User talk:Mvcg66b3r
WCBD-DT2
The subchannel began broadcasting in 720p in 2013, not 2017. 2605:A601:7018:DC00:6076:A694:EC29:8602 (talk) 17:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Is There Some Reason...
why you do not add edit summaries to your copy edits?
"It is considered good practice to provide a summary for every edit, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors or deleting existing text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit. Edits that do not have an edit summary are more likely to be reverted, because it may not be obvious what the purpose of the edit was." WP:MOS
Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
WMGM-TV Request For Indefinite semi-protection
Mvcg55b3r, Thank you... I was actually in the process of posting the same request and after I clicked "Show Preview" I scrolled down to find that there were two request yours and mine so I deleted my request. I seem to recall that I previously requested Semi-Protection for the WMGM-TV article earlier this year and it wasn't suppose to expire until next year, at least that's what I thought. Anyway thanks for making the request because this is just getting ridiculous with the anonymous IP users. YborCityJohn (talk) 15:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
WPXT-DT3 Is Now An Affiliate Of Escape, WPXT-DT2 Is H&I, And No More MNTV In Portland, Maine (According To RabbitEars.info)
The MyNetworkTV affiliation on the WPXT-DT3 subchannel appears to have been replaced with Escape, with the H&I affiliation moving to the WPXT-DT2 subchannel (according to RabbitEars.info)…RabbitEars.info States CW-51.1, H&I-51.2, Escape-51.3… (source) Furthermore: neither the WPXT website or the WMTW website offer any mentioning whatsoever of any existing MyNetworkTV-affiliated subchannel (or even the network at all, for that matter). DizzyMosquitoRadio99 (talk) 01:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brenda Blackmon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
Why I added 9.3 and 9.4 on KWTV-DT
I live on Oklahoma City and Channel 9 told people to rescan their TVs. When I rescanned, there was a 9.3 and 9.4 that said: Due to FCC constraints, KWTV 9.1 and 9.2 programming will begin November 19th on this channel on both channels. I decided to do the edits because of what I saw on the channels.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WIAT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madam Secretary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
WMGM-TV new request for semi protection
Just FYI, I made another semi-protection request for the WMGM-TV article, whether they will accept it or not I don't know but I am hoping that if they look at the logs they will see what's happening and agree to change the settings. YborCityJohn (talk) 04:33, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Mvcg66b3r. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
WNET
Your edits contain too many overlinks ie: New Jersey is not needed after Newark, New Jersey. Please familiarize yourself with the following information on when to link: MOS:OVERLINKBlueboyLI (talk) 06:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
You have consistently reverted my edits without bothering to discuss on the talk page and have the audacity to say I started an edit war. Again: Your edits contain too many overlinks ie: New Jersey is not needed after Newark, New Jersey. Please familiarize yourself with the following information on when to link: MOS:OVERLINK As for leaving out the "class a's" that information is already in the info-box. The lede is meant to be brief, not filled with information that's already linked. BlueboyLI (talk) 07:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
PS I went over this very same topic with you a year ago, and you seem to have learned nothing in the year since.
Why do you keep reverting my edits? They're more in depth. And why do you add stuff only to remove it later? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Your edits contain too many overlinks ie: Connecticut is not needed after Hartford, Connecticut. Please familiarize yourself with the following information on when to link [1]BlueboyLI (talk) 20:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
As I said, my edits are more in-depth. Yours are kind of bland. And please don't lecture me with that "overlinking" stuff. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Sometimes less is more, esp. when editing lead articles. Your edits lead to reader fatigue with unnecessary redundant links. Other edits are incorrect ie: placing full power stations in the translator field or confusing programming services with networks. BlueboyLI (talk) 02:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
BlueboyLI (talk) 07:39, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurt Kaiser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Intrastate templates
Stop adding stations into the templates that clearly aren't in a state. You have no consensus for the 'licensed to and serving' line and I'm asking you to seek consensus for this change on WP:TVS before going any further. It just adds visual noise and needless templates into the articles for the sake of templates. Nate • (chatter) 07:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- You can change them back if you want to, I just won't mess with them anymore. Thanks. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
WPSU-TV
 | Hello, Mvcg66b3r. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for WPSU-TV at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 23:42, 3 December 2018 (UTC) |
- Hi Mvcg66b3r; I've just started going through this article, however it seems you're still editing it and your edits are conflicting with mine. Please let me know when you've finished making changes so I can continue without interruption. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 02:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
I'm done with that article for tonight; finish your copy edit and I'll look through it later. Thanks. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you; I'm also done for tonight but will be back tomorrow, though I'm not sure what time It'll be. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 03:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Criação, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RTP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
A feature film being made in the WQED studio is not viewed as relevant? This will likely be made into an entire section on the WQED (TV) page when the movie is released. Please explain.
