Free Republic: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Shibumi2 (talk | contribs)
These edits were not discussed on Talk page. Please discuss on Talk page before making edits.
Shibumi2 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
[[Salon.com]]'s Jeff Stein observed in 1999 that: "[A] swelling number of haters have turned up the volume of death threats, gay-bashing, name-calling and conspiracy theories tying the father of Republican front-runner George W. Bush to drug-dealing by the CIA."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/07/13/free/print.html |title=Free for all at Free Republic |date=July 13, 1999 |publisher=Salon.com}}</ref> Robinson "famously blasted George W. Bush's presidential candidacy back in 2000, before a dramatic late-campaign about-face that saw him emerge as one of the GOP ticket's biggest supporters."<ref name="observer">[http://www.observer.com/2007/free-republic-purge-conservative-web-site-bans-giuliani-supporters]</ref> These shifts signalled internal battles comparable to the nomination controversies of 2007 "as its founder and chief administrator first cleansed commenting ranks of Bush supporters, then, later, rallied to his support."<ref name="observer"/>
[[Salon.com]]'s Jeff Stein observed in 1999 that: "[A] swelling number of haters have turned up the volume of death threats, gay-bashing, name-calling and conspiracy theories tying the father of Republican front-runner George W. Bush to drug-dealing by the CIA."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/07/13/free/print.html |title=Free for all at Free Republic |date=July 13, 1999 |publisher=Salon.com}}</ref> Robinson "famously blasted George W. Bush's presidential candidacy back in 2000, before a dramatic late-campaign about-face that saw him emerge as one of the GOP ticket's biggest supporters."<ref name="observer">[http://www.observer.com/2007/free-republic-purge-conservative-web-site-bans-giuliani-supporters]</ref> These shifts signalled internal battles comparable to the nomination controversies of 2007 "as its founder and chief administrator first cleansed commenting ranks of Bush supporters, then, later, rallied to his support."<ref name="observer"/>


{{rquote|left|'''''Leftists began to infiltrate the site, posting articles or posing as conservatives to act as agents provocateurs.'''''. &mdash; Sean Scallon in [[Chronicles (magazine)|Chronicles]] magazine, describing pre-2000 left-wing infiltration at Free Republic. <ref name="Scallon">Scallon, Sean. "[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/793011/posts?page=51,50 Letter from the Upper Midwest: Blizzard]" ''Chronicles,'' December 2002.</ref>}}
White House Press Secretary and former [[Fox News]] commentator [[Tony Snow]] was a registered member from April 23, 1998 until the day after the White House announced his consideration for the post of Press Secretary on April 23, 2006.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} Snow was not afraid to 'mix it up' with the Freepers who sometimes disagreed with his political philosophy and who called him a "pansy".<ref>[http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1067]</ref><ref>[http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/03/22/blue/index1.html]</ref>


White House Press Secretary and former [[Fox News]] commentator [[Tony Snow]] was a registered member from April 23, 1998 until the day after the White House announced his consideration for the post of Press Secretary on April 23, 2006.<ref>[http://www.archive.org/details/TonySnowonFreeRepublic.com]</ref><ref>[http://ancapistan.typepad.com/unfairwitness/2006/04/tony_snow_freep.html]</ref> When he accepted his position with the Bush administration his account was "purple screened" (suspended), and the account was un-suspended on September 14 when he resigned his post with the administration.<ref>[http://www.freerepublic.com/~tonysnow/]</ref> Snow was not afraid to 'mix it up' with the Freepers who sometimes disagreed with his political philosophy and who called him a "pansy".<ref>[http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1067]</ref><ref>[http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/03/22/blue/index1.html]</ref>
Free Republic had been criticized during the pre-moderation period for the actions of a few of its members. In 1999, after FReepers heard that Julie Hiatt Steele, the woman charged with obstruction of justice by Kenneth Starr during President Clinton's impeachment trial, was taking credit-card donations to help pay her legal bills, they flooded her Web site with fake donations. Hundreds of "donations" listing fake credit-card numbers (a form of wire fraud) ended up costing Steele around $4,000, since she had to pay her e-commerce service company 25 to 35 cents to process each one.<ref>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2003/01/30/frpng.DTL]</ref> Some threatened to assassinate former President [[Bill Clinton]], like this from February 2001: "If he keeps on he's going to make me come up there. There is only one solution to the Klintons, two 45 rounds and a nice little spot in Marcy Park." <ref>[http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/02/09/blue/index.html]</ref>.


