Jump to content

Battle of Khe Sanh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wandalstouring (talk | contribs) at 20:46, 12 December 2006 (some rewording). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Battle of Khe Sanh
Part of the Vietnam Conflict
File:KS1.jpg
PAVN artillery impacts near the airstrip
Date21 January 1968 - 8 April 1968
Location
Khe Sanh, Quang Tri Province, Republic of Vietnam
Result American tactical victory
Belligerents
United States,
Republic of Vietnam
Democratic Republic of Vietnam
Commanders and leaders
David E. Lownds (local),
William C. Westmoreland (theater)
Unknown (local),
Vo Nguyen Giap (theater)
Strength
6,000 ~30,000
Casualties and losses
730 killed in action,
2,642 wounded,
7 missing[1]
Unknown, estimated at 9,000+

The Battle of Khe Sanh was conducted in northwestern Quang Tri Province, Republic of Vietnam, between 21 January and 8 April 1968 concurrently with the Tet Offensive during the Vietnam Conflict. The combatants were elements of the United States (U.S.) III Marine Amphibious Force (III MAF) and two to three division-size elements of the People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN). The American command in South Vietnam gave the defense of the base the nickname Operation Scotland.

The American command in Saigon initially believed that combat operations around Khe Sanh during the summer of 1967 were just part of a series of minor North Vietnamese offensives in the border regions. That appraisal was altered when it was discovered that PAVN was moving major forces into the area during the fall and winter. A build-up of Marine forces took place and actions around Khe Sanh commenced when the Marine base was isolated. During a series of desperate actions that lasted 77 days Khe Sanh Combat Base (KSCB) and the hilltop outposts around it were under constant North Vietnamese ground and artillery attacks.

During the battle a massive aerial bombardment campaign (Operation Niagara)was launched by the U.S. Air Force to support the Marine base. This campaign utilized the latest technological advances in order to locate PAVN forces for targeting. The logistical effort to support KSCB, once it was isolated overland, demanded the implementation of other tactical innovations in order to keep the Marines supplied.

In March 1968, an overland relief expedition (Operation Pegasus) was launched by a combined Marine/Army/South Vietnamese task force that eventually broke through to the Marines at Khe Sanh. The battle itself was as a tactical victory for the Marines, but the strategic implications of the battle remain unclear.

Preliminaries

The Camp

Walt W. Rostow showing President Lyndon B. Johnson a model of the Khe Sanh area, 15 February 1968

The village of Khe Sanh was the seat of government of Huong Hoa District, an area of Bru Montagnard villages and coffee plantations, situated about seven miles from the Laotian frontier on Route 9, the northernmost transverse road in South Vietnam. The badly deteriorated Route 9 ran from the coastal region, through the western highlands, and then crossed the border into Laos. The origin of the combat base lay in the construction by American special forces of an airfield in August 1962 outside the village at an old French fort.[2] The camp then became a special forces outpost of the Civilian Irregular Defense Groups (CIDG), whose purpose was to keep watch on communist infiltration along the border and to protect the local population.[3] In November, 1964 the Green Berets moved their camp to the Xom Cham Plateau, the future site of KSCB.

Map of northern Quang Tri Province

During the winter, Khe Sanh became the location of a launch site for the highly-classified Military Assistance Command, Vietnam Studies and Observations Group or SOG (the site was first established near the village and was later moved to the French fort).[4] From there, recon teams were launched into Laos to explore and gather intelligence on the PAVN logistical system known as the Ho Chi Minh Trail. The plateau camp was permanently manned by the U.S. Marines during 1967, when they established an outpost next to the airstrip. This base was to serve as the western anchor of Marine Corps forces, which had tactical responsibility for the five northernmost provinces of South Vietnam (I Corps).[5] The Marines' defensive system stretched below the Demilitarzed Zone (DMZ) from the coast, along Route 9, to Khe Sanh. In 1966, the regular Special Forces troops had moved off the plateau and built a smaller camp down Route 9 at Lang Vei, about half the distance to the border.[6]

Border Battles

During the second half of 1967, the North Vietnamese instigated a series of actions in the border regions of South Vietnam. All of these attacks were conducted by regimental-size PAVN units, but unlike the usual hit-and-run tactics these battles were sustained and bloody affairs.

In early September, PAVN intensified battalion-size ground probes and sustained artillery fire against Con Thien, a hilltop stronghold in the center of the Marine's defensive line south of the DMZ in northern Quang Tri province.[7] Mortar rounds, artillery shells, and 122mm rockets fell randomly but incessantly upon the base. The September bombardments ranged from 100 to 150 rounds per day, with a maximum on 25 September of 1,190.[8] The American commander in Vietnam, General William C. Westmoreland responded by launching Operation Neutralize, an aerial and naval bombardment campaign designed to break the siege. For seven weeks, American aircraft delivered from 35,000 to 40,000 tons of bombs in nearly 4,000 airstrikes.[9] Bombardement by the PAVN paused.

Combat on Hill 875, the most intense of the battles around Dak To

On 27 October, a PAVN regiment attacked an Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) battalion at Song Be, capital of Phuoc Long Province.[10] The North Vietnamese fought for several days, took casualties, and fell back. Two days later, the 273rd NLF Regiment attacked a special forces camp near the border town of Loc Ninh, in Binh Long province.[11] Troops of the U.S. 1st Infantry Division were able to respond quickly. According to US sources the NLF suffered much higher casualties during the ten-day battle. At least 852 enemy soldiers were killed during the action, as opposed to 50 American and South Vietnamese dead.[12]

The heaviest action took place near Dak To, in the central highlands province of Kontum.[13] There, the presence of the 1st PAVN Division prompted a 22-day battle that saw some of the most intense close-quarters fighting of the entire conflict.[14] Somewhere between 1,200 and 1,600 North Vietnamese troops were killed while 362 members of the U.S. 4th Infantry Division, the 173rd Airborne Brigade, and ARVN airborne elements were killed in action. Ominously, three of the four battalions of the 4th Infantry and the entire 173rd were rendered combat ineffective during the battle.[15]

American intelligence analysts were quite baffled by this series of enemy actions. There appeared to be no logic behind the sustained PAVN/NLF offensives, other than to inflict casualties on the allied forces. This they accomplished, but the casualties absorbed by the communists seemed to negate any gains they might have obtained. The border battles did, however, have two significant consequences that were unappreciated at the time - they fixed the attention of the Americna command on the border regions and they drew American and ARVN forces away from the coastal lowlands and cities.[16]

