Talk:Xwedodah

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Iran C‑class Mid‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

History C‑class Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sociology C‑class Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Religion C‑class Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Persian nationalists seem to be censoring information

It seems someone is blanking the whole article and filling it with unreliable sources that are not verified, where as the new one does cite to historical academic sources Hindoodoo123 (talk) 00:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)<--- blocked sock of User:AntiRacistSwede (see also; [1])[reply]

And it seems someone here cannot get over being banned for sock-puppetry, and repeatedly makes new accounts to push his WP:SYNTH nonsense. Reverting sock-puppeteers is standard practice on Wikipedia, you can make a thousand new accounts if you wish but it won't change anything. -- Qahramani44 (talk) 01:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Having reviewed the recent editing history of this page, I must confess that I'm concerned that the primary motivation for removal of material is essentially IDONTLIKEIT; the sourcing checks out, and much of it is consonant with the generally accepted stance in Indo-Iranian studies. I'm tempted to reinstate portions of the removed material, rewriting some, but am posting here for clarification on what exactly editors feel is the WP:Synth component of previously included material. Hölderlin2019 (talk) 03:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

There is clearly an edit-war about to happen here. Could users please avoid blanking the page and disruptive editing (and using what appears to be sock puppets with offensive usernames in other languages). The version of the article I revert to is the least inflammatory and most in line with academic opinion. I have also seen Edit protection has been requested on this page which is wholly supported by me. Manzarene (talk) 13:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's literally you though. you're going on your phone and turning the hotspot on and off to change your IP. Every single one of those vandalizing edits is from you, this is called subtle vandalism btw, and i cba to bother warning you, regardsLamazeva (talk) 13:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]