Talk:SARS-CoV-2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
SKYFALL Researches corrections an extension Stéphane Schmutz 30.12.20321
Line 29: Line 29:
{{Press
{{Press
| collapsed = yes
| collapsed = yes

| author = Omer Benjakob
| author = Omer Benjakob
| title = On Wikipedia, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation
| title = On Wikipedia, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation
Line 36: Line 36:
| date = 9 February 2020
| date = 9 February 2020
| quote = ... the article about the '2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak' was created on January 5, 2020. Four days later, a new article was spun off from it, dedicated solely to the 'Novel coronavirus' – officially known as 2019-nCoV. Yet another was created in February to detail the symptoms of the respiratory disease caused by the virus.
| quote = ... the article about the '2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak' was created on January 5, 2020. Four days later, a new article was spun off from it, dedicated solely to the 'Novel coronavirus' – officially known as 2019-nCoV. Yet another was created in February to detail the symptoms of the respiratory disease caused by the virus.
| archiveurl =
| archiveurl =
| archivedate =
| archivedate =
| accessdate = 9 February 2020
| accessdate = 9 February 2020


Line 46: Line 46:
| date2 = 24 March 2020
| date2 = 24 March 2020
| quote2 = Those pages include the Wikipedia article for the virus itself, known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, the disease it causes, COVID-19, and the ongoing global pandemic the coronavirus has caused.
| quote2 = Those pages include the Wikipedia article for the virus itself, known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, the disease it causes, COVID-19, and the ongoing global pandemic the coronavirus has caused.
| archiveurl2 =
| archiveurl2 =
| archivedate2 =
| archivedate2 =
| accessdate2 = 31 March 2020
| accessdate2 = 31 March 2020


| author3 = Omer Benjakob
| author3 = Omer Benjakob
| title3 = Why Wikipedia Is Immune to Coronavirus
| title3 = Why Wikipedia Is Immune to Coronavirus
| org3 = [[Haaretz]]
| org3 = [[Haaretz]]
| url3 = https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-why-wikipedia-is-immune-to-coronavirus-1.8751147
| url3 = https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-why-wikipedia-is-immune-to-coronavirus-1.8751147
| date3 = 8 April 2020
| date3 = 8 April 2020
| quote3 = Asked by Haaretz to gauge the merits of the English-language article on the virus, Prof. Nadav Davidovitch, who heads the department of public health at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, said he was 'pleasantly surprised by its quality.'
| quote3 = Asked by Haaretz to gauge the merits of the English-language article on the virus, Prof. Nadav Davidovitch, who heads the department of public health at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, said he was 'pleasantly surprised by its quality.'
| archiveurl3 =
| archiveurl3 =
| archivedate3 =
| archivedate3 =
| accessdate3 = 10 April 2020
| accessdate3 = 10 April 2020
}}
}}
Line 87: Line 87:
| maxarchivesize=200K
| maxarchivesize=200K
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadsleft=4
| minthreadsleft=5
| minthreadstoarchive=2
| minthreadstoarchive=2
}}
}}
{{section sizes}}

__TOC__


==Highlighted open discussions==
<!-- START PIN -->{{Pin message}}<!-- [[User:DoNotArchiveUntil]] 20:29, 6 April 2030 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1901737788}}<!-- END PIN -->
{{/Current consensus}}
{{/Current consensus}}
An A bomb against SARS-CoV-2 scientist Stéphane Schmutz Foundation for the Universal Knowledge 4.9.2021 Oparine Haldane Stanley Miller Preis explained: As the first pieces of life appear in the water of the emerging Earth; we think that water can protect life and eradicate COVID-19.
extension: MASTER ALARM OFF Jack Swigert Apollo 13 Explaination: In the prebiotic history water protect Life at its origins, so I think water can protect life nowadays against SARS-CoV-2. It is comfirmed by the hisory of the apparition of RNA in the prebiotic history. (SKYFALL COVID-19 Researches ("TOP SECRET") Stéphane Schmutz 30.12.2021)
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 August 2021 ==