Free Republic had been criticized during the pre-moderation period for the actions of a few of its members. In 1999, after FReepers heard that Julie Hiatt Steele, the woman charged with obstruction of justice by Kenneth Starr during President Clinton's impeachment trial, was taking credit-card donations to help pay her legal bills, they flooded her Web site with fake donations. Hundreds of "donations" listing fake credit-card numbers (a form of wire fraud) ended up costing Steele around $4,000, since she had to pay her e-commerce service company 25 to 35 cents to process each one.<ref>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2003/01/30/frpng.DTL]</ref> Some threatened to assassinate former President [[Bill Clinton]], like this from February 2001: "If he keeps on he's going to make me come up there. There is only one solution to the Klintons, two 45 rounds and a nice little spot in Marcy Park." <ref>[http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/02/09/blue/index.html]</ref>.
=== Jenna Bush and Clinton threat incident ===

When the bar manager of an Austin restaurant called [[911]] to notify authorities that an underage [[Jenna Bush]] had attempted to purchase liquor in June 2001, her personal information including her home address, date of birth, driver's license number and physical description was posted on FreeRepublic, along with calls for punitive action.<ref>[http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/06/06/blue/index.html]</ref>
=== 'Leftist ... agents provocateurs' ===

The Freepers have maintained that members of rival left-wing talkboards such as [[Democratic Underground]], and others who disagree with FR conservative politics, have frequently established accounts at Free Republic for inappropriate purposes.{{Fact|date=December 2007}} Such accounts are variously described as "disruptors" or "trolls." Often such an account is immediately banned by Free Republic moderators, since the first posts from the account are argumentative and critical of the prevailing Freeper beliefs.

Sean Scallon of ''Chronicles'' magazine referred to this phenomenon: "[Before moderation was introduced] Leftists began to infiltrate the site, posting articles or posing as conservatives to act as agents provocateurs."<ref>[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/793011/posts?page=51,50] Scallon, ''supra.''</ref>

In August 2000, a "self-described office liberal" at the South Carolina Department of Transportation was forced to resign after using a department computer to disrupt the Free Republic forum, and then send an e-mail to Robinson taunting him about it. <ref>http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39a525043cb8.htm</ref> A more recent, well-documented and well-publicized example of a liberal "agent provocateur" in action at Free Republic was the [[MD4Bush Incident]] (see below). Such disruptive activity is prohibited by Free Republic policy,<ref>http://www.freerepublic.com/help.htm#guidelines</ref> but incidents such as these are difficult to document.

However, other vandal accounts remain dormant, or are used to establish a usage pattern of bland or inoffensive posts, for months or even years. These are described as "sleeper" accounts. The Freepers claim that eventually, the vandal uses the account to post something offensive, such as a blatantly racist rant or violent threat, to deliberately damage the forum's reputation.[http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b6770b31f9d.htm]

When the bar manager of an Austin restaurant called [[911]] to notify authorities that an underage [[Jenna Bush]] had attempted to purchase liquor in June 2001, her personal information including her home address, date of birth, driver's license number and physical description was posted on FreeRepublic, along with calls for punitive action.<ref>[http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/06/06/blue/index.html]</ref> Some Freepers have claimed that the account allegedly used to post the manager's personal details, was such a "sleeper" account created by a left-wing vandal. [http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b6770b31f9d.htm]


The Clinton threat and some of the bar manager's personal information were removed by Robinson when brought to his attention, and the authors' posting privileges were revoked. He said that the site had had to "delete relatively few posts" over time for violations of its "no-violence" policy despite Free Republic's popularity and ease of registration.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/02/09/blue/index.html |title=A poster crosses the line on Free Republic forum |date=Feb. 9, 2001|publisher=Salon.com}}</ref>
The Clinton threat and some of the bar manager's personal information were removed by Robinson when brought to his attention, and the authors' posting privileges were revoked. He said that the site had had to "delete relatively few posts" over time for violations of its "no-violence" policy despite Free Republic's popularity and ease of registration.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/02/09/blue/index.html |title=A poster crosses the line on Free Republic forum |date=Feb. 9, 2001|publisher=Salon.com}}</ref>