The Hill Fights

The Khe Sanh Valley

Things remained quiet in the Khe Sanh area through 1966. Even so, General Westmoreland insisted that it not only be occupied by the Marines, but that it be reinforced.[17] He was vociferously opposed by General Lewis W. Walt, the Marine commander of I Corps. Walt argued heatedly that the real target of the American effort should be the pacification and protection of the population, not chasing PAVN and the NLF in the hinterlands.[18] Westmoreland won out, however, and the 1st Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment (1/3) was dispatched to occupy the camp and airstrip on 29 September. By late January 1967, 1/3 was relieved by Bravo Company, 1st Battalion, 9th Marines. A single company was replacing an entire battalion. One of the mysteries of the Battle of Khe Sanh (and one which was never addressed by Westmoreland) was why, after running roughshod over the Marines over the defense of the base, he allowed the drawdown.[19]

On 24 April 1967, a patrol from Bravo Company became engaged with a PAVN force of unknown size north of Hill 861. This action prematurely triggered a North Vietnamese offensive aimed at taking Khe Sanh. The PAVN forces were in the process of gaining elevated terrain before the launching of the main offensive.[20] The 2nd and 3rd Battalions of the 9th Marine Regiment, under the command of Colonel John P. Lanigan, reinforced KSCB and were given the task of pushing the North Vietnamese off of Hills 861, 881 North and 881 South. North Vietnamese forces were driven out of the area around Khe Sanh after suffering 940 casualties. The Marines suffered 155 killed in action and 425 wounded.[21] In order to prevent PAVN observation of the main base at the airfield (and their possible use as firebases), the hills of the surrounding valley had to be continuously occupied and defended by separate Marine elements, thereby spreading out the defense.

The Hill Fights

In the wake of the hill fights there was a lull in PAVN activity around Khe Sanh. By the end of May, Marine forces were again drawn down from two battalions to one, the 1st Battalion 26th Marines. Lieutenant General Robert E. Cushman, Jr. relieved General Walt as commander of III MAF in June. On 14 August, Colonel David E. Lownds took over as commander of the 26th. There were sporadic actions in the vicinity during the late summer and early fall, the most serious of which was the ambush of a supply convoy on Route 9. This proved to be the last overland attempt at resupply until the following March.[22] During December and early January there were numerous sightings of PAVN troops and activities in the Khe Sanh area, but the sector remained relatively quiet.[23]

The Decision

A decision now had to be made by the American command, to either commit more of the limited manpower in I Corps to the defense of Khe Sanh or to abandon the base.[24] For General Westmoreland, the choice was a simple one. In his memoirs he listed the reasons for a continued effort:

"Khe Sanh could serve as a patrol base for blocking enemy infiltration from Laos along Route 9; as a base for SOG operations to harass the enemy in Laos; as an airstrip for reconnaissance planes surveying the Ho Chi Minh Trail; as the western anchor for defenses south of the DMZ; and as an eventual jump-off point for ground operations to cut the Ho Chi Minh Trail."[25]

The Marines, however were not all of the same opinion. General Cushman, the new III MAF commander, perhaps wanting to mend Army/Marine relations after the departure of Walt, supported Westmoreland.[26] Other arguments offered by Marine officers against remaining included: that the real danger to I Corps was from a direct threat to Quang Tri City and other urban areas; that a defense would be pointless as a threat to infiltration, since PAVN troops could easily bypass Khe Sanh; that Khe Sanh was too isolated and that the Marines "had neither the helicopter resources, the troops, nor the logistical bases for such operations...The weather was another critical factor because of the poor visibility and low overcasts attendant to the monsoon season made such operations hazardous to say the least."[27] Brigadier General Lowell English (assistant commander 3rd Marine Division) complained that the defense of the isolated outpost was ludicrous. "When you're at Khe Sanh, you're not really anywhere. You could lose it and you really haven't lost a damn thing."[28]

All Westmoreland needed to know was that PAVN was massing troops for a set-piece battle. Even better, it was in an unpopulated area of South Vietnam where American firepower could be fully brought to bear. It was an opportunity to engage and destroy an elusive enemy that the Americans would not even have to search out, since he was coming to them. It promised to be a victory of unprecedented proportions.[29]

At All Costs

Battle is Joined

Marine intelligence confirmed that, within a period of just over a week, the 325C PAVN Division had moved into the vicinity of the base and two more divisions were within supporting distance. The 324th PAVN Division was located in the DMZ area 10-15 miles north of Khe Sanh while the 320th PAVN Division was within easy reinforcing distance to the northeast.[30] They were supported logistically from the nearby Ho Chi Minh Trail. As a result of this intelligence, KSCB was reinforced on 13 December by the 1st Battalion, 9th Marine Regiment.

At positions west of Hill 881 South and north of Co Roc Ridge, across the border in Laos, PAVN established artillery, rocket, and mortar positions in order to launch attacks by fire on the base and to support their ground operations.[31] They were assisted in their emplacement efforts by the continuing bad weather of the winter monsoon.

Dispositions of opposing forces, January 1968

During the rainy night of 2 January, six men dressed in black pajamas were seen outside the defensive wire of the main base by members of a listening post. After failing to respond to a challenge, they were fired upon and five were killed outright while the sixth, although wounded, escaped.[32] This event prompted General Cushman to reinforce Colonel Lownds with the rest of the 2nd Battalion, 26th Marines. This marked the first time that all three battalions of the 26th Marine Regiment had operated together in combat since the invasion of Iwo Jima during the Second World War,[33] Foxtrot Company, 2/26 was immediately sent out to occupy Hill 558, overlooking the Rao Quan River.

On 20 January, a PAVN lieutenant of the 14th Anti-Aircraft Company, 325C Division defected at the base and laid out the plans for an entire series of North Vietnamese attacks.[34] Hills 881 South, 861, and the main base itself would be simultaneously attacked that evening. At 0030 on 21 January — right on schedule — Hill 861 was attacked by approximately 300 PAVN troops. The Marines, however, were prepared. The North Vietnamese, rocked by artillery fire, still managed to penetrate the perimeter of the defenses and were only driven back after severe close-quarters combat.[35] Hill 881 South, for some reason, was not attacked.

