Jump to content

User talk:FULBERT

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LBJJames (talk | contribs) at 03:24, 12 October 2020 (→Week4/Add a Citation to One Article/LBJJames: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Week 2 / Evaluation / JS11323

After viewing the all trainning about how to evalute an article, I knew the reason why we should evalute the articles, and everyone could learn from those articles for free. However, I found that not all articles are reliable or correct, the authors of these article in Wiki are just like us, normal people or someone who knows a little bit about this. I felt very fulfilled after doing these steps. Here is the link of my comment of the article I chose: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusion_(education). Here is the evaluation of this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Js11323/Inclusion(education). --Js11323 (talk) 16:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Js11323, Please follow the directions exactly, as you edited the article itself which was quickly reverted with your feedback and also did not complete the article evaluation per the Week 2 instructions. Complete the evaluation per the Wiki Edu dashboard Week 2 instructions and ping me here when done and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the evaluation from the WIKI Edu dashboard Week 2. Here is the link of my comment of the article I chose: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusion_(education). Here is the evaluation of this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Js11323/Evaluate_an_Article--Js11323 (talk) 02:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Js11323, I don't see the article evaluation on the second link you shared. Please review the assignment for what should be there and then reping me. FULBERT (talk) 19:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the link of my evaluation, I don't know why it does not show the real page, but I copy and paste the same link, it works. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Js11323/Evaluate_an_Article --Js11323 (talk) 06:46, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Js11323, Please edit your post to include spaces between the week, assignment, and your user name and the " / " and then reply to me here and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 22:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have done.--Js11323 (talk) 22:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Js11323 Please remember to indent your replies with one colon " : " for each level of indent you want, as this helps with readability. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. --- FULBERT (talk) 00:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT Ok, I think it is good now.--Js11323 (talk) 00:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Js11323, Great! Done. Current. FULBERT (talk) 19:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WEEK1 / INTRIDUCTION / Dyy122dyy

Hi everyone, my name is Yiyou Dong. I graduated from Brandeis University and I'm now in my third semester in NYU. My major is Management and system and concentration is ERM. I am a basketball fan and my favorite team is Lakers. I took internship in Eastern Securities as an assistant to manager. Hope we can have a good time together! Dyy122dyy (talk) 07:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dyy122dyy, Please edit your post to include spaces between the week, assignment, and your user name and the " / " and then reply to me here and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 22:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT, I have put the space in the title

202.66.60.168 (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dyy122dyy Please remember to sign each of your posts using four tilde characters ~~~~ at the end and also to indent with your replies. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. --FULBERT (talk) 22:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT,

Dyy122dyy (talk) 22:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dyy122dyy, Great! Current. FULBERT (talk) 19:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WEEK2 / EVALUATE ARTICLE / Dyy122dyy

1.After completing the training courses, I learn how to evaluate an article. I find the pros and cons of my article. The article is detailed but somehow not updated. Doing such work is easy, but fun. The article I read is "lakers" because I'm a huge basketball fan. 2.The link to the article is : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_Lakers . 3.The evaluation link is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dyy122dyy/Evaluate_an_Article Dyy122dyy (talk) 15:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dyy122dyy, Please edit your post to include spaces between the week, assignment, and your user name and the " / " and then reply to me here and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 22:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT, I have put the space in the title

Dyy122dyy (talk) 22:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dyy122dyy, Nice work overall. Current. FULBERT (talk) 19:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week3 / Copyedit an Article / 燕京赵大知识分子

I removed an extra space after a sentence just for a better reading experience and consistency overall. I removed the extra space before "Moreover, once SMB and HML are defined..." Here is the difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fama%E2%80%93French_three-factor_model&type=revision&diff=980755075&oldid=971266100

I learned that even for fairly mature article, there's always room for improvement regardless of content or format. 燕京赵大知识分子 (talk) 08:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

燕京赵大知识分子, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 23:58, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT, I apologize for assigning the wrong one as this was the previous one I attempted to copyedit. Now the new one should be up. 燕京赵大知识分子 (talk) 15:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
燕京赵大知识分子, Great. Current. FULBERT (talk) 22:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week3 / Copyedited an article /ASCXX

1. Link to the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_Switch

2. Link to diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nintendo_Switch&diff=980839379&oldid=980521200

3. I did not realize Wikipedia contains so many minor errors, it could be a tiny error such as missing a comma. I learned the importance of kept editing and correcting articles on Wikipedia. Every small change adds up to a perfect article. ASCXX (talk) 19:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ASCXX, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ASCXX, OK; current. FULBERT (talk) 22:11, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week3 / Copyedit an Article / 八路军被服厂李厂长

In this week, I kept adding some facts that make the passage read more logically. The summary of the change is link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:%E5%85%AB%E8%B7%AF%E5%86%9B%E8%A2%AB%E6%9C%8D%E5%8E%82%E6%9D%8E%E5%8E%82%E9%95%BF/Liu_Bei/Bibliography?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography

Here is the link shows the difference. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liu_Bei&type=revision&diff=981330337&oldid=980970715

This work is fairly easy from my perspective, this is the second time I edit for this article, and feels great. First time I added a citation, but it was a link toward another wiki, I may want change that afterwards.--八路军被服厂李厂长 (talk) 17:39, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

八路军被服厂李厂长, You did not have to draft your assignment on your user page, so you may want to remove it from there. Otherwise, this is fine. Current. FULBERT (talk) 00:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT, removed already八路军被服厂李厂长 (talk) 01:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
八路军被服厂李厂长, Excellent! FULBERT (talk) 22:13, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 / Add a Citation to One Article / JS11323

I chose an article called "inclusion (education)" for my research paper, and the article citation I added is about the participation of people with disabilities in the workplace across the employment. Here is the link of the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusion_(education). Here is the difference between revisions: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inclusion_%28education%29&type=revision&diff=981385606&oldid=979796888. After doing this lesson, I have learned how to add a citation, and I will update more credible sources in the future. --Js11323 (talk) 00:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Js11323, Nice edit! Current. FULBERT (talk) 22:11, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week3/ Copyedit an article/ Haomimimi