Revision as of 17:56, 22 January 2008

Free Republic logo
Free Republic logo

Free Republic is a moderated Internet forum, activist and chat site for conservatives[citation needed], primarily within the United States. It presents articles and comments posted anonymously by registered members using screen names. Due to copyright restrictions (see below), posted articles are often excerpts from originals.[citation needed]

For each article, the forum's main page typically shows its headline, plus the first hundred words of the article as posted to Free Republic. Users can see the full article at its original source by clicking a hyperlink beneath the headline. Registered members post a continuous flow of new articles to the forum.[citation needed]

Local chapters and forum policies

There are local chapters "unconnected with Free Republic", organized through ping lists, e-mail, and Free Republic mail.[1][2] Some are only "ping list" groups, members who include their names in a list to be "pinged" on news articles of a certain nature. Some cover presidential events (daily picture, prayer, and speech threads), some focus on conservative principles such as the Second Amendment, the pro-life movement, or opposing gay marriage. The more active chapters organize live protests, which they call "Freeps." Since the 2000 election, these are often counter-protests, responses to protests by opposition groups [3][4], or small rallies[5].

Free Republic has an official policy which allows authorized moderators to remove postings identified as blatantly violent, racist or bigoted.[6][7]. Postings deemed to support "liberal" points of view may also be "moderated" per official policy, expressed in 2004 by the owner as: "we feel no compelling need to allow [liberals] a platform to promote their repugnant and obnoxious propaganda from our forum. Free Republic is not a liberal debating society."[8] The owner reserves the right to revoke posting privileges and exclude any individual without recourse.[citation needed]

Chronology

1996-2000 - Anti-Clinton

Founded in September 1996 as a sole proprietorship by Founder, Chairman and President James C. "Jim" Robinson[9] of Fresno, California, Free Republic opened to the general public in February, 1997. Robinson filed for LLC status on September 11, 1998.[10] It has always been a for-profit company and donations have never been tax exempt. [11]

Free Republic gained popularity during the Clinton impeachment controversy in 1997 and 1998, a time when it was linked on the Drudge Report as "Whitewater Archives," when protests and write-in campaigns were organized through the website. Many were also introduced to the site through an impeachment rally in Washington, attended by over 500 participants, called the "March for Justice," broadcast live on Halloween 1998 (a Saturday) by the C-SPAN channel. Featured speakers were Alan Keyes, Bob Barr, Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson of B.O.N.D. and Larry Klayman. Ann Coulter, Lucianne Goldberg and Matt Drudge also attended.[12] Other Free Republic events over the years have also been televised by C-SPAN.[13][14]

Drudge dropped the link to Free Republic by February, 1999, "because they were doing racist stuff over the [Clinton love child][15]." Drudge quickly restored the link, but later dropped it again for unknown reasons, and currently does not link.[citation needed]

In its early years, Free Republic generally allowed its members to post copyrighted news stories in entirety to its forum, regardless of whether permission had been granted by content owners, until the site was sued in 1998 by The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times for copyright infringement. The newspapers obtained a permanent injunction, although stipulated damages of $1 million were reduced to $10,000 during settlement negotiations which allowed the defendants to drop their appeal.[16] The case, often cited when arguing cyberlaw, is called L.A. Times v. Free Republic.

From 1996-2000, the bulletin board was virtually unmoderated.[citation needed] This policy was central to the website's Fair Use defense in the Copyright Infringement litigation, wherein it stated "(t)he website operated by the defendants, www.freerepublic.com, permits anyone who wishes to post news articles or other items and to post commentary about the article as well ... no censorship is made and all views are permitted."[17]

Salon.com's Jeff Stein observed in 1999 that: "[A] swelling number of haters have turned up the volume of death threats, gay-bashing, name-calling and conspiracy theories tying the father of Republican front-runner George W. Bush to drug-dealing by the CIA."[18] Robinson "famously blasted George W. Bush's presidential candidacy back in 2000, before a dramatic late-campaign about-face that saw him emerge as one of the GOP ticket's biggest supporters."[19] These shifts signalled internal battles comparable to the nomination controversies of 2007 "as its founder and chief administrator first cleansed commenting ranks of Bush supporters, then, later, rallied to his support."[19]