{{edit extended-protected|Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2|answered=yes}}
== Epidemiological tracing of early cases ==
Please add Template:Outdated to the "Infection and transmission" section. It reports only 2020 information. The idea of aerosol transmission is presented as not-yet-confirmed. There are 47 citations before the start of the "Reinfection" subsection: 1 dates from 2010, 41 date from 2020, and just 5 date from 2021. And of those 5, 2 are a case study of a specific person, 1 talks about animals that can get infected, and 2 talk about particles emitted during talking. Most or all items in this section should be relying on 2021 data, because the science is getting updated so fast through extensive research. [[Special:Contributions/174.206.39.24|174.206.39.24]] ([[User talk:174.206.39.24|talk]]) 11:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
:{{done}}. will do, but I will also say that these statements probably need better [[WP:MEDRS]], as "etiology" is explicitly covered under [[WP:BMI]]. To be plain, the statements may require a higher level of sourcing commiserate with scientific journal review articles published in topic-relevant venues. We may not be able to move as fast as the science does as a result. Of course this also means some of these sentences are definitely poorly sourced as it is, even the ones from the past. Appreciate you pointing this out, thank you.--[[User:Shibbolethink|<span style="color: black">Shibboleth</span><span style="color: maroon">ink</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shibbolethink|♔]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink|♕]])</sup> 15:55, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
here are some links to find high quality MEDRS about this topic (SARS-CoV-2 transmission):
{{Find medrs|SARS-CoV-2 transmission}}
--[[User:Shibbolethink|<span style="color: black">Shibboleth</span><span style="color: maroon">ink</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shibbolethink|♔]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink|♕]])</sup> 23:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


== Typo "Demark" ==
Time for a major rewrite of this section: {{talk quote|The first known infections from SARS‑CoV‑2 were discovered in Wuhan, China. The original source of viral transmission to humans remains unclear, as does whether the virus became pathogenic before or after the spillover event. Because many of the early infectees were workers at the Huanan Seafood Market, it has been suggested that the virus might have originated from the market. However, other research indicates that visitors may have introduced the virus to the market, which then facilitated rapid expansion of the infections. A March 2021 WHO-convened report stated that human spillover via an intermediate animal host was the most likely explanation, with direct spillover from bats next most likely. Introduction through the food supply chain and the Huanan Seafood Market was considered another possible, but less likely, explanation. An analysis in December 2021, however, said that the index case had been misidentified and that the preponderance of early cases linked to the Huanan Market, specifically a section where raccoon dogs were caged, argued for it being the source.}}


I'm sorry, if I'm using the talk page the wrong way, but since the article is protected and I couldn't make the edit myself, I would appreciate it, if an experienced member could just fix this little typo.
Major points of improvement:


It's really self-explanatory, there's just a missing "n" in "Demark" that needs to be added. It's in the last sentence of the paragraph in chapter 4.1.1 (Phylogenetics -> Variants).
# There are two "however" that redirect the reader in confusing directions.
# The text messes information of the place of origin (i.e. wuhan market) with the pathway of transmission (direct spillover vs intermediate spillover vs food supply chain vs unmentioned lab leak)
# "The first known infections from SARS-CoV-2 were discovered in Wuhan, China" is too vague, given that [https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/18/health/covid-wuhan-market-lab-leak.html we have this from the NYTimes], for example, "Toward the end of December 2019, doctors at several Wuhan hospitals noticed mysterious cases of pneumonia arising in people who worked at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, a dank and poorly ventilated space where seafood, poultry, meat and wild animals were sold." It gives more specific locations than ours (wuhan hospitals vs wuhan the city), and expands on key characteristics of the market (e.g. dank place where wild animals were sold).
# Our paraphrase of Worobey's results ("An analysis in December 2021, however, said that the index case had been misidentified and that the preponderance of early cases linked to the Huanan Market, specifically a section where raccoon dogs were caged, argued for it being the source.") is too strong, in my opinion. I propose we moderate it to something like this: {{talk quote|Michael Worobey, an expert on the origins of influenza and H.I.V., has traced the epidemiological origin of the early cases in Wuhan, suggesting that the index case (i.e. the first known case) was a vendor at the Huanan Seafood Market, which contrast with other public accounts that register as the index case an accountant who lived many miles from it.}} [[User:Forich|Forich]] ([[User talk:Forich|talk]]) 03:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
:::I agree with 1 and 2. A rewording for clarity is deserved, now that things are a bit more settled and there's less edit warring in general dividing our attention. For 3, I think I'd prefer to word it as "first confirmed infections", rather than replacing it with speculation about "mysterious cases of pneumonia" especially if paired with "dank and poorly ventilated" that I'd consider [[WP:WTW]] (particularly 'dank'). Along with 4, I'd suggest splitting the paragraph into things we know (first confirmed cases, Huanan Seafood Market being early epicenter) and the major areas of investigation (spillover event at seafood market, unidentified pneumonia, etc) to help clarify the certainty. [[User:Bakkster Man|Bakkster Man]] ([[User talk:Bakkster Man|talk]]) 14:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
:::Would there also be any relevance in including this [https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/12/01/940395651/coronavirus-was-in-u-s-weeks-earlier-than-previously-known-study-says NPR report] somewhere in this section? It concerns findings of coronavirus antibodies in American blood samples from December 2019, and [https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1785 here] is the DOI. Would it be extraneous to discuss the possible spread of the disease prior to the Wuhan outbreak? Wuhan is a well-documented outbreak and there are no other similar candidates at that time, but mentioning these findings in the rewrite may better reflect how there are several other unknown factors around the origins. [[User:Mewnst|Mewnst]] ([[User talk:Mewnst|talk]]) 10:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}


