Talk:Chili Line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Synchronism (talk | contribs) at 17:16, 10 July 2018 (Synchronism moved page Talk:Chili line to Talk:Chili Line over redirect: Per sources, discussion ). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconUnited States: Colorado / New Mexico C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado.
To comment about this article, select the New section tab above.
For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico.
WikiProject iconTrains Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name change?

An editor recently changed the name, without discussion, from Chili Line to Chili line. When I lived there, I'd always seen the name capitalized (as are most named train lines). Three of the four references we cite give the name (in caps) as the Chili Line. So I think we need to discuss this proposal. My inclination would be to keep the original name: Chili Line. --Pete Tillman (talk) 03:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC), former area resident.[reply]

I agree. It is a proper noun, derived from a casual expression. A cursory check of the sources can support this idea. Synchronism (talk) 07:21, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to boldly revert the title change soon. The common name, being a name of a specific thing, is indisputably a proper noun. But, of course, if anyone out there wishes to discuss that then they have had ample opportunity to do so. Their lack of objection or defense of the assertion that this article's topic is an ordinary, common noun is noted. The consensus at present is to revert.Synchronism (talk) 14:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Imma pontificate upon this further. One could say that it is a proper name as opposed to a noun, in a strict (somewhat pedantic?) sense. Nonetheless, it is the name used by reliable sources. And it is a bit jarring to my eyes personally (and I am no fan of extraneous punctuation). I think this would be analogous to changing Silk Road to Silk road, and the attendant ambiguities associated with that are similar to this case.Synchronism (talk) 17:08, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]