The main base was then subjected to an intense mortar and rocket barrage. Hundreds of mortar rounds and 122mm rockets slammed into the base, leveling most of the above-ground structures. One of the first enemy shells set off an explosion in the main ammunition dump. Many of the artillery and mortar rounds stored in the dump were thrown into the air and detonated on impact within the base. Making a bad situation worse was another enemy hit, this time on a cache of CS tear gas, which saturated the entire base.[36] Hours after the bombardment ceased, the base was still in danger. At around 1000, the fire ignited a large quantity of C-4 and other explosives, rocking the base with another series of detonations. Once again, the North Vietnamese did not launch a ground attack.

File:Nalty.jpg
Images of the battle of Khe Sanh

Simultaneous with the bombardment at KSCB was an attack launched against the Huong Hoa District headquarters. There, elements of the 66th Regiment, 304th PAVN Division were opposed by Bru CIDGs, Regional Force (RF) troops led by their Army advisors, and a platoon of Marine Combined Action Program (CAP). The force held out until the morning of the 22nd, when helicopters were sent in for an extraction. The Marine CAP men and the Army advisors were stunned to learn that "no RFs or Bru with their weapons would be allowed on the helos to return to the Combat Base."[37] An Army captain and his sergeant refused evacuation under such restraints and marched their men to FOB-3 by way of a hidden trail.[38]

The attack revealed that the 304th PAVN Division had just arrived from North Vietnam with all three of its regiments, the 9th, 24th, 66th, the 68B Artillery Regiment, and the 14th Anti-Aircraft Battalion. Attached in support was the 24th Artillery Battalion.[39] The division took up positions southwest of the Combat Base. There has been a significant discrepancy, however as to what infantry units of the 325C Division remained in the Khe Sanh sector. An ARVN document study conducted after the battle concluded that only one regiment, 95C remained at Khe Sanh. According to the study, two other regiments of other divisions held blocking positions on Route 9. They were the 31st Regiment of the PAVN 341st Division and possibly a regiment of the 324th Division.[40] Two battalions of the 3rd Regiment later moved south to Hue to participate in the battle for that city during the latter stages of the Tet Offensive.

To eliminate any threat to their flank, PAVN made the decision to attack Laotian Battalion BV-33, located at Ban Houei Sane, on Route 9 in Laos. The battalion was assaulted on the night of 23-24 January by three PAVN battalions supported by seven tanks. The Laotians were overrun, and many fled to the Special Forces camp at Lang Vei. This action in Laos, not the attack three weeks later at Lang Vei, marked the first time that PAVN had committed an armoured unit to battle.

Due to the arrival of the 304th Division, KSCB was reinforced by the 1st Battalion, 9th Marine Regiment on 22 January. Five days later, the final reinforcements arrived in the form of the 37th ARVN Ranger Battalion, which was deployed more for political than tactical reasons.[41] PAVN artillery made its debut on the battlefield on 24 January, when a bombardment by 100mm and 152mm guns began with Hill 881 South, moved on to Hill 861, and then worked over the main base. The Marines and ARVN dug in and hoped that the approaching Tet truce (scheduled from 29-31 January) would provide some respite. On the afternoon of the 29th, however, the 3rd Marine Division notified Khe Sanh that the truce had been cancelled. The Tet Offensive was about to begin.[42]

Operation Niagara

During January, the recently installed electronic sensors of Operation Muscle Shoals (later renamed Igloo White), which were undergoing test and evaluation in southeastern Laos, were alerted by a flurry of PAVN activity along the Ho Chi Minh Trail opposite the northwestern corner of South Vietnam. It was due to the nature of these activities, and the threat that they posed to KSCB that General Westmoreland ordered Operation Niagara I, an intense intelligence collection effort on PAVN activities in the vicinity of the Khe Sanh Valley.[43]

Niagara I was completed during the third week of January, and the next phase of the operation, Niagara II was launched on the 21st, the day of the first PAVN artillery barrage. The Marine Direct Air Support Center (DASC), located at the Combat Base, was responsible for the coordination of air strikes with artillery fire. An airborne battlefield command and control center (ABCCC), in the form of a C-130 aircraft, directed incoming strike aircraft to forward air control (FAC) spotter planes, which, in turn directed them to targets either located by themselves or radioed in by ground units. When weather conditions precluded FAC-directed strikes, the bombers were directed to their targets by either a Marine AN/TPQ-10 radar installation at KSCB or by Air Force Combat Skyspot MSQ-77 stations. This LORAN-based system could direct aircraft to their targets in inclement weather or in absolute darkness.

B-52 bomber

Thus began what many considered "the most concentrated application of aerial firepower in the history of warfare."[44] On an average day 350 tactical fighter-bombers, 60 B-52s, and 30 light observation or reconnaissance aircraft operated in the skies near the base.[45] Westmoreland had already ordered the nascent Igloo White to assist in the Marine defense.[46] On 20 January, the first sensor drops took place and, by the end of the month, 316 acoustic and seismic sensors had been dropped in 44 strings.[47] The Marines at KSCB credited 40 percent of intelligence available to their fire support coordination center to the sensors.[48]

By the end of the battle of Khe Sanh, U.S. Air Force assets had flown 9,691 tactical sorties and dropped 14,223 tons of bombs on targets within the Khe Sanh area. Marine Corps aviators had flown 7,098 missions and released 17,015 tons. Naval aircrews, many of whom were redirected from Rolling Thunder strikes against North Vietnam, flew 5,337 sorties and dropped 7,941 tons of ordnance on the enemy.[49]

Not even this amount of unleashed firepower was enough to calm the anxiety of American leaders in Washington. On 1 February , General Earle G. Wheeler, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, raised the issue with Westmoreland of "whether tactical nuclear weapons should be used if the situation at Khe Sanh should become that desperate." Westmoreland replied that their use would probably not be required. However, he added that if the situation did change dramatically "I visualize that either tactical nuclear weapons or chemical agents would be active candidates for employment."[50] Westmoreland then established a small study group to examine the consequences of what was nicknamed Fracture Jaw.[51] Westmoreland later wrote that "Washington so feared that some word of it might reach the press that I was told to desist.[52]

PAVN troops move up a hillside near Khe Sanh

While battles were raging around the Combat Base, other engagements were taking place in the headquarters at Hue/Phu Bai, Saigon, and the Pentagon. An intense interservice struggle over who should control aviation assets supporting not just Khe Sanh, but the entire American effort in Southeast Asia was being waged.[53] Westmoreland had given his deputy commander for air operations, Air Force General Willam W. Momyer, the responsibility for coordinating all air assets during the operation to support KSCB. This caused problems for the Marine command, which possessed its own aviation squadrons that operated under their own close air support doctrine. They were extremely reluctant to relinquish authority to an Air Force General.[54]

The command and control arrangement in place in Southeast Asia went against the grain of Air Force doctrine, which was predicated on the single air manager concept. One headquarters would allocate and coordinate all air assets, distributing them wherever they were considered most necessary, and then transferring them as the situation required. The Marines, whose aircraft and doctrine were integral to their operations, were under no such centralized control. On 19 January Westmoreland passed his request for Air Force control up the chain of command to CINCPAC in Honolulu. And there it stayed.

