Talk:Cannabidiol

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cannabidiol.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cannabidiol article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 60 days

Pharmacology C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cannabis C‑class High‑importance

	Cannabis portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs C‑class (defunct)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Medicine C‑class Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Autism C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Legal status in the US: schedule I or unregulated?

The current sidebar states that it's Schedule I in the US. However, the main legal section Cannabidiol#U.S. seems to imply that it's legal and unregulated. This seems semi-contradictory and could use some expert attention to explain what exactly the legal situation is. --Gwern (contribs) 00:02 20 March 2017 (GMT)

I've added an intro paragraph to that section explaining that CBD is a Schedule I drug and illegal at the federal level. The whole section still needs more work. For example, the Agricultural Act of 2014 only allows hemp to be grown for research purposes by universities and state department of agriculture. Right now, the section seems to imply that it legalized hemp (and therefore CBD).

Also, I'm not sure why Utah is the only state that gets its own paragraph. The paragraph should probably be re-written to address all of the state-level laws regarding CBD in a general sense. --Surachit (talk) 03:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Counterfeits

I'm curious about the reasoning behind this revision [1]. It seems to introduce a pov skew that hemp oil is counterfeit cbd (which is not found in the reference, so wouldn't that be OR?), and it puts some undue emphasis on the Stanley brothers (the documentary is about medical cannabis and cbd... Why insert an advertisement for the Stanley brothers in this article?). 68.186.26.225 (talk) 22:07, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection all that hemp oil stuff is undue/incidental - so removed. I don't see any "advertisement". Gupta's item was on Charlotte Figi and Charlotte's Web.r Alexbrn (talk) 07:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexbrn: Can you please restore your removal of ===Counterfeits===. --Jilja (talk) 09:17, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine now I think. This hemp oil content doesn't belong in this article (if anywhere, really). Alexbrn (talk) 09:19, 17 October 2017 (UTC); amended 19:57, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexbrn:Don't you understand that hemp oil is sold as CBD oil? Can you help here @Doc James:? --Jilja (talk) 06:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What I see is that some years ago the Hemp Industry Association claimed "confusion" in order to boost its own product ("It’s very nutritious"), and this was only covered in ultra-weak sources. It's completely undue unless can show sourcing that shows it enhances our understanding of CBD - which is meant to be the topic of this article. Alexbrn (talk) 07:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexbrn: Can we add this source?: "2016 Warning Letters and Test Results for Cannabidiol-Related Products".a number of products are marketed as containing certain amounts of CBD, but don't^[1]

References

^ Commissioner, Office of the. "Public Health Focus - 2016 Warning Letters and Test Results for Cannabidiol-Related Products". www.fda.gov.

Looks useful - a number of products are marketed as containing certain amounts of CBD, but don't. Alexbrn (talk) 13:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexbrn: Thanks. Can you please add it for me? I don't want it to be biased. --Jilja (talk) 18:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexbrn: I added it, with your sentance. Thanks. --Jilja (talk) 22:55, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I already had. Alexbrn (talk) 05:10, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Medical use and Research sections

Their content seems to evoke an indistinguishable theme. Both talk about research and current preparations available. Should they be molded into one section? Mangokeylime (talk) 02:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

World Health Organization report on CBD

Some articles covering it:

World Health Group: Pot's CBD Has Health Benefits. By Kathleen Doheny. Dec. 15, 2017. WebMD. "The experts produced the report in November, while the WHO announced its conclusions this week. In May, the committee will study cannabis and cannabis-related substances more fully."
Medical Marijuana's Main Ingredient Isn't Dangerous or Addictive, World Health Organization Report Says. By Melina Delkic. Dec. 14, 2017. Newsweek.
CBD Has No Health Risks Claims World Health Organization. By Terry Hacienda. Dec 16, 2017. The Fresh Toast.

The full report:

CANNABIDIOL (CBD) Pre-Review Report. Agenda Item 5.2. Expert Committee on Drug Dependence. Thirty-ninth Meeting. Geneva, 6-10 November 2017. World Health Organization.

I will not have the time or energy to incorporate any of this into the article. But I thought I would drop off a few articles, and the full report link. --Timeshifter (talk) 15:09, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the section covering Leweke, Schubart and antipsychotic properties?

Dear Jytdog et al.,

After "Revision as of 03:53, 10 July 2017" https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cannabidiol&diff=789866677&oldid=789858007 this disappeared: "There is tentative evidence that CBD has an anti-psychotic effect, but research in this area is limited.[19][20]"

What happened?

Thank you, Listenforgood

[1] Commissioner, Office of the. "Public Health Focus - 2016 Warning Letters and Test Results for Cannabidiol-Related Products". www.fda.gov.

[1]