1. Here is the article that I have edited: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=English_Through_Actions# 2. The link to the differences between previous version and the current one is: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/English_Through_Actions 3. I changed the last two sentences to make the meaning easier to understand. During the process, I find that there are some sentences that are reductant and need further polished. Haomimimi (talk) 14:04, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FULBERT This is my Week 3 task.
Haomimimi, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 22:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

week1/introduction/shangyingsun

Hi professor, I'm Shangying Sun. my wikipedia name is shangyingsun. I graduated from Arizona State University with graphic design major. I have internship experience in my senior year in Beijing. Now I'm full-time student in Management system program, concentrate on strategy and leadership. Hope this class will help my future career. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shangyingsun (talk • contribs) 16:07, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shangyingsun Please remember to sign each of your posts using four tilde characters ~~~~ at the end. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. --FULBERT (talk) 22:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for mention me, I have signed the post.Shangyingsun (talk) 18:31, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shangyingsun, OK; Done. FULBERT (talk) 18:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 / Add a Citation to One Article / 八路军被服厂李厂长

The article I used for this article is talking about the biggest Fintech company in China---Ant Group. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ant_Group

The passage didn't mention why it can gather so much wealth from its services. Then I cite in couple sentences and added one peer-reviewed article from my research. Here is the link for the difference. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ant_Group&diff=prev&oldid=981500292

What i learned from this is never to trust on wikipedia...... Sometimes their information aren't specific and not valuable at all..... And they do revert whatever you did :( sad for me. 八路军被服厂李厂长 (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

八路军被服厂李厂长, Your citation was reverted; can you find a better place in the article for this to go? Ping me here when you add it someplace more fitting. FULBERT (talk) 22:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT Done and the following link for the difference.八路军被服厂李厂长 (talk) 16:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
八路军被服厂李厂长, Please remember to indent your replies with one colon " : " for each level of indent you want, as this helps with readability. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 22:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ant_Group&type=revision&diff=982181672&oldid=981500665

FULBERT 八路军被服厂李厂长 (talk) 15:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
八路军被服厂李厂长, Nice edit. Current. FULBERT (talk) 20:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WEEK4 / ADDING CITATION / dyy122dyy

1. The article I read is Confucius. The journal I read talks about Confucius's political attitude. "Ren" is the idea provided by Confucius. 2. The link to the difference is: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Confucius&type=revision&diff=981635437&oldid=980984464 3. This work is challenging but fun. I have to carefully and rationally read the articles and find the plague definition that needs to be explained more thoroughly. After finding the plague information, I read many journals that explain the definition. Dyy122dyy (talk) 15:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dyy122dyy, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. Also, I see your edit was reverted. Reply here about your thoughts related to this, and you will be current then. FULBERT (talk) 22:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT, I have already assigned myself the article in wiki edu dashboard. WIKI said the idea "ren" was mentioned above, but "ren" is a political idea which is better to be mentioned in the section of "politics" and explained in here. If the edit was reverted, do I need to do a new citation? Also, I find my week 3 post was missing and I don't know why. Dyy122dyy (talk) 22:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dyy122dyy, Good explanation that may not have been clear to that other editor. This is fine for now. Current. FULBERT (talk) 19:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:York University and Talk:Isko Moreno on "Social sciences and society" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 / Add a Citation to One Article / CaptainJoseph

In this week's exercise, I assigned myself Chinese philosophy as my exercise article. By going through that article, I identified a gap in that article which is how does those ancient philosophers influence modern society. After I look though articles, I find one that best fit for this gap and I used that article as my citation. Here is the difference between two versions. In this exercise, I learned how to identify gaps in wiki article and how to use the library to find out article to fill this vacancy. CaptainJoseph (talk) 01:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CaptainJoseph, Nice edit. Current. FULBERT (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 / Add a Citation to One Article / Bbbzhu

The article I edited this week is Augmented Reality. I included a citation to one of the arguments already in the article to support it. It is about the use of augmented reality in museums and art galleries. Here's the difference [link].
I learned about the importance of using quality sources and what counts as a quality source. Also, how to paraphrase the source to be inserted as a reference to a Wikipedia article. --Bbbzhu (talk) 04:17, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bbbzhu, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT, I have assigned myself this article. --Bbbzhu (talk) 01:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
79 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Cognitive processing therapy (talk) Add sources
2,123 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (talk) Add sources
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Direction générale des études et recherches (talk) Add sources
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C SYNGAP1-related intellectual disability (talk) Add sources
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Social communication disorder (talk) Add sources
48 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Recombinant factor VIIa (talk) Add sources
239 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C FOLFOX (talk) Cleanup
75 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Ludwig Klages (talk) Cleanup
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Allegiance bias (talk) Cleanup
71 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Revilo P. Oliver (talk) Expand
18 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Mamakating, New York (talk) Expand
3,503 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Me Too movement (talk) Expand
1,611 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Democratic Socialists of America (talk) Unencyclopaedic
723 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Social construction of gender (talk) Unencyclopaedic
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Language MOOC (talk) Unencyclopaedic
243 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Nightmare disorder (talk) Merge
269 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Open content (talk) Merge
132 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Share-alike (talk) Merge
203 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Gender essentialism (talk) Wikify
299 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Tarot of Marseilles (talk) Wikify
118 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Ragdoll physics (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders (talk) Orphan
9 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Psychosensory therapy (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Yaariv Khaykin (talk) Orphan
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Otamixaban (talk) Stub
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Eldred, New York (talk) Stub
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ciraparantag (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Direct therapeutic exposure (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Columbia–Princeton Electronic Music Center (album) (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Saruplase (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Vivienne Goonewardene on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week3 / Copyedit an Article / Muzizimu

I removed a comma before "and" because I think the comma is not necessary. Please see my difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Body_shape&type=revision&diff=981803437&oldid=979596733 I learned how to copyedit an article and not all articles are perfect. Muzizimu (talk) 14:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muzizimu, Nice basic edit that helps improve the article. Current. FULBERT (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Toro de la Vega on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2020)

Hello, FULBERT.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Trout Mask Replica

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: August 2016 Aden bombing • Pig Latin

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Week 4 / Add a citation to One Article / ywrhea

1. The article I chose is https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ageism#Implicit_ageism This article introduces the background of implicit ageism and how implicit ageism influence individual's behavior. Futhermore, the article reviews two methods that have been widely used to measure implicit ageism and relevant research findings. 2. The link to the difference is https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/981919992. 3. Through this process, I found some statements in Wikipedia are not trustworthy enough. Even though it has resources that can be traced, it might not state the definition clearly and may miss some important points. Therefore, we should be more careful when we edit our Wikipedia articles. Ywrhea (talk) 05:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 2 / Evaluate an Article / NorvinCharles

Evaluated an article on Impression Management. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NorvinCharles/Evaluate_an_Article