Meanwhile, heated debate arose among Westmoreland, Commandant of the Marine Corps Leonard F. Chapman, Jr. and Army Chief of Staff Harold K. Johnson. Johnson backed the Marine position due to his concern over protecting the Army's air assets from Air Force co-option.[55] Westmoreland went so far as to threaten to resign if his wishes were not obeyed.[56] As a result, on 7 March, for the first time during the Vietnam Conflict, air operations were placed under the control of a single manager. General Westmoreland had won this battle.[57]

The Fall of Lang Vei

The Tet Offensive was launched prematurely in some areas on 30 January. On the following night, a massive wave of PAVN/NLF attacks swept throughout South Vietnam, everywhere that is, except Khe Sanh. The launching of the largest enemy offensive thus far in the conflict did not alter Westmoreland's fixation with Khe Sanh one iota. A press release prepared on January 31 (but never issued), at the height of Tet, showed that he was not about to be distracted. "The enemy is attempting to confuse the issue...I suspect he is also trying to draw everyone's attention away form the greatest area of threat, the northern part of I Corps. Let me caution everyone not to be confused."[58]

There had not been much activity (with the exception of patrolling) thus far during the battle for the green berets of Detachment A-101 and their four companies of Bru CIDGs stationed at Lang Vei. That changed radically during the early morning hours of 7 February. The Americans had previously heard engine noises and spotted the signs of tank treads in the vicinity, but no one expected the North Vietnamese to launch an armoured assault. Although PAVN was known to possess two armoured regiments, it had not yet fielded an armoured unit in South Vietnam, and besides, it would have been impossible for them to get one down to Khe Sanh without it being spotted by aerial reconnaissance.[59]

So, it came as a shock to the Special Forces troopers at Lang Vei when 12 tanks attacked their camp. The Soviet-built PT-76 amphibious tanks of the 202nd Armoured Regiment churned over the defenses, backed up by an infantry assault by the 7th Battalion, 66th Regiment and the 4th Battalion of the 24th Regiment, both elements of the 304th Division. The ground troops were specially equipped for the attack with satchel charges, tear gas, and flame throwers. Although the camp's defenses were overrun in only 13 minutes, the fighting lasted several hours, during which the Special Forces men and Bru CIDGs managed to knock out at least five of the tanks.[60]

Attack on Lang Vei

The Marines at Khe Sanh had a plan in place for providing a ground relief force in just such a contingency, but Colonel Lowndes, fearing a PAVN ambush, refused to implement it. Their was a proposal to launch a helicopter extraction of the survivors, but, once again, Lownds refused.[61] During a meeting at Da Nang at 0700 the next morning, Generals Westmoreland and Cushman accepted Lownds decision. Army Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan Ladd (commander, 5th Special Forces Group), who had just flown in from Khe Sanh, was astounded. The Marines, who prided themselves on leaving no man behind, were willing to write off all of the green berets and simply ignore the fall of Lang Vei.[62]

He and the commander of FOB-3 (whose men and camp had been incorporated into the defenses of KSCB) proposed that, if the Marines would provide the helicopters, the SOG recon men would go in themselves to pick up any survivors.[63] The Marines continued to oppose the operation until Westmoreland actually had to issue an order to Cushman to allow the rescue operation to proceed.[64] It was not until 1500 hours that the relief operation was launched and it was successful. Of the 500 CIDG troops at Lang Vei, 200 had been killed or were missing and 75 more were wounded. Of the 24 Americans at the camp, ten had been killed and 11 wounded.[65]

Colonel Lownds rubbed salt in the wounds of the Special Forces when the indigenous survivors of Lang Vei, their families, civilian refugees from the area, and Laotian survivors from the camp at Ban Houei Sane arrived at the gate of KSCB. Lownds feared that PAVN infiltrators were mixed up in the crowd of more than 6,000.[66] The indigenous soldiers, to the shock of the SOG and CAP personnel, were disarmed and forced to sit, under guard, in bomb craters. Without food or water, many of the Laotians turned around and walked back down Route 9 toward Laos.[67]. The Bru were excluded from evacuation from the highlands by an order from the ARVN I Corps commander, who ruled that no Bru be allowed to move into the lowlands. [68] Colonel Ladd, back on the scene, reported that the Marines said that "they couldn't trust any gooks in their damn camp"[69]

Logistics and Supporting Fire

Colonel Lownds estimated that the logistical requirements of KSCB were 60 tons per day in mid-January and rose to 185 tons per day when all five battalions were in place.[70] The greatest impediments to the delivery of supplies to the base were the closure of Route 9 and the winter monsoon weather. From the beginning of the battle until early March, low-lying clouds and fog enclosed the area from early morning until around noon. Even then, the cloud cover rarely rose above 2,000 feet, closing the airfield to all but the most intrepid aviators.

