User talk:Rowanis12

May 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Battle of Brunanburh has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of Brunanburh was changed by Rowanis12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853916 on 2016-05-14T15:54:08+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:54, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rowanis12, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rowanis12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to Battle of Brunanburh

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Brunanburh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! HGilbert (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi Rowanis12. Please stop adding unreferenced info to infoboxes. The stuff that goes into these infoxboes is supposed to be referenced from a reliable sources, and is supposed to be found in the article itself.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Anegawa

added links pointing to Tokugawa and Oda

Battle of Nagashino

added links pointing to Tokugawa and Oda

Battle of Maol Ruadh

added a link pointing to Rebel

Battle of Okehazama

added a link pointing to Mikawa

Battle of Preston (1648)

added a link pointing to Parliamentarian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Cannae infobox

Infobox contents should reflect the content of articles. You changed the content of the infobox despite the hidden and inline notes asking that words such as "Decisive" be avoided, because they're contentious and likely to mislead or confuse the issue for most readers. There have been several article talk-page discussions on the topic; please read them, as they currently reflect a consensus on the issue. The military infobox guidelines are also clear on this point. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 09:04, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced info

Please stop adding unsourced/unreferenced information (e.g. number of troops deployed in battles) to the infoboxes of said battles. This site and its information is not based on pure speculation. Wikipedia is trying to stay true to sources, and if we do not have a number of these battles, then it shall be "unknown". I went through all of your edits to see if any of them hasn't been reverted yet, and reverted them myself. If you do find a reliable source for any of your changes, please cite them. See the referencing for beginners tutorial if you need help for that. Thank you! RazielZero (talk) 10:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Stirling Bridge, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please cite sources and use edit summaries. Eric ^talk 14:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Tours, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kelven99874 (talk) 15:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 12:30, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note to other administrators: a conditional unblock might be a solution here if the editor will agree to stay away from articles dealing with battles. Edits such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Hattin&type=revision&diff=723570804&oldid=723200237 these two) are typical of the problem with this SPA. Doug Weller talk 13:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]