NorvinCharles Please remember to sign each of your posts using four tilde characters ~~~~ at the end. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. --- FULBERT (talk) 19:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #436

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Discussions
  • Events
    • Upcoming: Next Linked Data for Libraries LD4 Wikidata Affinity Group call: Professor Toby Hudson on Entity Explosion, a browser extension which allows you to get information about entities on the web page you’re visiting, 06 October. Agenda
    • Upcoming: Wikidata & Wikibase office hour, October 27th at 17:00 CEST (15:00 GMT)
    • Upcoming: plenty of events for the Wikidata birthday, check the calendar and feel free to organise one!
  • Tool of the week
    • IllWill.js is a userscript that searches Wikidata for foreign-language sitelinks, to populate Template:ill and replace plain red links on other Wikimedia projects.
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
    • omeka-s-wikidata is a new module for the open source GLAM collection management software Omeka, that allows cataloguers to use Wikidata as a vocabulary for persons, places, subjects, etc.
  • Development
    • First pieces of the Query Builder are coming together and we are working towards making it generate the first dumb query
    • Talking to people about their thoughts on checking Wikidata's data against other databases. If you're interested reach out to Mohammed.
    • Got some first internal feedback for the REST API specification draft. We'll publish it for feedback in the next days.
    • Fixing an issue with certain language codes no longer being available (phab:T264294)
    • Working on making sure blocked bots don't waste Item IDs when trying to create new Items (phab:T232620)

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.

Week 4 / Add a Citation to One Article / ASCXX

1. This is the article I edited this week: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald%27s

2. This is the diff page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=McDonald%27s&diff=982056397&oldid=982005831

3. I learned by adding more detailed information can make the articale more clear and accurate. The part I edited was takling about international menu variations, however, it only has limited examples of other countries' menu. By adding more supportive evidence, I enriched the information of this part of article. ASCXX (talk) 23:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ASCXX, Great edit. Current. --FULBERT (talk) 00:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 / Add a Citation to One Article / 燕京赵大知识分子

Since I am interested in some finance theories, I found an article talking about time value of money as a theory which could benefit investors. The article explains it well but lacks sufficient citation to support, so I searched online and found a credible source which explains this theory in a very similar fashion. Here is the difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rate_of_return&diff=982088013&oldid=980105037

I learned that even for mature theory, adding a citation can better support your point, and let readers have more space to expand on the topic. 燕京赵大知识分子 (talk) 03:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

燕京赵大知识分子, Nice initial edit. Current. FULBERT (talk) 12:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WEEK1 / INTRIDUCTION / Rc4230

Hello, everyone, my name is Ruojie Chen. You can call me Jessie if you want. I graduated from Shanghai University of International Business and Economics. This is my third semester at NYU. My major is MASY with Database concentration. Now, I am an intern at an Internet Company in China. Hope we will have a wonderful semester together.Rc4230 (talk) 12:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rc4230, Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you find this an interesting and rewarding experience! FULBERT (talk) 12:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 3/Copyedit an article/Forza spurs

This is the link of the artilce I have edited:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009%E2%80%9310_A.C._Milan_season. Besides, this is the link of the difference: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2009%E2%80%9310_A.C._Milan_season&diff=982147426&oldid=978649769.In this process, I have learned about the way to find an appropriate article.Forza spurs (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forza spurs, Please complete Assignment 2 before I review this one, as we cannot skip steps in this process. Ping me here when done and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 13:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry that I forgot to add a talk section for assignment#2. I will start a new section for that soon. Thank you!Forza spurs (talk) 13:24, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Forza spurs, Great. Current on Week 3. FULBERT (talk) 13:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 2/Evaluate an article/Forza spurs

I selected the article introducing Christian Abbiati, who is a former AC MILAN player. I am a fan of Milan as well as Abbiati himself. Here is the link of the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Abbiati. After my evaluation, I believe that there should be a citation to explain an event in his career and the following is the link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christian_Abbiati&diff=982152533&oldid=979300979. In the process of evaluation, I realized that when we are assessing an article, many aspects need to be taken into consideration, especially the sources of information must be reliable. Besides, I found that the tools provided by Wiki are very useful.Forza spurs (talk) 13:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forza spurs, Reliable information is key! Current. FULBERT (talk) 13:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 2 / Evaluate an Article / lipute17

I assigned myself "Men in Black (film series)" to edit. I was a big fan of the movie series when I was a a kid. I have watched the series at least ten times. I think this is really a great opportunity for me to contribute to the movie series that I really like, and make more people to be familiar with the movie setups.

talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Men_in_Black_(film_series)#We_should_add_Character_Description_to_the_Article

evaluation page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lipute17/Evaluate_an_Article

From the experience, I really feel like I am a member of the wikipedia society. My efforts makes the article more fluent to read. Lipute17 (talk) 17:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lipute17, Please finish the assignment for this week and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. There are more questions to consider with the article review than you listed there. FULBERT (talk) 22:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT I have added more information in my evaluation. Lipute17 (talk) 23:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lipute17, Fine. Current. FULBERT (talk) 17:39, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 / Add a Citation to One Article / Muzizimu

I read through an article called Dynamic clothing simulation based on skeletal motion of the human body and added few sentence on Body Shape. The differences link:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Body_shape&type=revision&diff=982188009&oldid=981803437 I learned that Wikipedia is an open source for anyone to edit and correct user's mistake which is a very friendly and continent environment.Muzizimu (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muzizimu, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 22:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT I just assigned the article, please take a look at it, thank you!Muzizimu (talk) 00:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Muzizimu, Good edit. Current. FULBERT (talk) 20:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week3 / Copyedit an Article / lipute17

I perform some minor gramma modifications towards the article "backpropagation" to make it more easy to read and understand.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Backpropagation&type=revision&diff=982194306&oldid=976774279

I have learned that for scientific articles, it is very important to not only let the material very precise, but also make it readable to people. It is very necessary to make the concept straight forward that even people without background knowledge can also understand. Lipute17 (talk) 22:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lipute17, Please remember to sign each of your posts using four tilde characters ~~~~ at the end. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. --FULBERT (talk) 22:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT I have signed the post.Lipute17 (talk) 22:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lipute17, Overall ok, but watch your spelling when you make edits. Done. FULBERT (talk) 17:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4/ Add a Citation to One Article/ Haomimimi

1. The article that I edit is Green Tax. I find that there is barely explanation of this concept about what it is, so I add the explanation. And here is the link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_tax#