Leftists began to infiltrate the site, posting articles or posing as conservatives to act as agents provocateurs.. — Sean Scallon in Chronicles magazine, describing pre-2000 left-wing infiltration at Free Republic. [20]

White House Press Secretary and former Fox News commentator Tony Snow was a registered member from April 23, 1998 until the day after the White House announced his consideration for the post of Press Secretary on April 23, 2006.[21][22] When he accepted his position with the Bush administration his account was "purple screened" (suspended), and the account was un-suspended on September 14 when he resigned his post with the administration.[23] Snow was not afraid to 'mix it up' with the Freepers who sometimes disagreed with his political philosophy and who called him a "pansy".[24][25]

Free Republic had been criticized during the pre-moderation period for the actions of a few of its members. In 1999, after FReepers heard that Julie Hiatt Steele, the woman charged with obstruction of justice by Kenneth Starr during President Clinton's impeachment trial, was taking credit-card donations to help pay her legal bills, they flooded her Web site with fake donations. Hundreds of "donations" listing fake credit-card numbers (a form of wire fraud) ended up costing Steele around $4,000, since she had to pay her e-commerce service company 25 to 35 cents to process each one.[26] Some threatened to assassinate former President Bill Clinton, like this from February 2001: "If he keeps on he's going to make me come up there. There is only one solution to the Klintons, two 45 rounds and a nice little spot in Marcy Park." [27].

'Leftist ... agents provocateurs'

The Freepers have maintained that members of rival left-wing talkboards such as Democratic Underground, and others who disagree with FR conservative politics, have frequently established accounts at Free Republic for inappropriate purposes.[citation needed] Such accounts are variously described as "disruptors" or "trolls." Often such an account is immediately banned by Free Republic moderators, since the first posts from the account are argumentative and critical of the prevailing Freeper beliefs.

Sean Scallon of Chronicles magazine referred to this phenomenon: "[Before moderation was introduced] Leftists began to infiltrate the site, posting articles or posing as conservatives to act as agents provocateurs."[28]

In August 2000, a "self-described office liberal" at the South Carolina Department of Transportation was forced to resign after using a department computer to disrupt the Free Republic forum, and then send an e-mail to Robinson taunting him about it. [29] A more recent, well-documented and well-publicized example of a liberal "agent provocateur" in action at Free Republic was the MD4Bush Incident (see below). Such disruptive activity is prohibited by Free Republic policy,[30] but incidents such as these are difficult to document.

However, other vandal accounts remain dormant, or are used to establish a usage pattern of bland or inoffensive posts, for months or even years. These are described as "sleeper" accounts. The Freepers claim that eventually, the vandal uses the account to post something offensive, such as a blatantly racist rant or violent threat, to deliberately damage the forum's reputation.[38]

When the bar manager of an Austin restaurant called 911 to notify authorities that an underage Jenna Bush had attempted to purchase liquor in June 2001, her personal information including her home address, date of birth, driver's license number and physical description was posted on FreeRepublic, along with calls for punitive action.[31] Some Freepers have claimed that the account allegedly used to post the manager's personal details, was such a "sleeper" account created by a left-wing vandal. [39]

The Clinton threat and some of the bar manager's personal information were removed by Robinson when brought to his attention, and the authors' posting privileges were revoked. He said that the site had had to "delete relatively few posts" over time for violations of its "no-violence" policy despite Free Republic's popularity and ease of registration.[32] [33] The addition of round-the-clock moderation, coupled with changes in registration procedure, has largely secured the site from further internal threats. But In July 2007, conservative commentator Bill O'Reilly supported the idea that this phenomenon is still going on. In a segment talking about the objectionable material his staff had found, O'Reilly conceded: "But you're right, a lot of it's planted. And a lot of it is just crazy people who are surfing."[34]

2001-2003 - Bush's first term

In January 2001, the forum organized a "Free Republic Inaugural Gala and Count the Silverware Ball, with orchestral entertainment provided by the sitting governor of Arkansas (Gov. Mike Huckabee) and his band."[35] Among the attendees were James Golden (a.k.a., Bo Snerdly from Rush Limbaugh radio broadcasts, an early investor in Free Republic), and the Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson of B.O.N.D.[36]

Freepers counter-protest at an anti-war demonstration at Arlington National Cemetery on October 2, 2004.

