Talk:Brain: Difference between revisions
→Number of neurons: new section |
→Number of neurons: reply |
||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
--[[User:Treetear|Treetear]] ([[User talk:Treetear|talk]]) 00:44, 31 July 2018 (UTC) |
--[[User:Treetear|Treetear]] ([[User talk:Treetear|talk]]) 00:44, 31 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
:If you would like to change the figure to 10-20 billion neurons and use that article as source, I would have no problem at all with that. [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 01:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:17, 31 July 2018
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brain article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Brain has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Name
hi everybody I am a newbie so I am sorry for any mistakes alternative name for brain
the brain or encephalon the same for wikipedia.org/human_brain cite http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/encephalon http://education.yahoo.com/reference/gray/subjects/subject/186 and many other sourses thnaks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zenhabit (talk • contribs) 22:02, April 3, 2013
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Brain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080807165804/http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Aboitiz/Referees/ to http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Aboitiz/Referees
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928024235/http://jerome.lettvin.info/lettvin/Jerome/WhatTheFrogsEyeTellsTheFrogsBrain.pdf to http://jerome.lettvin.info/lettvin/Jerome/WhatTheFrogsEyeTellsTheFrogsBrain.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://osiris.rutgers.edu/BuzsakiHP/Publications/PDFs/Buzsaki2004NatNeurosci.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Brain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714190157/http://www.columbia.edu/cu/biology/faculty/yuste/Publications/Yuste_Church_SciAm14.pdf to http://www.columbia.edu/cu/biology/faculty/yuste/Publications/Yuste_Church_SciAm14.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://flybrain.neurobio.arizona.edu/ - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081031120051/http://www.columbia.edu/cu/psychology/silver/publications2/149%20antle%20et%20al.pdf to http://www.columbia.edu/cu/psychology/silver/publications2/149%20antle%20et%20al.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050220094746/http://braininfo.rprc.washington.edu/ to http://braininfo.rprc.washington.edu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
differences between men and women
womens brain is in average 150 gramms lighter. isnt that worth to know in english wikipedia? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.113.99.117 (talk) 23:06, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Number of neurons
With this edit I contest the source to the statement on number of neurons in the lead section. Seems like the source has been added after the text, with no correction to the stated numbers.
But aren't there newer sources to access and use? For example, this one:
The search for true numbers of neurons and glial cells in the human brain: A review of 150 years of cell counting. (2016 Dec) PMID 27187682
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class neuroscience articles
- Top-importance neuroscience articles
- GA-Class Anatomy articles
- Top-importance Anatomy articles
- Anatomy articles about neuroanatomy
- WikiProject Anatomy articles
- GA-Class Animal anatomy articles
- Top-importance Animal anatomy articles
- WikiProject Animal anatomy articles