2. The link to the difference is: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carbon_tax&type=revision&diff=982214505&oldid=981634730

3. What I learned is that when we explain a concept, it is more important to introduce what it is and the background, and its meaning. Then it would be much easy to understand. Haomimimi (talk) 20:24, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FULBERT This is my Week 4 HW.
Haomimimi, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 22:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4/Add a citation to one article/Forza spurs

The article to which I chose to add a citation is the article introducing Jesús Joaquín Fernández Sáenz de la Torre(known as suso), who isa professional soccer player. The link to the article is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suso_(footballer)#Club_career. In addition, the link to diff is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suso_(footballer)&diff=982323974&oldid=981292318. In this process, I learned that although sometimes an article in WIKE seems complete and detailed, it is still possible to find some contents that have not been expalined deeply enough.Forza spurs (talk) 13:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forza spurs, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 20:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have assigned the article to me, please check that. Thank you. Forza spurs (talk) 16:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Forza spurs, Fine now. Current. FULBERT (talk) 16:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5/Add a citation and contribute to one article/Forza spurs

I added a citation to an article introducing Fabricio Oberto who is a former NBA player. The citation I added can give readers more detailed statistics and make a complement to the content about his rookie year in NBA. The following is the link to the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabricio_Oberto#NBA_career. In addition, here is the link to diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fabricio_Oberto&diff=982328680&oldid=954702775. After this assignment, I looked back to the defnition "content gap" learned during previous weeks and I have realized that it is quite important to remdy this kind of gap.Forza spurs (talk) 14:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forza spurs, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 20:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have assigned this article to myself and please check that. Thank you! Forza spurs (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Forza spurs, Fine. Current. FULBERT (talk) 16:59, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / JS11323

The article I chose is called "Manatee" and this is my favorite species. The citation I added can provide the close relatives of the manatee. The following is the link to the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manatee. Here is the link of difference between revisions: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manatee&type=revision&diff=982581943&oldid=981578742. After doing this assignment, I knew more about how to add citations in an article, and I knew more what is called "content gap", which is useful for me. --Js11323 (talk) 01:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Js11323, Your edit was reverted in less than an hour; wow, that was fast! I would have reverted your edit due to its not being a high-level, objective source, but overall good enough for this assignment. Current. FULBERT (talk) 16:24, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / 燕京赵大知识分子

I added a citation to the article to better explain the definition and background of the theory of undervalued stock. The citation from Investopedia explains it well to readers with both financial and non-financial backgrounds.

Here is the difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Undervalued_stock&type=revision&diff=982602029&oldid=944827142

Here is the article link： https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undervalued_stock

I learned that it is useful to add a citation to a concept's definition no matter if the author is familiar with it. This way readers can extend their reading and connect to the explanation the author makes. 燕京赵大知识分子 (talk) 05:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

燕京赵大知识分子, OK citation, though you did not add anything else of content to this article, which was part of the assignment, "lso include a sentence or two to express your contribution in context and demonstrate how it adds to the knowledge in the article." Please add and ping me here and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 16:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 / Add a Citation to One Article / Lipute17

The article I viewed this week is "Denial-of-service attack", which is a form of cyber attack that is widely performed nowadays. I notice that a very popular used defense technique "DDS" do not have any references, so I dig in and added some citations.

The link to my modification is:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Denial-of-service_attack&diff=982727684&oldid=982658401

From this week's material I learned how to add reference into articles. Reference is very essential because it increase the creditability of the article and makes it more convincing.Lipute17 (talk) 23:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lipute17, I undid your change as you did not use a high quality source for your edit, you used a company page. Please find a high quality source for your claim and re-add. Ping me here when done. FULBERT (talk) 17:50, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT,Sorry for that, I used another source this time. here is my new link. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Denial-of-service_attack&diff=983040792&oldid=983005206. Lipute17 (talk) 21:59, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / lipute17

The article I assigned myself this week is Frontier Communication, a large telecommunication company that recently just file for bankruptcy. I notice that the article hardly updated the information for the bankruptcy, so I added some more information to the page.

The diff link : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frontier_Communications&diff=982730527&oldid=980106590

I feel very good in contribute to the article to make it up to date. I believe the process is very meaningful because the society is changing rapidly, Old information may be inaccurate over night. It is very necessary to update the message on wiki to prevent misleading. Lipute17 (talk) 23:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lipute17, Nice addition. Done. FULBERT (talk) 17:51, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week1/ Introduction/ Mavin2516

Hello everyone, I'm Yiyou D.I have great interest in the field of business informatics and this will provide a me a platform to further explore in my field of interest. On the other hand I'm a football fan and player.Mavin2516 (talk) 09:26, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mavin2516, Didn't you already begin this with a different username? FULBERT (talk) 17:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

week2/Evaluate an Article/Amandaerfeng

Hi FULBERT, here's the link to my evaluation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amandaerfeng/Evaluate_an_Article I use to think all Wikipedia article are written by experts, now that I see the mistakes I know it is so not true. I also free excited that I can contribute to the community in some way. I changed one coma as a start, link to diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Modern_Family&diff=prev&oldid=982820342 Amandaerfeng (talk) 15:23, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amandaerfeng, Nice, simple (and helpful) edit. Done. FULBERT (talk) 18:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

week 3/Copyedit an article/ Amandaerfeng

Here is the link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shampoo&diff=prev&oldid=982825474 The article I choose is shampoo. I realized how many articles that are start class and has no bibiography yet. They all have some kind of small mistakes that can be fixed. Amandaerfeng (talk) 16:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amandaerfeng, I think the tense may have initially been ok as it was, though I think this is still fine. Done. FULBERT (talk) 18:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 2/Evaluate an article/Rc4230

I chose an article about Youyou Tu, who is the first Chinese Nobel laureate in physiology or medicine. The link of the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_Youyou#Awards_and_honours. I added a citation to explain her research experience. Here is the difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tu_Youyou&type=revision&diff=982822308&oldid=982462049. In the process of evaluation, I realized that the articles in the Wiki also have many errors and need to be corrected. I felt very satisfied after adding a citation in the article.Rc4230 (talk) 16:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rc4230, This is fine, though you did not follow this week's assignment for how to write up an evaluation of an article. OK for now. Done. FULBERT (talk) 18:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

week 4/ add citation to an article/ Amandaerfeng

Here is the link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Body_shaming&diff=prev&oldid=982837933 I edit a little after that:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Body_shaming&diff=prev&oldid=982838076 The article I assgined is body shaming, and i am surprised it has a start class article as well. Basiclly the article is pretty thorough, I just add more information to make it a better one.Amandaerfeng (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amandaerfeng, Useful edit. Done. FULBERT (talk) 18:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week2 / Evaluation / Shangyingsun