At "the second annual Southeastern Rally, thrown by the South Carolina chapter of the Free Republic Network, the nascent organizing group that has spun off from no-holds-barred conservative Web site FreeRepublic.com" in 2001, [37] about fifty Freepers paid $220 a night to attend a conference at which conservative politicians such as South Carolina Secretary of State Jim Miles, and others spoke regarding issues such as the rights of man and the problems with the news media. Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris was announced to be attending to receive the same award the group had given Linda Tripp the previous year [38], but she did not attend. The evening concluded with a presentation, from the event's organizer and Chapter President, Julie Nicholson, of a Confederate flag flown from the South Carolina statehouse, to Bob Johnson, from Los Angeles, for spearheading the Free Republic Network.

Free Republic Network is currently moribund, its corporate status suspended[39].

2004 elections and Killian documents

During the 2004 U.S. Elections, Jerome Corsi, a Swift Boat Vet and co-author of the book Unfit for Command that attacked the Vietnam war record of Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, apologized in the national media for comments that he made on Free Republic under the user name "jrlc" "describing Muslims and Catholics as pedophiles and Pope John Paul II as senile."[40] The posts were never moderated and were discovered and publicized by Media Matters for America.[41].

Free Republic posters, notably "TankerKC" (later identified as active Air Force officer Paul Boley)[42] and "Buckhead" (later identified as Atlanta GOP lawyer Harry W. MacDougald)[43] contributed, along with members of the blogs Powerline and Little Green Footballs, to breaking what Freepers called "Memogate", the controversy surrounding CBS News' use of allegedly forged documents during the 2004 US presidential campaign.[44]

MacDougald may be the first Internet user to post assertions that the memos were forged. In a post[45] on Free Republic the night of the broadcast, he mentioned the memos' proportional spacing and made the claim that such printing was "not widespread until the mid to late 90's" [46]. His posting spurred discussion spread across the Internet via blogs (attributing Free Republic[citation needed]) and the Drudge Report[47] (attributing the Power Line blog, which credited "Buckhead" at Free Republic[48]). The Associated Press later picked it up.[49] Though the Investigative Panel "was not able to reach a definitive conclusion" on the documents' authenticity, the final conclusion of document expert Peter Tytell in Appendix 4 of the Panel's final report is noteworthy:

Tytell concluded ... that (i) the relevant portion of the Superscript Exemplar was produced on an Olympia manual typewriter, (ii) the Killian documents were not produced on an Olympia manual typewriter and (iii) the Killian documents were produced on a computer in Times New Roman typestyle[.] ... [T]he Killian documents were not produced on a typewriter in the early 1970s and therefore were not authentic.[50]

This resulted in the early retirement of Dan Rather, and the resignations of Mary Mapes and three other news division executives at CBS. According to Ivor Tossell of the Globe and Mail, Free Republic "was central to the network of websites that uncovered the forged memos about Bush's Vietnam service that appeared on CBS News and ultimately cost Dan Rather his job."[51]

MD4Bush Incident

In October 2004, the "MD4Bush" account was created to investigate the source of false rumors that Democratic Mayor of Baltimore Martin O'Malley had committed adultery.[citation needed] These rumors were suspected to be coming from the camp of Maryland Governor Robert Ehrlich.[citation needed] O'Malley was a likely (and eventual) opponent of Ehrlich in the 2006 gubernatorial race.[citation needed] Using this alias, MD4Bush allegedly lured Joseph Steffen, aide to Ehrlich, who had a Free Republic membership as "NCPAC," into contact.[citation needed] MD4Bush then allegedly brought up the O'Malley rumors, and baited Steffen into giving responses on the FR "private message" system, appearing to take credit for spreading the rumors.[citation needed]