Super Gaggle: CH-46 Sea Knight helicopters with sling loads (top) and A-4 Skyhawk providing suppressive fire

Making matters worse, any aircraft that did brave the weather and attempted to land was subject to enemy anti-aircraft fire on its way in for a landing. Once the aircraft did touch down, it became the target of any number of PAVN artillery or mortar crews. The aircrew then had to brave the anti-aircraft gauntlet on the way out. USMC KC-130F of VMGR-152, was a typical example of the difficulty in resupplying the firebase. Hit by groundfire during landing at Khe Sahn on 10 February, the fuel bladders aboard were set alight and the airframe burned out on the runway, further obstructing resupply operations. As a result, 65 percent of all supplies were delivered by paradrops delivered by C-130 aircraft.[71] The Air Force claimed that, during the siege, 14,356 tons were delivered to Khe Sanh by air (8,120 tons by paradrop). 1st Marine Aircraft Wing records indicate that the unit delivered 4,661 tons of cargo into KSCB.[72]

The resupply of the numerous, isolated hill outposts was fraught with the same difficulties and dangers. The fire of PAVN anti-aircraft units took its toll of helicopters that made the attempt. The Marines found a solution to the problem in the "Super Gaggle" concept. 12 A-4 Skyhawk fighter-bombers would provide flak suppression for massed flights of 12-16 helicopters, which would resupply the hills simultaneously. The adoption of this concept at the end of February was the turning point in the resupply effort. After its adoption, Marine helicopters flew in 465 tons of supplies during February and, as the weather later cleared in March, this amount was increased to 40 tons per day.[73]

As more infantry units had been assigned to KSCB, artillery reinforcement kept pace. By early January, the defenders of the Khe Sanh could count on fire support from 46 artillery pieces of various calibers, five tanks armed with 90mm guns, and 92 single or Ontos-mounted 106mm recoiless rifles.[74] The base could also depend on fire support from U.S. Army 175mm guns located at Camp Carrol. Throughout the battle, Marine artillerymen fired 158,891 mixed rounds.[75] Marine analysis of PAVN artillery fire disclosed that North Vietnamese gunners had fired 10,908 artillery and mortar rounds and rockets into Marine positions during the battle.[76]

Final Attacks

On the night of the fall of Lang Vei, three companies of the PAVN 101D Regiment, moved into position to attack Alpha-1, an outpost just outside the Combat Base, held by 66 men of the 1/9 Marines. Under cover of a mortar barrage, the North Vietnamese penetrated the perimeter and pushed the remaining 30 defenders into the southwestern portion of the defenses. For some unknown reason, the PAVN troops did not press their advantage and eliminate the pocket.[77] A relief force set out from the main base and attacked through the North Vietnamese, pushing them into supporting artillery fire.

On 23 February, KSCB received its worst bombardment of the battle. During one eight-hour period the base was rocked by 1,307 enemy rounds, most of which came from 130mm (utilized for the first time on the battlefield) and 152mm artillery pieces located in Laos.[78] Casualties from the bombardment were ten killed and 51 wounded. Two days later, the first PAVN trenches appeared, running due north to within 25 meters of the Combat Base perimeter. That same day, a patrol from Bravo Company 1/26 Marines was ambushed by a PAVN force estimated at battalion-size. Casualties during the contact amounted to nine Marines killed, 25 wounded, and 19 missing and presumed dead.[79]

Marine sniper team on Hill 881A spots a target

At the end of February, American intelligence postulated that the 66th Regiment, 304th PAVN Division was in the process of mounting an attack on the positions of the 37th ARVN Ranger Battalion, on the eastern perimeter.[80] On the night of 30 February, the Combat Base unleashed artillery and airstrikes on possible North Vietnamese staging areas and routes of advance. At 2130, the attack came on, but it was stifled by the small arms of the rangers, who were supported by thousands of artillery rounds and air strikes. Two further attacks later in the morning were halted before the North Vietnamese finally withdrew. PAVN, however, was not through with the ARVN troops. Five more attacks against their sector of the defenses were launched during the month of March.

By mid-March, Marine intelligence began to note an exodus of PAVN units from the Khe Sanh sector.[81] The 325C Divisional Headquarters was the first to leave, followed by 95C and 101D Regiments, all of which relocated to the west. At the same time, the 304th PAVN Division withdrew to the southwest. That did not mean, however that battle was over. On 22 March over 1,000 North Vietnamese rounds fell on the base, and, once again, the ammo dump was detonated.[82]

On 30 March, Bravo Company, 1/26 Marines, launched an attack toward the location of the ambush that had claimed so many of their comrades on 25 February. Following a rolling barrage fired by nine artillery batteries, the Marine attack advanced through two PAVN trenchlines, but the Marines failed to locate the remains of the men of the ambushed patrol. The Marines claimed 115 North Vietnamese killed while their own casualties amounted to ten dead, 100 wounded, and two missing.[83] At 0800 on the following day, Operation Scotland was officially terminated. Operational control of the Khe Sanh operational area was handed over to the Army's 1st Air Cavalry Division for the duration of Operation Pegasus.[84]

Cumulative friendly casualties for Operation Scotland, which began on 1 November 1967, were: 205 killed in action, 1,668 wounded, and 25 missing and presumed dead.[85] These figures do not include U.S. aircrews killed or missing in the area or Marine replacements or wounded killed while entering or exiting the base oboard aircraft. As far as North Vietnamese casualties were concerned, 1,602 bodies were counted, seven prisoners were taken, and two enemy rallied to allied forces during the operation. American intelligence postulated that between 10,000 and 15,000 PAVN troops were killed during the operation.[86] These figures, however, should be considered in light of the methods by which they were obtained. The estimates were almost exclusively gathered by indirect means: sensor readings, sightings of secondary explosions, reports of defectors or POWs, and inference or extrapolation.[87]

Relief and Results

Operation Pegasus

Planning for the overland relief of Khe Sanh had begun as early as 25 January when Westmoreland ordered General John J. Tolson, commander of the Army's 1st Air Cavalry Division, to prepare a contingency plan. Route 9, the only practical overland route from the east, was impassable due to its poor state of repair and the presence of PAVN troops. Tolson was not happy with the assignment, since he believed that the best course of action, post-Tet, was to utilize his division in an attack into the A Shau Valley. Westmoreland, however, was already planning ahead. Khe Sanh would be relieved and then utilized as the jump-off point for a "hot pursuit" of enemy forces into Laos.[88]

On 2 March, Tolson presented a briefing and laid out the concept of what became known as Operation Pegasus. The operational plan for what was to become the largest operation launched by III MAF thus far in the conflict, was simple. The 2nd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment and the 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marines Regiment would set out from LZ Stud at Ca Lu (16 kilometers to the east of Khe Sanh) and head down Route 9 while elements of the 1st Air Cavalry leapfrogged by helicopter down the road, air-assaulting onto key terrain features to cover the Marine advance. The advance would be supported by the fire of 102 pieces of artillery.[89] The Marines would be accompanied by their 11th Engineer Battalion, which would repair the road as the advance moved forward. Later, the 1st Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment and 3rd ARVN Airborne Task Force (the 3rd, 6th, and 8th Airborne Battalions) would join the operation.