Through this assignment training, I learned how to search an great article and how to edit in my dashboard to evaluate an article. I write the advantage and disadvantage of the article. the article is great, and easy to understanding. maybe give more information about modern advertising postcard, that will be helpful to this topic. I am graphic designer, so I chose this article to evaluate. 2.The link to the article is : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising_postcard 3.The evaluation link is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shangyingsun/Evaluate_an_Article Shangyingsun (talk) 18:06, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shangyingsun, Nice evaluation. Done. FULBERT (talk) 18:24, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

week 5/ Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article/ Amandaerfeng

Here is the link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boston_Terrier&diff=prev&oldid=982847591 This time I chose Boston terrier as my topic since I have one at home. I spent too much time finding a useful link for the article, but end up reuse the reference the article has since it missed some information.Amandaerfeng (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amandaerfeng, I agree with the revert on this, as Instagram is not a reliable source for Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links/Perennial_websites. Can you re-add one to this article or to another one and then ping me again here? FULBERT (talk) 18:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week3 / Copyedit an article / Shangyingsun

In this part, I edited the article and made a change on it, I removed the "Canada's", I think it is unnecessary word before the "Canada post Corporation. Here is the link of the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising_postcard#Direct-mail here is the link of the difference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising_postcard From this part of training, I learned how read the article detailing and know what is necessary to the article and what is unnecessary or extra word to the article.Shangyingsun (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shangyingsun, Please provide the diff per WP:DIFF to your change and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 18:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / Muzizimu

I added a citation to the article called "Bee hummingbird" to better understand which area do bee hummingbird likes to stay. Here is the difference link:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Bee_hummingbird&type=revision&diff=982853910&oldid=982809972 After week5, I had a deeper understanding of how to cite a source and how to explain a topic in details in order to make articles from Wiki more useful.Muzizimu (talk) 19:38, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muzizimu, The link to your diff did not work. Please fix and ping me here and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 18:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT, sorry about that, please check the link again: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bee_hummingbird&type=revision&diff=982853910&oldid=982809972, thank you!

Week4 / Add a citation to one Article / Shangyingsun

The article that I chose is Arizona State University, this is my undergraduate school. I saw the article showed "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links". I did some change, remove the "Arizona State" after the "ASU or", add add Arizona State University Art Museum and give the citation on the tempe campus part. here is the difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arizona_State_University&diff=prev&oldid=982856797 from this work, I learned to find more article that need to improve, and how to add citation on the Wikipedia, focus on the detail.Shangyingsun (talk) 20:06, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shangyingsun, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 18:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / Shangyingsun

This time, the article that I chose is Herberger Institute for Design and the Arts, add one citation on the art school, here is the link of the difference https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Herberger_Institute_for_Design_and_the_Arts&diff=prev&oldid=982860152 Through this part of work, I read the link of the article that professor provide on the Guide(s) for Working on Articles in Your Topic Area - Art history. Last time, I did some change on Arizona state university, this time I did change on the Herberger institute, it is one of the institute of ASU, it get more deeper and more specific on the article. I read it carefully and checked all the grammar and spelling, it is helpful to me and let me know how the wikipedia's article important to reader. Shangyingsun (talk) 20:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shangyingsun, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 18:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 1 / Create a Wikipedia Account / Nectaros

In this first week assignment, I created an account and learned basic navigation of Wikipedia. Much of the tutorial information was new to me. I look forward to editing pages in this class and contributing to the research community here on Wikipedia.

Nectaros (talk) 23:10, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nectaros, Welcome to Wikipedia! Done with Week 1. FULBERT (talk) 18:32, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nectaros

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / 八路军被服厂李厂长

This week, I had review my studies about option market, just curiosity about what does the wiki reviews on call options. So I find this article and add one great resource to the page. This is a book wrote by an expert and he provide insights on the reality of the financial market, for those who had interests to the option market. I hope they can find this book to read for more details.

Here is the link to the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_option#Price_of_options Here is the link to the difference https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Call_option&type=revision&diff=982889183&oldid=972093745

What I learned from this week is that wiki sometimes not provide quality resources for reader to read, so if anyone want to quote form Wiki, I would suggest you quote form wiki's reference, and it is more useful.--八路军被服厂李厂长 (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

八路军被服厂李厂长, Per this week's assignment, please "also include a sentence or two to express your contribution in context and demonstrate how it adds to the knowledge in the article." Ping me here when finished and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 18:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT I added some explanations on what is out-the-money and hope that readers could be more clearly about the call option. Here is the link for difference https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Call_option&type=revision&diff=983019312&oldid=983018499--八路军被服厂李厂长 (talk) 19:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 3/Copyedit an Article/DetongChe

Here's the article I copyedited: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego, and this is difference between the previous version and the current one: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lego&type=revision&diff=982901146&oldid=980285594. I have changed the unit for this sentence: "Other records include a 34-metre (112 ft) tower and a 4 km (2.5 mi) railway." because there are two numbers in one sentence, I think the unit should match with both. I have learned number is the best way to let review have a good understanding and be careful to use number. DetongChe (talk) 02:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DetongChe, Good edit. Current. FULBERT (talk) 18:41, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 3 / Copyedit an Article / ShawnBoom

The article I chose is Sustainable consumer behavior and performs some gramma modification. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sustainable_consumer_behaviour&type=revision&diff=982906599&oldid=979288855 What I chose is an article on the application of psychology in business called consumer psychology, which studies why and how consumers incorporate sustainability issues into their consumer behavior. It studies how consumers choose products and how to combine these products with personal sustainable consumption goals.--ShawnBoom (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ShawnBoom, Good edits. Done. FULBERT (talk) 18:47, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4/Add a Citation to One Article/DetongChe

I have a Miniature Schnauzer, so I search this article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miniature_Schnauzer) and I have never heard about "UK Kennel Club". Then I added a citation to this article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kennel_Club) under the health part. Hope this citation help more people have a good understanding. This link shows the difference between revisions: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miniature_Schnauzer&type=revision&diff=982907866&oldid=982712683. Since not all people know and understand your article's reference, a citation is very important for the reviewer to understand the article and your idea. DetongChe (talk) 03:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DetongChe, Avoid using Wikipedia as a source for itself per WP:NOTSOURCE. Cite external, reliable sources as evidence to support your claims per WP:VERIFY. Replace the source you used with one that is more reliable, and ping me here to review it. FULBERT (talk) 18:44, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 / Add a Citation to One Article / ShawnBoom

