kick a football around instead, like kids used to do ?! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion/Samira Khan Mahi

Dear Velella, I am giving 3 references : 1. http://thedailytribunal.net The Daily Tribunal - This is renowned news paper of Bangladesh.Please visit the website for more details. This is not a blog.

2. http://www.thedailystar.net The Daily Star - This is alos renowned news paper of Bangladesh.Please visit the website for more details. Please also check epaper of today is available in website. This is not a blog.

3. http://thedailynewnation.com The New Nation - This is also renowned news paper of Bangladesh.Please visit the website for more details. Please also check epaper of today is available in website. This is not a blog.

All above references is leading newspaper of Bangladesh. Why are you commented this is only blogs and other Bangladesh actress/actor already create his/her Wikipedia page with reference to above news papers. Please check other celebrities pages of Bangladesh.

Whether or not other celebrities have pages here is not relevant to notability. I will let other editors decide on the merits of this case. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sareen Sports Industries (AfD)

Hi Valella! Any chance you can have another look at the article above, and, if you think the issues you raised earlier have now been addressed, remove the AfD tag? (It has been up for consideration for a while, now.) If not, is there anything you would recommend to improve the article? Thank you. By the way, I agree with your other AfD, for the article about the SS Ton, and I think that page is moving in the direction of being deleted, or at least merged with the page about the parent company Sareen. Climate7298 (talk) 01:31, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Sutter speedy deletion

Hi Velella,

I don't believe the wikipedia page I created Sam Sutter, should be speedily deleted from wikipedia. If you visit the page List of Mayors of Fall River, Massachusetts, you will find that, including Sam Sutter, four of the last five elected mayors of Fall River, Massachusetts have pages of their own. Fall River is one of the most populous cities in Massachusetts; thus, its mayors are significant public figures who are deserving of their own pages. Anyone interested in learning more about the history of city politics would certainly want to learn about the former heads of its municipal government. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Css1990x (talk • contribs) 01:51, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Sadie Vidal

Hello Velella. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sadie Vidal, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: being a major party candidate for a parliamentary seat indicates significance. Thank you. So Why 09:52, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. There was no evidence that she was in fact selected by the Constituency party for the seat. Now at AfD as failing WP:POLITICIAN Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re Jet Cards

The jet card page is missing about 20 relevant companies. I created links from the Wikipedia Jet Card page to the appropriate page on each company website thinking that would be 100% verifiable -- It seems that having a page missing 80% of the relevant information is not very useful to users. How can I help in improving the page?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_card

Thanks, Doug — Preceding unsigned comment added by Douggollan (talk • contribs) 02:55, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion should properly on the article talk page and not here. However, the brief answer is that however notable or not Jet card is, the companies that you are linking are not notable. You seem to be confusing Wikipedia as an encyclopaedia with a commercial site. It isn't. There is neither a requirement to list the companies involved nor is it in any way desirable. Wikipedia is not an advertising site for Jet cards. As an editor with a conflict of interest on this subject, you should not be editing this page or associated pages at all. On a separate issue, please can you re-instate your COI declaration (without all the promotional guff) on your user page. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 08:24, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think I am dense, but if I look up a page on airlines, there is a comprehensive list of airlines -- see below

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_airlines_of_the_United_States

Hi Velella, If I wanted to see a list of aviation companies offering a jet card - where do I find them? I would think if there is a jet card page on Wikipedia, I would want an 'encyclopedic' list of those companies. As I know who they are - I thought - if I provided the list with direct reference to their website (proving they offer a jet card) that would be OK, but I understand not.

Would another way to find a 3rd party reference I was not involved in (I am an expert in private aviation writing for Forbes) that mentions that company and that they offer jet cards and provide a link to that. I use Wikipedia ALL the time - it is invaluable and it drives me crazy to see a page about something I know a lot about that is so lacking and not correct. I am just trying to help. Thanks, Doug — Preceding unsigned comment added by Douggollan (talk • contribs) 09:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As noted above, please discuss on the article talk page and not here. Nobody except you and me read this page. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:53, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for Deletion

Hey there, would you be able to give me good reasons why you nominated my article for deletion? Also, you deleted a large chunk of information/facts that took awhile to put up, they were relevant and factual information. Thanks.~~noahtyrell~~ Noahtyrell (talk) 13:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)noahtyrell[reply]

Noahtyrell The text I deleted was extreme promotional puffery and text supported only by the personal web-site of the article subject. Neither type of material is acceptable on Wikipedia. I nominated it for deletion because the person did not appear, IMHO, to be notable. Please read WP:GNG to see why. Incidentally all of this was included in the edit summaries and in the nomination - not sure why I need to repeat my views here. Perhaps you could explain. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 15:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this is my first article I have made before and did not realise your comments were in the history of the page. I have removed the 'gushing' self-promotional information and provided more reliable refs. By the way, just a tip; maybe you should not be so harsh with your 'constructive criticism'. Thanks.~~noahtyrell~~

go away

mmmmmmm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymlancs (talk • contribs) 00:27, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]