General Westmoreland's planned relief effort infuriated the Marines, who had not wanted to hold Khe Sanh in the first place and who had been roundly criticized for not defending it well.[90] The Marines had constantly argued that technically, Khe Sanh had never been under siege, since it had never truly been isolated from resupply or reinforcement. General Cushman was appalled by the "implication of a rescue or breaking of the siege by outside forces."[91]

File:Pega1.jpg
Images of Operation Pegasus

Regardless, on 1 April 1969, Operation Pegasus began. Opposition from the North Vietnamese was light and the only problem that hampered the operation was continual heavy morning cloud cover that slowed the pace of helicopter operations. As the relief force advanced, the Marines at Khe Sanh moved out from their positions and began patrolling at greater distances from the base. Things heated up for the air cavalrymen on 6 April, when the 3rd Brigade encounterd a PAVN blocking force and fought a day-long engagement.

On the following day, the 2nd Brigade of the 1st Air Cavalry captured the old French fort near Khe Sanh village after a three-day battle. The link-up between the relief force and the Marines at KSCB took place at 0800 on 8 April, when the 2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry entered the camp.[92] The 11th Engineers proclaimed Route 9 open to traffic on 11 April. On that day, the commander of the 1st Air Cavalry ordered his unit to immediately make ready for operations in the A Shau Valley.[93] At 0800 on 15 April, Operation Pegasus was oficially terminated. American casualties amounted to 92 killed in action, 667 wounded, and five missing. 33 ARVN troops were killed and 187 wounded. Estimates of PAVN casualties were 1,100 killed and 13 captured.[94]

Colonel Lownds and the 26th Marines departed, leaving the defense of the base to the 1st Marine Regiment. General Westmoreland continued to demand that the base be occupied and kept it so until he departed Vietnam on 11 June.[95] His successor, General Creighton W. Abrams allowed the passage of one week before he ordered the initiation of Operation Charlie, the destruction and evacuation of KSCB. That task was completed on 6 July.[96] Colonel Lownds made his final appearance in the story of Khe Sanh on 23 May 1968, when he and his regimental sergeant major stood before President Johnson and were presented with a Presidential Unit Citation on behalf of the 26th Marines.

Once the news of the closure of the KSCB was announced, the American media immediately raised questions about the reasoning behind its abandonment. If Khe Sanh had been so strategically important in January, why was it not so in July? The explanations given out by the Saigon command were that

"the enemy had changed his tactics and reduced his forces; that PAVN had carved out new infiltration routes; that the Marines now had enough troops and helicopters to carry out mobile operations; that a fixed base was no longer necessary."[97]

By this point in the conflict, however, the Marine demand for more mobility was moot. The gradual withdrawal of U.S. forces begun during the following year and the adoption of Vietnamization meant that, by 1969, "although limited tactical offensives abounded, U.S. military participation in the war would soon be relegated to a defensive stance."[98]

Riddle of Khe Sanh

File:General Vo Nguyen Giap.jpg
General Vo Nguyen Giap

Historically, the most important question remaining to be answered about the Vietnam Conflict is what exactly was Hanoi's strategic goal at Khe Sanh? This perplexing problem, known among historians as the "riddle of Khe Sanh" can be best summed up by John Prados and Ray Stubbe: "Either the Tet offensive was a diversion intended to facilitate PAVN/NLF preparations for a war-winning battle at Khe Sanh, or Khe Sanh was a diversion to mesmerize Westmoreland in the days before Tet." [99]

Was PAVN actually planning a genuine attempt to take Khe Sanh? Was the battle truly an attempt to replicate the Viet Minh triumph against the French at Dien Bien Phu? General Westmoreland thought so. That belief was the basis for his desire to stage "Dien Bien Phu in reverse".[100] If Hanoi was willing to mass its troops within a limited geographic area, making it vulnerable to American firepower, then so much the better.

Why else would Hanoi have committed so many forces to the area instead of committing them to the Tet Offensive? The North Vietnamese only committed about half of their available forces to the offensive (60-70,000), the majority of whom were members of the NLF. Could they have been simply a localized defensive measure in the DMZ area? Were they serving as a reserve in case of an offensive American end run a la the American invasion at Inchon during the Korean Conflict?

General Abrams has suggested that the North Vietnamese may indeed have been planning to emulate Dien Bien Phu. He believed that PAVN's actions during Tet proved it.)[101]It would have taken longer to dislodge the communists at Huế if PAVN had committed the three divisions at Khe Sanh to the battle there (although PAVN did commit three regiments to the fighting from the Khe Sanh sector.[102]

Perhaps the North Vietnamese were planning to work both ends against the middle. This strategy has come to be known as the Option Play. If PAVN could take Khe Sanh, all well and good. If they could not, they would occupy the attention of as many American and South Vietnamese forces in I Corps as they could in order to facilitate the Tet Offensive.[103] This view was supported by a captured (in 1969) North Vietnamese study of the battle. According to the study, PAVN would have taken Khe Sanh if they could, but there were limits to the price they were willing to pay. Their main objectives were to kill American troops and to isolate them in the remote border regions.[104]

Or was the action around Khe Sanh (and the other border battles) simply a feint, a ruse meant to focus American attention (and forces) on the borders? General and historian Dave Palmer accepts this rationale: "General Giap never had any intention of capturing Khe Sanh...[it] was a feint, a diversionary effort. And it had accomplished its purpose magnificently."[105]

Commandant of the Marine Corps Wallace Greene (l), III MAF Commander Robert Cushman (c), and General William Westmoreland (r)

He was seconded by Marine General Rathvon M. Tompkins, commander of the 3rd Marine Division, who pointed out the key fact that refuted the idea that PAVN intended to take Khe Sanh: North Vietnamese troops had never bothered to threaten the Combat Base's sole source of water, a stream 500 meters outside the perimeter of the base. Had they contaminated the stream, the airlift would never have been able to provide enough water to the Marines.[106]

One argument leveled by Westmoreland at the time (and often quoted by historians of the battle) was that only two Marine regiments were tied down at Khe Sanh compared with several PAVN divisions.[107] But, at the time Hanoi made the decision to move in around the base, Khe Sanh was held by only two (or even just one) American battalions. Was the destruction of one battalion to be the goal of two to four PAVN divisions? Yet, even if Westmoreland believed his statement, his argument never moved on to the next logical level. By the end of January 1968, he had moved half of all U.S. combat troops - nearly fifty maneuver battalions - to I Corps.[108] All of these arguments have intrigued historians of the battle, but the answer to the "riddle of Khe Sanh" will only be found when the historical archives of Vietnam are opened for research.