The Article I chose is 'Bernese Mountain Dog', that's my most wanted dog for a long time and I will purchase one if I move to a pup-friendly apartment. I want to know more background about the Bernese Mountain Dog and the article states that "Bred from crosses of Mastiffs and guard-type breeds", but I am not familiar with Mastiffs so I add a citation on that to help the reader know more about the breed. Here is my difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bernese_Mountain_Dog&type=revision&diff=982911161&oldid=982910914 --ShawnBoom (talk) 03:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ShawnBoom, I reverted your edit, as Wikipedia should not be used a source for itself. Please find a more reliable source to add and then ping me here. FULBERT (talk) 18:50, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment professor, I already replaced a new resource. Here is a new difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bernese_Mountain_Dog&type=revision&diff=983042301&oldid=983042097 Please check it and let me you what you think, thank you.--ShawnBoom (talk) 22:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / ywrhea

1. The summary of citation I added is that the contact effects generalize to other groups other than racial or ethnic groups. Under Allport's optimal contact conditions, the contact could lead to greater reduction in prejudice.

2. The link to difference is https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/982912285.

3. There are some contents in Wikipedia do not cite specific references, which cannot readily be traced to their sources. By providing reliable references can make wiki articles more convincing. Therefore, we should be more careful when we edit on Wikipedia. Ywrhea (talk) 03:58, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ywrhea, Per the assignment, please add more to "also include a sentence or two to express your contribution in context and demonstrate how it adds to the knowledge in the article." Ping me here when done and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 18:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / ASCXX

1. this is the article:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structured_interview

2. this is the diff:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Structured_interview&diff=982914150&oldid=963129918

3. This week, I edited a small topic article: Structured Interview. I added a sentence conclusion to specified the strength of a structured interview. Even though I only added a short sentence, but I feel happy that I made a little contribution to the article and Wikipedia. ASCXX (talk) 04:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ASCXX, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 18:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I just assgiend it on the Wiki Edu Dashboard. Thank you for your reminder!
ASCXX, Please remember to sign your posts. Please sign this and ping me when done and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi professor, what do you mean by signing my post? Should I leave my name somewhere? Thank you in advance.ASCXX (talk) 21:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / CaptainJoseph

I chose Determinism as my article this week. I provide an extra reference to this article and point out Determinism is about interaction which affect our cognitive processes in our life. Here is the difference between the previous version and the current one.

During this week assignment, I learned how to provide more information without my own bias. CaptainJoseph (talk) 19:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CaptainJoseph, Please remember to sign each of your posts using four tilde characters ~~~~ at the end. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 18:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FULBERT: I have done that, thank you professor! CaptainJoseph (talk) 19:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CaptainJoseph, Please remember to sign each of your posts using four tilde characters ~~~~ at the end. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 19:08, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FULBERT: Sorry for my misunderstanding. CaptainJoseph (talk) 19:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CaptainJoseph, OK, signed now fine, though I do not understand what you mean in your add on the article, "Determinism is about interaction which affect our cognitive processes in our life." Can you explain that a bit? It is not quite clear to me. The source itself is ok, this is only about what you meant. FULBERT (talk) 19:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FULBERT: Sure professor. It basically means that Determinism is about the cause and the result of what we have done in our life. Cause and result are always bounded together in our cognitive processes, so if we have sufficient information about a object we might predict every move of that object including human being. That is just A point of view of Determinism. CaptainJoseph (talk) 19:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / ShawnBoom

The article I chose this week is "Liopleurodon", this is my favorite see-creature belong to prehistoric time. I notice that the couple definitions are not so clear if the readers not familiar with those creatures. So I just make a citation to help easy to understand. Here is the difference-link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liopleurodon&type=revision&diff=982919961&oldid=982859273 --ShawnBoom (talk) 05:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ShawnBoom, See the revert comment another editor made. Find and use a reliable source for this and re-ping me here. FULBERT (talk) 18:51, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment professor, I already replaced a new resource. Here is a new difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liopleurodon&type=revision&diff=983028270&oldid=982923989 Please check it and let me know what you think, thank you.--ShawnBoom (talk) 20:29, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5/Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article/DetongChe

I choose an artist who comes from Japan, I have researched him when I take graphic design classes. Here's the article link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takashi_Murakami, and I added the citation link is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animation. Since the "Animation Industry" did not have a good explanation in the article, so I added a sentence to the article. This is the link for difference between revisions: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Takashi_Murakami&type=revision&diff=982919994&oldid=981538443. After week 5, I clearly know a good citation is very significant for the article, also will be better for the reviewer to read the article with the right meaning. DetongChe (talk) 05:39, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DetongChe, I reverted your edit as Wikipedia cannot be used as a source for itself. Please find a more reliable source for your claim and ping me here again and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 18:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week3 / Copyedited an article /Rc4230

Here is the link of the article I have edited: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DiDi. And this is the link of the difference: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DiDi&type=revision&diff=982931868&oldid=982929425. I capitalize "d" to keep consistency. In this process, I have learned that every small error correction will make the article more perfect.Rc4230 (talk) 07:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rc4230, Good catch. Done. FULBERT (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 / Add a Citation to One Article / Rc4230

Since the topic of my homework is related to shared bicycles, so I chose the article introducing bicycle-sharing. In the history part, I think the article lacks sufficient citations to support, so I added a citation to make the article more credible. The difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bicycle-sharing_system&type=revision&diff=982938353&oldid=978399019.