Ehrlich fired Steffen when the contents of these messages were published in the Washington Post on February 9, 2005.[citation needed] "Kristinn Taylor, a spokesman for FreeRepublic.com, said [Maryland Democratic Party communications director] Ryan O'Doherty's Democratic Party address was one of at least three used to operate the identity of MD4BUSH."[52] Some Republicans and Freepers have charged that Post reporter Matthew Mosk's access to the MD4Bush account constitutes complicity to the alleged entrapment of Steffen, and a violation of the privacy of Free Republic users.[53] No legal remedy was sought by any of the parties.[citation needed]

2005-now - Bush's second term

It's scary how much power they do have. They can take down someone singlehandedly and I don't think Americans are aware of that.. — Natalie Maines of the Dixie Chicks, speaking about Free Republic. [54]

In January 2005, Free Republic organized an unofficial Inaugural Ball at the Washington Plaza Hotel to celebrate the reelection of President Bush and Vice President Richard Cheney and to honor the men and women serving in the United States Armed Forces. The event was promoted to feature then Arkansas Republican Governor Mike Huckabee and his rock and roll band called Capitol Offense.[55][56]

On August 19, 2005, a member of the D.C. Chapter of Free Republic participated in a counter-protest at Walter Reed Army Hospital in Washington in opposition to the antiwar group Code Pink. Walter Reed is home to many soldiers recuperating from serious injuries suffered in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.[57]

The band Dixie Chicks and lead singer Natalie Maines claim that Free Republic was instrumental in fueling a nationwide boycott of their music, which was organized by some former fans and radio stations after Maines made some anti-Bush comments in 2003. In their 2006 documentary Shut Up and Sing as well as in interviews, the Dixie Chicks have often mentioned Free Republic in reference to the boycott, which sharply reduced sales of their CDs and concert tickets.

Two dozen Freepers attend the March for Justice II rally at the Upper Senate Park on the U.S. Capitol grounds on Thursday, April 7, 2005.

Maines was quoted as saying: "It's scary how much power they do have. They can take down someone singlehandedly and I don't think Americans are aware of that."[54] Kristinn Taylor of Free Republic's dominant Washington D.C. chapter attended the screening of the documentary, hosted by the liberal advocacy group Center for American Progress. He was invited to join in a discussion after the screening and complimented the director on the film.[58][59][60][61][62]

Allegations of unfair treatment of Giuliani supporters

In 2007, moderators removed the posting privileges of many members who supported the presidential campaign of current Republican front-runner Rudy Giuliani. The New York Observer reported:

     Starting in April 2007 ... members sympathetic to the former mayor's candidacy claim to have suffered banishment from the site. They were victimized, they say, by a wave of purges designed to weed out any remaining support for the Giuliani campaign... [63]

Criticisms

On a July 2007 edition of the O'Reilly Factor, Bill O'Reilly interviewed Free Republic spokesman Kristinn Taylor. Bill O'Reilly remarked that the postings on the website were "vile" and "hateful", besmirching the Christian values of the Republican Party. O'Reilly said to Taylor that Free Republic had "some pretty sick people posting" and gave examples of racist and homophobic postings, as well as a post inciting the murder of Hillary Clinton. Taylor argued that it is only down to poor moderation that these posts exist. [64]

Influencing online polls

Media web sites, including newspapers, television networks, and America Online, run occasional "polls" that do not use the sampling methods of formal opinion polls, but instead invite all Internet users to respond. Some Free Republic forum messages, usually captioned "Freep this poll!", urge Free Republic members to vote en masse in these polls. Members are also urged to "'Freep' C-Span's 'Washington Journal' with telephone calls pointing out media bias."[65]

"Whenever a poll is posted on Free Republic.com, everybody goes and votes the right way, and there's nothing wrong with that," says Marinelle Thompson, Freeper and founder of gun rights group Second Amendment Sisters. "We just do it for a laugh. It doesn't really mean anything." The polls can also be manipulated, said Vlae Kershner, SF Gate News Director (and poll writer): "People are finding a way of getting around our system that only allows one vote, and they're voting hundreds of times. It's not thousands of people voting one way; it's one or two people voting hundreds of times."[66]

Occasionally, if the current results of an online poll are unfavorable to them, Freepers will "reverse freep" it, voting against their own views to pad the opposing vote to the point where it loses credibility. [67]

