Jump to content

Talk:Muhammad al-Jawad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SSTbot (talk | contribs) at 09:10, 16 September 2018 (→‎top: Added {{vital article}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Muhammad al-Jawad or Muhammad al-Taqi

Ok I am a Shii Muslim and I think that it is most common if not the only way to refer to this Imam is Al-Jawad and not Al-Taki Brokenlove 19:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both are titles, al-Jawad does seem more common, but not exclusive. --Enzuru 06:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Both are tiltes of Imam; in India(at least in Northern India, where I belong to) Imam is usually referred to as Mohammad-Taqi a.s..--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe among Arabs and possibly Iranians, al-Jawad is the more common title. Sometimes it seems the titles get split among ethnic groups for whatever reason. I originally chose al-Taqi because it was shorter to fit into the template. --Enzuru 06:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One more apparent reason for use of At-Taqi is that it is phonetically similar to An-Naqi.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In Dua'a E Tawassul Imam is reffered by both titles, with Taqi first & then Jawad
Ya Aba Ja'farin Ya Mohammadabna ' Ali-yyin Ayyohat-Taqi-yool Javado Yabna Rasoolil-lahe
source Dua'a E Tawassul
--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 05:52, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ninth Imam

Imam Muhammad Al-Taqi, Al-Jawwad is the ninth Shia Imam, not fifth. I changed it..., —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.23.46 (talk) 00:29, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kadhm mosque.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Kadhm mosque.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Media without a source as of 26 June 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the article and correcting the wrong information

Hi @Edward321. In the page occurred some edits which could enhance the quality of the page and clarify the life of this person. Please describe your reason about your reverting. In addition, Al-Ma'mun was the seventh Abbasid caliph who is named in the page, I don't know why you have reverted this name to a wrong name (Al-Ma'mum). If you check all historical references, you will find out "Al-Ma'mum" is completely incorrect which you insist on protecting. Mahda133 (talk) 08:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeppiz. Will the sentence be okay, If it starts with "Ma'mun had asked al-Jawad to marry his daughter...."? Mahda133 (talk) 13:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Muhammad al-Jawad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]