In this process, I learned that adding citations can make the article more accurate and credible.Rc4230 (talk) 08:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rc4230, Nice citation added. Done. FULBERT (talk) 18:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / Rc4230

Since I am interested in big data technology, I chose an article talking about big data. In the characteristics part, I think the explanation of the volume of big data needs to be more specific, so I add a sentence to explain the size of big data. The difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Big_data&type=revision&diff=982941579&oldid=982644985 Even though I only added one sentence, I am still happy for my contribution.Rc4230 (talk) 09:10, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rc4230, Nice edit. Done. FULBERT (talk) 18:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
47 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Berlin, Berlin (talk) Add sources
3,463 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Anxiety (talk) Add sources
407 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Neurodevelopmental disorder (talk) Add sources
1,360 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Psychotherapy (talk) Add sources
29 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Narrative exposure therapy (talk) Add sources
46 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B The Story of B (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Barcelona Metròpolis (talk) Cleanup
228 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Anti-realism (talk) Cleanup
168 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Health technology (talk) Cleanup
249 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Venous thrombosis (talk) Expand
23 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy (talk) Expand
51 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Liberty, New York (talk) Expand
177 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Artificial heart valve (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,074 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Voter suppression in the United States (talk) Unencyclopaedic
576 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Class (computer programming) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
740 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Bayesian network (talk) Merge
138 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Bilkis Dadi (talk) Merge
282 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Loose coupling (talk) Merge
94 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Participative decision-making in organizations (talk) Wikify
303 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Theories about religions (talk) Wikify
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Computing Community Consortium (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Positivistic animism (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start International Association for Physicians in Aesthetic Medicine (talk) Orphan
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Rural Health Workforce and The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Inogatran (talk) Stub
18 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Surfing in the United States (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Cyprus Postal Services (talk) Stub
29 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Vancouver Warriors (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Fritz Klein (historian) (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Euphorbia decidua (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 2 / Evaluate Article / Nectaros

In this section, I completed an evaluation of Augmented Reality article, here: Augmented Reality. I noted that the Possible Applications section could be expanded and that the Privacy Concerns citation could use more citations. I left some feedback on the article's Talk page. Diff link is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Augmented_reality&curid=231173&diff=982977172&oldid=982971858. In this section, I learned how to insert links and leave feedback. I am still figuring out the headers on Talk pages to leave feedback.

Nectaros (talk) 19:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FULBERT

(testing signature and pinging)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nectaros (talk • contribs) 14:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nectaros, Please remember to sign each of your posts using four tilde characters ~~~~ at the end. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. --- FULBERT (talk) 18:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 3 / Copyedit an Article / Nectaros

For this section, I added a citation and copyedited a sentence for word choice in Virtual reality therapy. The link to the diff is https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virtual_reality_therapy&type=revision&diff=982988347&oldid=981561301

I learned how adding a citation in the source code automatically adds the source in the references below on an article. I learned how to make small copyedits for work choice and typos.

Nectaros (talk) 16:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nectaros, The link does not work; please fix it and ping me here and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 18:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@FULBERT:

New link to diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virtual_reality_therapy&type=revision&diff=982988347&oldid=981561301 Nectaros (talk) 19:50, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week3/Assignment3/Soymilkp20

For this week i add a incitation to the article i found. It should had be there, but for some reason it was not.

Here is the link for the differ:Link

Soymilkp20 (talk) 16:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soymilkp20, I reverted your edit as it was to a company site and not to a high-quality, reliable source. Please find a better sourse and re-add. Ping me here when done and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 19:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FULBERT:That source was not from me it was the ordinary source that from the article, i just did the in text citation. Soymilkp20 (talk) 20:08, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week4/Adding a citation to an article/Soymilkp20

For this week i add a source to an article(Lotion), it was about parabens. Also a small change of the article, i remove a word to make the sentence more readable. Here is the link:Link

For this assignment, i learned that the sources we provided need to be public, it block me for one because, the source can be only see for NYU students only. That was the reason why we mention in the class, we need public sources. Which i have a question for that, if some sources can been seen only by certain people, what is the point. I know we pay for it, but still. Soymilkp20 (talk) 17:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soymilkp20, I am not sure I understand what you mean about a source being public; sources in Wikipedia articles need to be of high quality. However, this source you added was to a partisan group, and as such I agree with the editor who removed it. Please find another, high-quality source and add to this or a different article. Ping me when done. FULBERT (talk) 19:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, i edited another article here is the link:History of basketball The reason why i choose to doing that is because some part of the article still needs expansion. Here is what i did:differ

I learn that if the article need more explanation, there is clear note for it, so if people really want to improve the article, that could be a start. That is the reason why i change the article. I want to make a change.

FULBERT

Soymilkp20 (talk) 01:48, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 / Add a Citation to One Article / Nectaros

I added a citation to Commercial Augmented Reality in the summary for dressing room applications. Diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commercial_augmented_reality&type=revision&diff=983003216&oldid=921537030. I learned about manual insertion of citations, since the source would not auto-populate. Nectaros (talk) 17:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nectaros, The link does not work; please fix it and ping me here and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 18:36, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT New diff link here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commercial_augmented_reality&type=revision&diff=983003216&oldid=921537030

Nectaros (talk) 19:52, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / Nectaros

In this section, for the article [[Virtual reality sickness]] I contributed and cited more recent research in the section "Individual differences in susceptibility." Link to diff here. I learned that looking at the recency of the research is important for determining notability. There seems quite a bit of inconsistency in agreement among researchers as to whether gender/sex is a clear factor in the susceptibility of virtual reality sickness and the article did not represent that disagreement prior to my edit.

Nectaros (talk) 17:44, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nectaros, The first link is to an article that does not exist. Please fix and ping me and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 18:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FULBERT Link to first article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality_sickness

Nectaros (talk) 19:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week2/ Evaluate Article/ Martinmadison

I found an article talks about the Railway transit system and it primarily focuses on MTR, one of the most successful transit systems in the world. It's famous for its reliability and financial performance. In the part that talks about the revenue, the original article only talks about the investment from property holding. However, its ticket revenue also contributes a lot and has some great statistics compared to transit systems elsewhere.