- Just wait until the film is released. Either way, it shouldn't belong in the lead section. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:35, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Seeing as you don't live locally, you shouldn't have reverted anything. CBS 7 announced 3 weeks ago that KTLE Telemundo 20 would be joining the Grey family stations in January. They also announced that all the news anchors from KTLE would be kept the same and that Channel 20 would become available on the KOSA subchannels. Please note they specifically said KTLE Telemundo 20.
Then today they released this chart on their website. As you can see they announce the addition of 3 stations (Ion, CW, and Telemundo) including Telemundo on 2 different feeds with a HD and SD feed. It also announces they will still have MyNetwork and H&I. It's nothing that's speculative. It is what has been announced by the station live on television. Bigddan11 (talk) 02:44, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- As I have said on your talk page, there's no way seven subchannels (three of them HD) could fit onto KOSA's bandwidth. 7.5–7.7 are most likely KTLE, which is its own station with its own transmitter. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Actually you have no knowledge of what is going on here. KTLE hasn't been it's own station in quite some time. It hasn't had it's own tower since it merged with KWES back in 2014. That's why KWES aired KTLE (Telemundo 20) on 9.2. They are the only station that still has a SD channel available, which is why they are going to have both a SD and HD channel available on Channel 7. It'll be the first time they actually have a HD Channel here in the Permian Basin. What has happened is Grey Media acquired Raycom Media Alabama, and with it they acquired all the NewsWest 9 stations. As has been outlined they are selling NewsWest 9 and keeping it separate, but they kept all the other assets, including translator KWAB. What they have done over the past 3 months is set up a second set of antennas on their towers that has actually increased their digital output from 4 stations to 9 stations on KOSA, so they have the room you claim they don't. They have kept their digital output for Big Spring the same, at 4 stations, and they are going to use the newly acquired KWAB signal for the other three stations in Big Spring. However they have made it where are 7 stations will be able to air on Channel 7 in Odessa/Midland.Bigddan11 (talk) 03:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- But KTLE has its own license. It's an analog LPTV, but it will be flash-cut to digital. That LPTV will be home to 7.5, 7.6 and 7.7. Full-power KOSA will have 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4. They'll be using the same virtual channel, but on different RF channels (just like KMSP/WFTC and KSTP/KSTC in Minneapolis). Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- No, you're mistaken. I actually just did a channel rescan. Guess what, we also have a 7-8 available. 7-8 is airing KOSA (SD). So they are available as CBS 7 outlined on the very stations they outlined.Bigddan11 (talk) 03:41, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- This 7.8 must be coming from KTLE, just like 7.5-7.7. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:46, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- No, you're mistaken. I actually just did a channel rescan. Guess what, we also have a 7-8 available. 7-8 is airing KOSA (SD). So they are available as CBS 7 outlined on the very stations they outlined.Bigddan11 (talk) 03:41, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- But KTLE has its own license. It's an analog LPTV, but it will be flash-cut to digital. That LPTV will be home to 7.5, 7.6 and 7.7. Full-power KOSA will have 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4. They'll be using the same virtual channel, but on different RF channels (just like KMSP/WFTC and KSTP/KSTC in Minneapolis). Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
added comment
Didn't Change the Date
- Thanks for the credit, I guess, but I only made an unimportant change to one word and didn't change any dates. Good eyes though. bobdog54 (talk) 01:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image File:New KPBS logo 2019.svg
Thanks for uploading File:New KPBS logo 2019.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
January 2019
Received your inquiry of the correct information necessary to the page WBXX-TV. The system by which Wikipedia requires sources is much too complicated for non-Wikipedia academia. I am not a student of that confusing process. Why do additions for source verification information have to be so difficult to post for articles as proof?
That being said, I have a page attachment from Television and Cable Factbook, Volume 74, ISBN: 1-57696-058-7 published yearly by Warren Communications for calendar year 2006. The television page listing for Crossville, in the state of Tennessee under WBXX-TV, clearly lists a history for the station, that verifies the information change that needed to be made for WBXX-TV. Again, because of the complicated method of adding source information to a Wikipedia page, I did not know how to add it. If you need me to email the attachment to you, I can do that. The attachment supports proof of the change necessary for WBXX-TV. The previous information listing for that television station is wrong without the corrections. I await the method of either sending the attachment for station WBXX-TV to you, or somehow wading through the confusing, complicated, and somewhat ridiculous way of attaching the reference point for WBXX-TV's history.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CECE:C50:55F5:98EB:BDB7:C33F (talk) 16:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you
For reminding me why I left Wikipedia! under my original user name, over in 2004. I am in the process of deleting other contributions I have made. There is a certain insanity in trying to make articles more user friendly with the like of you about to sktrike it out without courtesy of discussion. I will leave Wikipedia, far smarter. WWYFW, eh? Sjkoblentz (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)