Jump to content

Talk:ECHELON

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2001:8003:ac60:1400:cd43:d6f9:c250:6512 (talk) at 02:42, 30 May 2019 (→‎Echelon locations: are well known). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Findsourcesnotice

Former good articleECHELON was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 4, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
February 14, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Delisted good article

Request that this article be write protected?

Given the tendency of conspiracy theorists and over-enthusiastic amateur political analysts to resort to less than academic methods, shouldn't this article be at least a little protected from anonymous editing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.215.92 (talk) 02:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Echelon locations

Most of the locations listed as candidate Echelon stations are picked at random from the nearest conspiracy theory site, and they've almost all been unsourced for 9 months or so. Plenty of time for some evidence to gestate. Several of the sites listed were Iron Horse sites, which wasn't even intercept, but direction finding, and some were old WWII Y-sites. There are very few ground stations which can be reliably attributed to either Bamford or Campbell, probably the only credible sources.

With that in mind I'm going to trim it down to the first section only, most of the third section only contain hangers for the black helicopters anyway. Even the first section is OTT as a couple of the sites listed certainly aren't related, but that's not verifiable.

ALR 14:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't think it is a good idea to be discussion potential/possible ECHELON locations on here at all. (Yes, I know the above comment is from 2007 -- I still don't think it's a good idea to have this info here.) WarFighter (talk) 17:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't we all know where they are? Pine Gap in Australia is well known where it is, it is well guarded, it is also known that we never get told what it costs us, never get a referendum if we still want it. I have been rather perplexed to read that echelon is tasked with industrial espionage although we heavily criticise China for doing just that. There are locations in neighbourhoods where you wonder about things which only make sense if they are an eavesdropping facility. Looking around is all you need to do. I wanted to have a look here whether the current war on Huawei could be due to them not having a backdoor for echelon. But there is no hint here. 2001:8003:AC60:1400:CD43:D6F9:C250:6512 (talk) 02:42, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not but that would be editor ALR's problem. And it's not exactly like Wikipedia is written in secret code. Most likely the NSA and ECHELON can deal with anything put in its article. --Wlmg (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regards to NSA (and ATT) this is a very long and very interesting article. It explains locations and operating details. The information may not fit anywhere (I don't know, it is above my pay grade) but it is awesomely interesting to read. Good thing that we are the good guys. We have awesome technology. Read this and report back on what you think:

https://theintercept.com/2018/06/25/att-internet-nsa-spy-hubs/
It has pictures of main buildings in eight USA largest cities. -- AstroU (talk) 03:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Not sure why there is an NSA infobox in place for an international programme. Having a box for a single nation is monumentally misleading here. - SchroCat (talk) 21:47, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I agree, so I removed it. --Jeff Ogden (W163) (talk) 23:00, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jam Echelon Day

Seriously, no mention of this? 14.202.186.241 (talk) 01:00, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on ECHELON. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ECHELON. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:ECHELON&oldid=899443507"