This is the link to the article evaluation itself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Martinmadison/Evaluate_an_Article

This is the link to the difference of talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARail_transport_in_Hong_Kong&type=revision&diff=983005590&oldid=980320299

The process is much more complicated than I expected. It's more like a mini-research which involves a couple of steps: reading through current articles, doing research on the subject itself, and determine the gap of information. Martinmadison (talk) 18:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Martinmadison, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 19:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Martinmadison, I reviewed it per your comment below. This is now fine. Current. FULBERT (talk) 19:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 3/ Add a citation / Martinmadison

Link to the article itself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_supply_unit_(computer) Link to the change : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Power_supply_unit_%28computer%29&type=revision&diff=983014290&oldid=983014117

In the subsection that talks about a new concept called "single rail 12 V only", the article pointed out the benefit of eliminating cross-road interruption but forgot to cite other research results to support the statement. Wheater in the Wiki article or other papers, a key statement should always be equipped with supporting evidence to convince the reader about the idea. Martinmadison (talk) 18:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Martinmadison, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 19:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've assigned both articles to myself in the Wiki Dashboard.Martinmadison (talk) 19:29, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Martinmadison, I reverted this as you did not cite a reliable source. Please find a high-quality, reliable source, and re-edit it. Ping me here when done. FULBERT (talk) 19:50, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Link to the latest diff, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Power_supply_unit_%28computer%29&type=revision&diff=983025786&oldid=983022853 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinmadison (talk • contribs) 20:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 / Adding contents and a citation to the article/ Martinmadison

Link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long-Term_Capital_Management&type=revision&diff=983018459&oldid=982572714

Summary of what I added: This part talked about why Long Term Capital Management failed even though they hired the best scientists to build the perfect model. The model is very ideal and powerful to solve problems, but it's not intelligent enough to recognize random or extreme events such as the financial crises. Also, LTCM was biased when selecting a data sample for the modeling work. Those two reasons illustrate how miscalculation being part of the reasons they failed.

What I learned: This assignment is more complicated compared to previous ones. Not only I needed to do research on the topic and provide good sources and citations, but also I need to double-check if there is already similar content available here or if there is a conflict. Overall it's a good practice. Martinmadison (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week2/ Evaluation/ Mavin2516

The article i evaluated was titled Business Informatics. The article turned out to be well structured with detailed introduction and body. The references were a bit outdated with since they were older than 5 years though the links provided were working. The link to my evaluation is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mavin2516/Evaluate_an_Article?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_evaluate_article My edit version of the article link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_informatics The Evaluation process helped me realize how important it is to clearly structure your work for easy reading and understanding.Mavin2516 (talk) 19:36, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week3/ Copyedit/ Mavin2516

I chose an article titled Environmental science. I edited some punctuation and spelling errors as well as changed some few words to bring out the meaning more clearly. Here is the link to my Edit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_science

Week4/ Citation/ Mavin2516

Added some details on the article and a cited the details.Mavin2516 (talk) 20:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week5/ Citation/ Mavin2516

I chose an article with title Ecology for this week's citation. Here is the link to the edit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EcologyMavin2516 (talk) 20:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5/ Add a citation to article/ Martinmadison

Link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Setback_%28architecture%29&type=revision&diff=983027883&oldid=968159182

The article talks about the setback policy in urban planning. I added a term called base height which is a crucial part of the policy based on the Zoning Glossary provided by the Department of City Planning (NYC). With the idea of base height, viewers can better understand the setback policy and how it works. Martinmadison (talk) 20:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

week5/add a citation/soymilkp20

I add a citation to the article VitaminB. The article i found in NYU library. I cit it as it in the source aspect. Here is the Link:differ

I made a cup of changes, cause i had trouble of citing the article, but i figured it out eventually. Soymilkp20 (talk) 21:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2020)

Many species can live at high altitudes. For example, the Himalayan pika lives at altitudes up to 4,200 m (13,800 ft).
Hello, FULBERT.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Organisms at high altitude

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Trout Mask Replica • August 2016 Aden bombing

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 12 October 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Week 1/ Introduction/ LaurenZhou0509

Hi guys! This is Lauren Zhou. I am happy to meet you guys here in Wikipedia. Before came to NYC, I have spent several years in Chicago. I finished my undergraduate in UIUC. It is a beautiful place with interesting people. NYC is different from Chicago; it is busier but I enjoy the new environment. This is my second semester in NYU and hopefully we will spend a good time together! I started to use Wiki a long time ago but this is the first time I become an editor. The role changing makes me feel exited. Enjoy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaurenZhou0509 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 5 / Add a Citation and Contribute to One Article / Bbbzhu

This week I edited the playtest page. Here's the difference [[1]]. I included the role of playtesting in the process of video game development. Also included a very comprehensive systematic review of the subject as the citation, in case readers would like to know more. I found that although the concept is similar, the language to capture a concept can be different (a variant or slang) and result in different Wikipedia pages. Thus, making sure all variants are up to date and can be related to each other is important. --Bbbzhu (talk) 01:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 2 / Evaluation Article / LaurenZhou0509

1. I learned how to evaluate an article through this week's task. The guidelines and questions in every section make it easier for me to understand what is a good article and what an article should focus on when published. I choose "Case Closed" as my article since I am big fan to this series and I hope to evaluate something I am interested in. 2. The original link is here "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_Closed" 3. My evaluation page is here "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LaurenZhou0509/Evaluate_an_Article"

Week 3/ Copyedit to the Article / LaurenZhou0509

This week I edited the article "Case Closed: The Fourteenth Target". I added the "Staff" section to the article since staff is a key factor to an introduction page of a film. I also added the lyrics to the theme song. As a new editor, I feel it is important to have a critical view of the article. To find out what is missing and what should be improved. Here is the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_Closed:_The_Fourteenth_Target Here is the difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Case_Closed:_The_Fourteenth_Target&diff=prev&oldid=983069897 — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaurenZhou0509 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4/ Add citation for the article / LaurenZhou0509

In this week's task, I add soundtrack info foe the article "Case Closed: The Fourteenth Target". The original article is missing the soundtrack information. I add a citation for this section. Here is the difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Case_Closed:_The_Fourteenth_Target&diff=prev&oldid=983072141

Week 5/ Add citation for the article / LaurenZhou0509

Same like last week, I choose another anime film work from Case Closed series, "Case Closed: The Last Wizard of the Century". I add a citation for the release result for the work. Here is the difference link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Case_Closed:_The_Last_Wizard_of_the_Century&diff=prev&oldid=983073287 — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaurenZhou0509 (talk • contribs) 02:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week2 / Evaluate A Article / Jooookerr

Hi professor, I have selected [Game Design] as my article to evaluate. I learned from this training how to correctly and effectively modify the content in Wikipedia, and also know what parts of the content need to be concerned with and understood according to the guideline. In video game design, I added several official corresponding links for professional words, corrected some spelling errors and sentence tenses, and also modified some sentence format to make the whole sentence easier to understand. The link to my evaluation is:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_design My edit version of the article link is:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Video_game_design&type=revision&diff=983073888&oldid=978118468 Jooookerr (talk) 02:45, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week4/Add a Citation to One Article/LBJJames

i added a used citation in the article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angels_with_Dirty_Faces&action=history i have learned how can i add citation for an article legally and how to use re-used reference in the article --LBJJames (talk) 03:24, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FULBERT&oldid=983078942"