Notes

  1. ^ The low figure often cited for U.S. casualties (205 killed in action, 443 wounded, 2 missing) does not take into account U.S. Army or Air Force casualties or those incurred during Operation Pegasus John Prados and Ray W. Stubbe, Valley of Decision. Annapolis MD: Naval Institute Press, 1993, Prados & Stubbe, p. 454.
  2. ^ Jack Schulimson, LtCol. Leonard A Blaisol, Charles R. Smith, and Capt. David A. Dawson, U.S. Marines in Vietnam: 1968. Washington DC: Marine Corps History and Museums Division, 1997, p. 59.
  3. ^ For a succinct overview of the creation of the CIDG program and its operations, see Shelby L. Stanton, Green Berets at War. Novato CA: Presidio Press, 1985, pps. 35-48.
  4. ^ U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, Command History 1965, Annex N. Saigon, 1966, p. 18.
  5. ^ Prados & Stubbe, pps. 140-146. See also Clark Dougan, Stephan Weiss, et al, Nineteen Sixty-Eight. Boston: Boston Publishing Company, 1983, p. 42.
  6. ^ Schulimson, p. 60.
  7. ^ Maj. Gary L. Telfer, LtCol. Lane Rogers, and V. Keith Fleming, U.S. Marines in Vietnam: 1967. Washington DC: U.S. Marine Corps History and Museums Program, 1984, pps. 129-131.
  8. ^ Terrence Maitland, Peter McInerney, et al, A Contagion of War. Boston Publishing Company, p. 164.
  9. ^ Maitland & McInerney, p. 165.
  10. ^ Maitland & McInerney, p. 165.
  11. ^ Maitland & McInerney, p. 165.
  12. ^ Maitland & McInerney, p. 165.
  13. ^ The most detailed account is in Edward F. Murphy, Dak To New York: Pocket Books, 1995.
  14. ^ Shelby L. Stanton, The Rise and Fall of an American Army, New York: Dell, 1985, pps. 160-169.
  15. ^ Maitland & McInerney, p. 183.
  16. ^ Dave R. Palmer, Summons of the Trumpet. New York: Ballantine Books, 1978, pps. 213-215.
  17. ^ Dougan & Weiss, p. 432.
  18. ^ Edward F. Murphy, The Hill Fights. New York: Ballentine Books, 2002, pps. 3-7 & 13-14.
  19. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 71.
  20. ^ Murphy, p. 79.
  21. ^ Captain Moyars S. Shore, The Battle for Khe Sanh. Washington DC: U.S. Marine Corps Historical Branch, 1969, p. 17. For detailed accounts of the Hill Fights, see Telfer, Rogers, & Fleming, Chapter 4 and Murphy, The Hill Fights.
  22. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 155.
  23. ^ Murphy, p. 233.
  24. ^ Only nine U.S. battalions were available from Hue/Phu Bai northward. Prados & Stubbe, p. 159.
  25. ^ William C. Westmoreland, A Soldier Reports New York: Doubleday, p. 236. General Westmoreland had been forwarding operational plans for an invasion of Laos since 1966. First there had been Operation Full Cry (1966), the original three-division invasion plan. This was superseded by the smaller contingency plans Southpaw and High Port (1967). With Operation EL Paso the general returned to a three-divisional plan in 1968. There was another plan (York) which envisioned the use of even larger forces. U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam Command History, 1966, Annex M. Saigon, 1967, p. 60. See also Jacob Van Staaveren, Interdiction in Southern Laos, 1961-1968. Washington DC: Center of Air Force History, 1993, p. 230 & 290.
  26. ^ Schulimson, p. 67.
  27. ^ Shore, p. 47
  28. ^ Dougan & Weiss p. 42.
  29. ^ Dougan & Weiss, p. 42.
  30. ^ Dougan & Weiss, p. 43.
  31. ^ PAVN 152mm artillery pieces had a range of around ten and one-half miles. The 130mm gun, introduced later, had a range of nineteen miles. The heaviest Marine ordnance at Khe Sanh, the 155mm, had a range of only nine miles. This discrepancy in ranges was utilized by the North Vietnamese in order to avoid counter-battery fire.
  32. ^ A whole myth has grown up around this incident. The dead men have been described as wearing Marine uniforms; that they were a regimental commander and his staff on a reconnaissance; that they were all identified, by name, by American intelligence. See Prados & Stubbe, p. 215.
  33. ^ Shore, pps. 30-31.
  34. ^ Schulimson, p. 72.
  35. ^ Schulimson, pps. 258-259.
  36. ^ Dougan & Weiss, p. 44.
  37. ^ Schulimson, p. 264.
  38. ^ Schulimson, p. 264.
  39. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 268.
  40. ^ Prados & Stubbe, pps. 268-269.
  41. ^ Schulimson, p. 269.
  42. ^ For the most concise history of the offensive see Dougan & Weiss. More detailed is Don Oberdorfer, Tet: The Story of a Battle and Its Historic Aftermath. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1971.
  43. ^ Van Staaveren, p. 290.
  44. ^ John Morocco, Thunder from Above. Boston: Boston Publishing Company, 1984, p. 52
  45. ^ Morocco, p. 178.
  46. ^ Van Staaveren, p. 290.
  47. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 301.
  48. ^ Bernard C. Nalty, Air Power and the Fight for Khe Sanh. Washington DC: Office of Air Force History, 1986, p. 95.
  49. ^ Prados and Stubbe, p. 297.
  50. ^ Dougan & Weiss, p. 45.
  51. ^ Schulimson, p. 270.
  52. ^ Westmoreland, p. 252
  53. ^ Schulimson, pps. 487-515.
  54. ^ Prados & Stubbe, pps. 295-297.
  55. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 223.
  56. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 295.
  57. ^ Morocco, p. 178.
  58. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 286. See also Pisor, p. 152.
  59. ^ The method by which PAVN achieved this feat is described in Prados & Stubbe, pps. 319-320.
  60. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 329.
  61. ^ Schulimson, p. 276.
  62. ^ Schulimson, p. 276.
  63. ^ Prados & Stubbe, pps. 332-333.
  64. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 333.
  65. ^ Dougan & Weiss, p. 47.
  66. ^ Shulimson, pps. 276-277.
  67. ^ The Lao troops were eventually flown back to their homeland, but not before the Laotian regional commander remarked that his army had to "consider the South Vietnamese as enemy because of their conduct." Prados & Stubbe, p. 338
  68. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 340.
  69. ^ Schulimson, p. 277. There had never been any love lost between the Special Forces personnel and the Marines. General Rathvon Tompkins, commander of the 3rd Marine Division, described the Special Forces soldiers as "hopped up...wretches...[who] were a law unto themselves." Pisor, p. 76. At the end of January, General Tompkins had ordered that no Marine patrols proceed more than 500 meters from the main base. Schulimson, p. 269. The SOG recon teams however, kept on patrolling, providing the only human intelligence available for KSCB. This, however, did not prevent the Marine tanks within the perimeter from training their guns on FOB-3. Schulimson, p. 277.
  70. ^ Shore, p. 90.
  71. ^ Dougan & Weiss, p. 49. The most dramatic supply delivery system utilized at Khe Sanh was the Low Altitude Parachute Extraction System (LAPES), in which palletized supplies were pulled out of the cargo bay of a low-flying transport aircraft by means of an attached parachute. The pallet slid to a halt on the airstrip while the aircraft never had to actually land.
  72. ^ Shore, p. 79
  73. ^ Shore, p. 89.
  74. ^ Shore, p. 33.
  75. ^ Shore p. 107.
  76. ^ Schulimson, p. 283.
  77. ^ Schulimson, p. 277.
  78. ^ Schulimson, p. 279.
  79. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 405.
  80. ^ Schulimson, p. 281.
  81. ^ Schulimson, p. 281.
  82. ^ Schulimson, p. 282.
  83. ^ Schulimson, pps. 282-283.
  84. ^ Schulimson, p. 283.
  85. ^ Shore, p. 131.
  86. ^ Schulimson, p. 283, and Shore, p. 131.
  87. ^ Dougan & Weiss, p. 55.
  88. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 418 & 420.
  89. ^ Prados & Stubbe, pps. 428, 431, & 437.
  90. ^ Murphy, pps. 239-240. See also Pisor, p. 108.
  91. ^ Murphy, p. 240.
  92. ^ Schulimson, p. 286.
  93. ^ Schulimson, p. 287.
  94. ^ Schulimson, p. 289.
  95. ^ Pisor, pps. 238-232.
  96. ^ Murphy, p. 244.
  97. ^ Dougan & Weiss, p. 54.
  98. ^ Stanton, The Rise and Fall of an American Army, p. 246.
  99. ^ Prados & Stubbe, p. 173.
  100. ^ Pisor, p. 61.
  101. ^ James Warren, The Mystery of Khe Sanh in Robert Cowley, ed. The Cold War: A Military History. New York: Random House, 2005, p. 333.
  102. ^ Dougan & Weiss, p. 38.
  103. ^ Pisor, p. 210.
  104. ^ Shulimson, pps. 67-68.
  105. ^ Palmer, p. 219.
  106. ^ Dougan & Weiss, p. 55.
  107. ^ Pisor, p. 240.
  108. ^ Murphy, p, 235.

