Jump to content

User talk:Dtwinlauser

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dtwinlauser (talk | contribs) at 18:40, 24 September 2019 (New Message (simulated automatically as part of The Wikipedia Adventure)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Teahouse answer

I have answered your question at the Teahouse. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 01:56, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Dtwinlauser! You created a thread called New user question re steps to create article with COI disclosure at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Dtwinlauser! You created a thread called How do I to change the title of my draft? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Dtwinlauser, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Wikipedia is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that also hosts a range of other projects:

--Gryllida (talk) 22:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dtwinlauser I have added projects South Korea, United States, Actors, Biographies, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 22:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: artist) (December 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please see WP:CREATIVE and WP:PROMO.
K.e.coffman (talk) 03:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dtwinlauser. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "artist)".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 08:22, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Dtwinlauser. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara 09:14, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Athaenara 09:14, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Dtwinlauser (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No undisclosed COI exists; No SPAM produced

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=No undisclosed COI exists; No SPAM produced |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=No undisclosed COI exists; No SPAM produced |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=No undisclosed COI exists; No SPAM produced |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I believe there has been a misunderstanding, perhaps entirely on my part, but I would like to explain none-the-less.

I had noticed that other lead characters in two projects that Joseph Lee was credited in, had their own WIKI pages. When I created my WIKI account I understood the WIKI policy of COI and therefore I did disclose that I am a talent manager and the subject of my first attempt at an article was a client.

I wrote the WIKI article to simply report what Joseph had performed in as an actor and accomplished as a painter/fine artist. I never mentioned our company name or Joseph's representatives; I never linked to any company or representative websites. My assumption was that as long as I could provide accurate source footnotes without commentary or opinion, the article would be considered. And in December it was considered, but the editor had determined that the “subject was not sufficiently notable for inclusion.” I was disappointed, but understood. And I also understood that unless I had anything significant to add, the article would be remove in six months.

Today I signed on to start taking some of the WIKI tutorials so that I could investigate how to contribute on subjects that are of interest to me, only to see that in June an editor tagged the article to be removed as "spam" and then had my account "blocked indefinitely."

I am asking for the block of my account to be reconsidered. I thought I had followed the COI rules when creating my account and creating the first and only article I submitted. I accepted that the article was rejected and that I should learn more before jumping into another subject. But I do not understand why, having been rejected in December, the article was tagged as "spam" in June and how this was cause to block my account.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully Dtwinlauser (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

==

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Dtwinlauser (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No Advertising or Promotion Intent; No Spam produced

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=No Advertising or Promotion Intent; No Spam produced |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=No Advertising or Promotion Intent; No Spam produced |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=No Advertising or Promotion Intent; No Spam produced |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

==

I believe there has been a misunderstanding, perhaps entirely on my part, but I would like to explain none-the-less.

I had noticed that other lead characters in two projects that Joseph Lee was credited in, had their own WIKI pages. When I created my WIKI account I understood the WIKI policy of COI and therefore I did disclose that I am a talent manager and the subject of my first attempt at an article was a client.

I wrote the WIKI article to simply report what Joseph had performed in as an actor and accomplished as a painter/fine artist. I never mentioned our company or any of Joseph's representatives; I did not include links to any company or representative websites. My assumption was that as long as I could provide accurate source footnotes without commentary or opinion, the article would be considered. And in December it was considered, but the editor had determined that the “subject was not sufficiently notable for inclusion.” I was disappointed, but understood. And I also understood that unless I had anything significant to add, the article would be remove in six months. Which is why I do not understand how the article was tagged as "spam" six months later in June and how this was cause to block my account.

Today I signed on to see if there was a response to my previous unblock request with explanation (from September 3) and again take some of the WIKI tutorials so that I could make contributions to other topics in the future. Since there has been no response to that request, I am again asking for the block of my account to be reconsidered.

I do apologize but I thought I had followed the COI rules when creating my account and creating the first and only article I submitted. I accepted that the article was rejected and that I should learn more about WIKI article creation and editing before jumping into any other subject. I do hope I will be given that opportunity.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully Dtwinlauser (talk) 18:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Dtwinlauser! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:40, Tuesday, September 24, 2019 (UTC)