User talk:Hmanck

I just realised that no one has welcomed you yet in your 1 1⁄2 years of editing WIkipedia... Epicgenius (talk) 19:00, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Hmanck. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Epicgenius (talk) 19:00, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fulton Center

Excuse me, could you add a link to a source regarding this paragraph? Thanks in advance. Vcohen (talk) 11:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a plethora of information on the subject of the Fulton Center. Here is a link to the official site map from the MTA, indicating the presence of a "R/E" connector. Note it says connector, suggesting a free transfer. Older material from both official and unofficial sources point to a physical transfer, but would not be completed before the opening of the flagship building at Fulton Street. As for the passageway goes, there are video renderings from official sources (the MTA), the developers and media that there is a set of barriers on the Broadway side of the passageway, leading to the passageway itself, therefore indicating it is not free. This information is entirely a summary of previous statements on the Wiki article, which have links to various sources. Hmanck (talk) 11:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I need sources for two particular statements: 1) "there will be no free transfer between the Fulton Street and Cortlandt Street stations" and 2) "the BMT Cortlandt Street station will have a free transfer to the World Trade Center station". As of now, all articles related to the Fulton Center show the future list of served trains as 2345ACEJNRZ, as if the planned transfer were connecting all of them. I know it's wrong, I want to fix these articles, but I need a reliable source for that. Vcohen (talk) 12:37, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Footnote 16 of the article indicates that the passageway is outside of fare control. There's no transfer planned between the stations on either side of the passageway. Hmanck (talk) 14:20, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll try to rely on it. Vcohen (talk) 14:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The MTA in its feis statement, in chapter 3, concluded that because church street and Broadway are busy traffic arterials, it would have been more wise to construct said passageway as an unpaid to maximize pedestrian flow. it would allow a continent stream of access from the wtc complex to the Fulton street complex.

Thanks. Vcohen (talk) 17:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to figure out this question by asking a well-informed user. His only error is about the 1, isn't it? Vcohen (talk) 07:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WTC Transportation Hub and the Fulton Center are related but entirely different contracts and projects. As said by the user, the WTC Transportation Hub primarily deals with transportation pre-existing at the World Trade Center, essentially a major upgrade from pre-2001 conditions. With that I mean, the WTC Hub will have the 1, E and R lines. It is a MOSTLY-PA project. It is intended primarily to bring an easy-finding transit hub, of which the primary focus is the PATH. In pre-2001 times, commuters would have to enter through WTC buildings, through an underground concourse/mall to reach that. With the destruction of said buildings and infrastructure, it was proposed to give the PATH station more modern amenities, and therefore the idea of the WTC Hub was hatched. As it is a MOSTLY-PA project, there are some contracts during the construction of the hub that would impact NYCS service, especially the 1 line, which bisects it. It is intended that there will be the integration of the 1, E, R lines into the hub. There are no proposals to give free transfers to the 1 from the E, R or the Fulton Street Station lines.

Because the 1 lies under Greenwich Street, a little to the west of Church Street (where the R runs), it is not directly connected to the Fulton Center complex. It lies outside of the MTA contracts as part of the Fulton Center, and therefore is NOT included. Hmanck (talk) 12:13, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks a lot. Vcohen (talk) 12:18, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article 42nd Street Shuttle, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 14:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:20, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mass Rapid Transit System (Chennai)

In re your request to protect a section, there is no such thing - it's all or nothing in protection. This apppears to be a content dispute rather than vandalism, thus no real good to reason to protect the article. You can always make another request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection Skier Dude (talk) 01:23, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited West Street pedestrian bridges, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winter Garden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:57, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil Scripts

May I ask you how you are familiar with Tamil scripts ([1]) of Chennai Metro, given that you claimed to be a non-local throughout the discussions at Chennai MRTS and especially, in your argument ([2]) in the discussion regarding tamil names, where you made statements that seemed to convey an opinion from a person who doesn't know tamil. --Anbu121 (talk me) 23:57, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Tamil for the Chennai Metro edit, I simply went over to the Tamil version of the page and copied the title. I assume that it was Tamil based on the shape of the characters used for the Chennai MRTS system. Knowing some Indian geography and the demographics, I understand one of the lingua franca used in the Chennai area is Tamil. But yes, I do not know Tamil at all. H-Man (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sorry if my enquiry seems to be in a suspective tone. Actually, there was consensus made on WikiProject India Notice board not to have local scripts in the lead section of an article. --Anbu121 (talk me) 00:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battery Park City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Metropolitan Transportation Authority

West Street pedestrian bridges (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 130 Liberty Street

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For initiating the team work and coming forward to help upgrade the article Chennai MRTS, especially during the time when the article reached a stalemate. You are indeed a Good Samaritan! Thank you a lot on behalf of the people of Chennai. Rasnaboy (talk) 17:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

10 Hudson Yards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Metropolitan Transportation Authority and Fairway

30 Hudson Yards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Hudson Yards Redevelopment Project (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Eleventh Avenue

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work on the Hudson Yards articles Epicgenius (talk) 16:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

15 Hudson Yards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Metropolitan Transportation Authority

35 Hudson Yards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Metropolitan Transportation Authority

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to World Trade Center (PATH station) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Work at Cortlandt Street station #1 train continues above ground at WTC Transportation Hub]</ref>)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gilded Chopsticks may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

also comes across the [[Yongzheng Emperor|Fourth Imperial Prince Yinzhen]] played by [[Ben Wong]]), whom he instantly gets along with.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:25, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited World Trade Center (PATH station), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Ferry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gilded Chopsticks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shifu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

55 Hudson Yards

This is an article that was recently featured at Did You Know, so please be careful with it. I would suggest a split discussion on the article talk page first. Thanks, 50.14.142.33 (talk) 22:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Alpha Phi Omega chapters (chronological)

added a link pointing to St. John's University

List of Alpha Phi Omega chapters (geographical)

added a link pointing to St. John's University

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Phi Omega updates

Thank you for the work updating the chapter lists, the chronological still need work updating the changes over the last couple of years including chapters going inactive, I think. I probably need to take the list of actives according apo.org and compare to the article and work from there...Naraht (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good call, I did see also a request to merge the two tables together. Do you that would be a good idea while we check the active status of each chapter? H-Man (talk) 18:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Manhattan West

Template:Manhattan West has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hmanck. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]