Sources

Unpublished Government Documents

  • U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, Command History 1965, Annex N. Saigon, 1966.
  • U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, Command History 1966, Annex M. Saigon, 1967.

Published Government Documents

  • Nalty, Bernard C. Air Power and the Fight for Khe Sanh. Washington, D.C.: Office of Air Force History, 1986. LCC DS557.8.K5 N34 1986
  • Schulimson, Jack, LtCol. Leonard Blasiol, Charles R. Smith, and Capt. David A. Dawson. U.S. Marines in Vietnam: 1968, the Defining Year. Washington, D.C.: History and Museums Division, United States Marine Corps, 1997. ISBN 0-16-049125-8
  • Shore, Capt. Moyars S., III. The Battle for Khe Sanh. Washington, D.C.: Historical Branch, U.S. Marine Corps, 1969. LCC DS557.A62 K58
  • Telfer, Maj. Gary L., LtCol. Lane Rogers, and V. Keith Fleming. U.S. Marines in Vietnam: 1967, Fighting the North Vietnamese. Washington, D.C.: History and Museums Division, United States Marine Corps, 1984. LCC DS558.4 .U55 1977
  • Van Staaveren, Jacob. Interdiction in Southern Laos, 1961-1968. Washington, D.C.: Center of Air Force History, 1993. LCC DS558.8 .V36 1993

Biographies

  • Westmoreland, William C. A Soldier Reports. New York: Doubleday, 1976. LCC DS559.5 .W47

Secondary Sources

  • Dougan, Clark, Stephen Weiss, et al. Nineteen Sixty-Eight. Boston: Boston Publishing Company, 1983.
  • Maitland, Terrence, Peter McInerney, et al. A Contagion of War. Boston: Boston Publishing Company, 1983.
  • Morocco, John. Thunder from Above: Air War, 1941-1968. Boston: Boston Publishing Company, 1984.
  • Murphy, Edward F. The Hill Fights:The First Battle of Khe Sanh. New York: Ballentine Books, 2003.
  • Palmer, Dave Richard. Summons of the Trumpet. New York: Ballentine Books, 1978.
  • Pisor, Robert. The End of the Line: The Siege of Khe Sanh. New York: Ballentine Books, 1982.
  • Prados, John and Ray W. Stubbe. Valley of Decision: The Siege of Khe Sanh. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1991.
  • Stanton, Shelby L. Green Berets at War: U.S. Army Special Forces in Southeast Asia, 1956-1975. Novato, CA: Presidio Press, 1985.
  • Stanton, Shelby L. The Rise and Fall of an American Army: U.S. Ground Forces in Vietnam, 1965-1973. New York: Dell, 1985.
  • Warren, James. The Mystery of Khe Sanh in Robert Cowley, ed. The Cold War: A Military History. New York: Random House, 2005.