References

  1. ^ "Free Republic's Reply Memorandum." Los Angeles Times v. Free Republic. U.S. District Court, C.D.Cal., Case No. 98-7840. November 1, 1999.
  2. ^ Paragraph 55
  3. ^ [1]
  4. ^ [2]
  5. ^ [3]
  6. ^ Freerepublic.com - Registration Registration and User Agreement
  7. ^ Freerepublic.com Help (Guidelines)
  8. ^ [4]
  9. ^ Robinson, James C. Biographical Resume
  10. ^ California LP/LLC Search Number 199825410007 Free Republic LLC
  11. ^ MORROW, MARGARET M., J. Tentative Order CASE NO, CV 98-7840-MMM (AJWx) Los Angeles Times et. al vs. Free Republic et. al
  12. ^ Political Research Associates The Public Eye Spring 1999, Volume XIII, No. 1
  13. ^ [5], fetched 2006-12-30
  14. ^ York, Anthony April 2, 2001 [http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/04/02/blue/index.html Katherine Harris, woman of the year? ] Salon.com, fetched 2006-12-30
  15. ^ [6]
  16. ^ [7]
  17. ^ [8]
  18. ^ "Free for all at Free Republic". Salon.com. July 13, 1999.
  19. ^ a b [9]
  20. ^ Scallon, Sean. "Letter from the Upper Midwest: Blizzard" Chronicles, December 2002.
  21. ^ [10]
  22. ^ [11]
  23. ^ [12]
  24. ^ [13]
  25. ^ [14]
  26. ^ [15]
  27. ^ [16]
  28. ^ [17] Scallon, supra.
  29. ^ http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39a525043cb8.htm
  30. ^ http://www.freerepublic.com/help.htm#guidelines
  31. ^ [18]
  32. ^ "A poster crosses the line on Free Republic forum". Salon.com. Feb. 9, 2001. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  33. ^ "The jihad against Chuy's". Salon.com. June 6, 2001. Retrieved 2006-12-11.
  34. ^ http://mediamatters.org/items/200708010014 The O'Reilly Factor July 31, 2007
  35. ^ [19]
  36. ^ [20]
  37. ^ [21]
  38. ^ [22]
  39. ^ [23]
  40. ^ Anti-Kerry book author sorry for slurs USA Today. 8/10/2004
  41. ^ [24]
  42. ^ Pein, Corey. "Blog-Gate." Columbia Journalism Review, January/February 2005.
  43. ^ Wallsten, Peter. "Blogger alleging CBS memos as frauds is GOP lawyer." Los Angeles Times, 18 September 2004.
  44. ^ [25] Pein, supra.
  45. ^ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210662/replies?c=47
  46. ^ [26]
  47. ^ " '60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake." Drudge Report Archives. (Retrieved February 5, 2007.)
  48. ^ http://powerlineblog.com/archives/007760.php
  49. ^ Dobbs, Michael, and Allen, Mike. "Some Question Authenticity of Papers on Bush." The Washington Post, September 10, 2004.
  50. ^ http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/complete_report/CBS_Report.pdf
  51. ^ Tossell, Ivor. "Free Republic: glass ant farm for zealots" The Globe And Mail, 20 October 2006.
  52. ^ "Democrat's e-mail address tied to postings." Baltimore Sun, Dec. 16, 2005
  53. ^ Sprueill, Stephen. "Did the Washington Post Violate the Electronic Communications Privacy Act?" National Review Online, November 10, 2005.
  54. ^ a b Haysen, Kirsten. "Not Ready to Make Nice." Adelaide Now, October 7, 2006. Retrieved February 4, 2007. Cite error: The named reference "Haysen" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  55. ^ [27]
  56. ^ [28]
  57. ^ [29]
  58. ^ [30]
  59. ^ [31]
  60. ^ [32]
  61. ^ [33]
  62. ^ [34]
  63. ^ [35]
  64. ^ [36]Media Matters
  65. ^ [37]
  66. ^ "FReep This"
  67. ^ Langer, Gary (August 28, 2007). "Online Ballots: Let the Clicker Beware". ABC News. Retrieved 2007-08-30.

External links