Jump to content

User talk:Like street

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Like street (talk | contribs) at 08:36, 19 July 2018 (→‎Mathematics in Reflection). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Hello, Like street, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
The submission appears to be written in Russian. This is the English Language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English Language. Please provide a high-quality English Language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the Russian Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 11:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Like street! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mathematical solution (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 08:41, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

senk -_-.

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Like street! I'm CASSIOPEIA. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:18, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

like street

Nean (talk) 19:45, 14 July 2018 (UTC).®_©,[reply]

caps

= mathematical reflections =

I will ask not much about mathematics. And I'll start perhaps with that, but it is precisely the unsolved problem of the millennium about problem class' P versus NP problem'. and if short, and maybe just shorter, though not much, but probably worth give something to your attention and notice this given column I have drawn. for that I will be very grateful to you and I'm grateful. Thank you. As for the verification of the correctness of the solution of the equation pertaining to paragraph 'P versus NP problem', then please,  suppose now in this way: .. 1-: imagine that every number has some kind of its own definite figure and also for of every number. 2-: let it be, and how to call it? _ Well, for example, perhaps a digital name, Or maybe a digital sequence or a given number, an  or his own digital matriatic reality. who will be more convenient. m, -3-: as is known the figure '0 'is zero, this is the only figure in its image that does not change, the figure is not solvability, existing either as an addition to a certain number. in order to increase it, either it exists only in the most digital manifold of equations, ziffr itself as a given, when solving such problems where it is the only number. The figure 0 ° does not change the fundamental function of the equation. in certain categories. izv. Well, if you take, then b 4e -: and again, imagine that every number has a so-called own  digital podpist. And I imagine it like this: a): take, for example, the figure of 5 °. and we solve here such problem - ° 5 = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 = 2 + 3 = 1 + 4 ° and if we look attentively, this number of 5 ° does not have further solvability in integers in the direction directed to zero. b): we continue to solve the problem in this way, Sorry, forgot to add that this is all presumably an outcry. but we continue to destroy it, and take this way-in the direction directed to the 'decisive point' and this to ' '0' to zero. and we accomplished 4 or 4 add actions. And we take, I mention: We take these very 4 actions and redirect them to the side, toward the deduction actions, and so that we get. the number is 5 °, and what we get in this way. But look, what was the result of the equation: from 9-4 = 8-3 = 7-2 = 6-1 = ° 5 ° = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 = 2 + 3 = 1 + 4 ° and it turns out and there is a digital signature. And I want to very sorry for the earlier, for everything I wrote here. since, indeed, this is all and all for a long time already it is known, so has left. but if to go - c): then, so - the thresholds of solvability in the direction to zero have repeating cycles, two of them which can be cut off, that is, in the retrograde structure we do the same and get:

short, 7-2 = 6-1 = ° 5 ° = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 ° a, which is further, we have 4 (four categories of solvability) of one number of 5 ° and I call it the digital signature of the number. and every number, there is such a signature, by my assumptions, p / s: I solved some equations and the data surprised me, I apologize for bringing references to the article of famous mathematicians. but I had to point it out. Here is one of the examples which has full correspondence in this my assumption:  number: ° 18 ° and its digital signature = 9 °  number: ° 32 ° and its digital signature = ° 16 °  number: ° 4 ° and its digital signature = ° 2 °  number: ° 17 ° and its digital signature = ° 8 ° and the equation in this way: I leave the cathrack if possible

  ° 18 + 32: 4-17 ° ~ and everything from under the root, then = ° 3 ° and the solution from the sequences of these numbers, also equal - 3 ° p \ s: and I ask, who knows about this, please write if it does not complicate, well, so as not to think. Thank you.

Valkov Dmitriy Vladimirivich, Cherepovets, 04.10.1978. Nean (talk) 21:35, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Help me-help == Mathematics in Reflection ==

question

I will ask not much about mathematics. And I'll start perhaps with that, but it is precisely the unsolved problem of the millennium about problem class' P versus NP problem'. and if short, and maybe just shorter, though not much, but probably worth give something to your attention and notice this given column I have drawn. for that I will be very grateful to you and I'm grateful. Thank you. As for the verification of the correctness of the solution of the equation pertaining to paragraph 'P versus NP problem', then please,  suppose now in this way: .. 1-: imagine that every number has some kind of its own definite figure and also for of every number. 2-: let it be, and how to call it? _ Well, for example, perhaps a digital name, Or maybe a digital sequence or a given number, an  or his own digital matriatic reality. who will be more convenient. m, -3-: as is known the figure '0 'is zero, this is the only figure in its image that does not change, the figure is not solvability, existing either as an addition to a certain number. in order to increase it, either it exists only in the most digital manifold of equations, ziffr itself as a given, when solving such problems where it is the only number. The figure 0 ° does not change the fundamental function of the equation. in certain categories. izv. Well, if you take, then b 4e -: and again, imagine that every number has a so-called own  digital podpist. And I imagine it like this: a): take, for example, the figure of 5 °. and we solve here such problem - ° 5 = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 = 2 + 3 = 1 + 4 ° and if we look attentively, this number of 5 ° does not have further solvability in integers in the direction directed to zero. b): we continue to solve the problem in this way, Sorry, forgot to add that this is all presumably an outcry. but we continue to destroy it, and take this way-in the direction directed to the 'decisive point' and this to ' '0' to zero. and we accomplished 4 or 4 add actions. And we take, I mention: We take these very 4 actions and redirect them to the side, toward the deduction actions, and so that we get. the number is 5 °, and what we get in this way. But look, what was the result of the equation: from 9-4 = 8-3 = 7-2 = 6-1 = ° 5 ° = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 = 2 + 3 = 1 + 4 ° and it turns out and there is a digital signature. And I want to very sorry for the earlier, for everything I wrote here. since, indeed, this is all and all for a long time already it is known, so has left. but if to go - c): then, so - the thresholds of solvability in the direction to zero have repeating cycles, two of them which can be cut off, that is, in the retrograde structure we do the same and get:

short, 7-2 = 6-1 = ° 5 ° = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 ° a, which is further, we have 4 (four categories of solvability) of one number of 5 ° and I call it the digital signature of the number. and every number, there is such a signature, by my assumptions, p / s: I solved some equations and the data surprised me, I apologize for bringing references to the article of famous mathematicians. but I had to point it out. Here is one of the examples which has full correspondence in this my assumption:  number: ° 18 ° and its digital signature = 9 °  number: ° 32 ° and its digital signature = ° 16 °  number: ° 4 ° and its digital signature = ° 2 °  number: ° 17 ° and its digital signature = ° 8 ° and the equation in this way: I leave the cathrack if possible

  ° 18 + 32: 4-17 ° ~ and everything from under the root, then = ° 3 ° and the solution from the sequences of these numbers, also equal - 3 ° p \ s: and I ask, who knows about this, please write if it does not complicate, well, so as not to think. Thank you. Valkov Dmitriy Vladimirovich, Cherepovets, 04.10.1978. Nean (talk) 21:44, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Like street Stop using the help me template inappropriately. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 02:12, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
{{User talk:Like street}} / Lua error in Module:Template_link_general at line 132: attempt to concatenate local 'titlePart' (a nil value).

Nean (talk) 08:36, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Like_street&oldid=850982820"