Thank you very much!
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 December 2021 ==


[[User:XLix|XLix]] ([[User talk:XLix|talk]]) 22:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
{{edit extended-protected|Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2|answered=yes}}
:{{fixed}}. thanks--[[User:Shibbolethink|<span style="color: black">Shibboleth</span><span style="color: maroon">ink</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shibbolethink|♔]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink|♕]])</sup> 22:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/179.63.194.218|179.63.194.218]] ([[User talk:179.63.194.218|talk]]) 17:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
i.want.to.edit.it
:[[File:Full-protection-shackle-no-text.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection]] if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request.<!-- Template:EEp --> [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 17:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)


== Higher mortality risk for COVID survivors? ==
== Featured picture scheduled for POTD ==


Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture [[:File:Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.jpg]], which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Picture of the day|picture of the day]] (POTD) for September 3, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at [[Template:POTD/2021-09-03]]. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the [[Main Page]]. If you have any concerns, please place a message at [[Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day]]. Thank you! [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:45, 20 August 2021 (UTC) <!-- Template:UpcomingPOTD -->
NEWS (3 December 2021): Apparently - there's a significantly *higher mortality risk* for COVID survivors after 1-year of onset.<ref name="MNT-20211203">{{cite news |last=Flynn |first=Hannah |title=COVID-19 survivors have an increased risk of death 12 months post infection |url=https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/covid-19-survivors-have-an-increased-risk-of-death-12-months-post-infection |date=3 December 2021 |work=[[Medical News Today]] |accessdate=3 December 2021 }}</ref><ref name=FIM2-2112-1">{{cite journal |author=Mainous III, Arch G. |display-authors=et al. |title=COVID-19 Post-acute Sequelae Among Adults: 12 Month Mortality Risk |url=https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.778434/full |date=1 December 2021 |journal=[[Frontiers in Medicine]] |volume=8 |issue=778434 |doi=10.3389/fmed.2021.778434 |accessdate=3 December 2021 }}</ref> - QUESTION: Worth considering for the main article? - in any case - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - [[User:Drbogdan|Drbogdan]] ([[User talk:Drbogdan|talk]]) 18:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
<div style="margin-top:4px; border:1px solid #ddcef2; background:#faf5ff; overflow:auto;"><div style="margin:0.6em 0.4em 0.1em;">{{POTD/Day|2021-09-03|excludeheader=yes}}</div></div>
{{reflist-talk}}
:Any [[WP:MEDRS]]? [[User:Alexbrn|Alexbrn]] ([[User talk:Alexbrn|talk]]) 18:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


The first paragraph in the Epidemiology section is a near-duplicate to the previous paragraph (in the previous section). I believe it should be removed.
== Merging various Wikipedia Articles related to SARS-CoV-2 ==


== Typo in "Epidemiology" section ==
Requesting merging of the various articles on Wikipedia related to the virus to be merged here - e.g., various variants ([[SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant]], [[SARS-CoV-2 Beta variant]], [[SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant]], [[SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant]], [[SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant]]) to come under "[[Severe_acute_respiratory_syndrome_coronavirus_2#Variants|variants]]" to better integrate all information at one place. [[User:Viv73|Viv73]] ([[User talk:Viv73|talk]]) 09:04, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


The "epidemiology" section start with "xVery few drugs" (erroneous "x")
==RfC at [[Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory]]==
[[User:Technicolour-dreamboat|Technicolour-dreamboat]] ([[User talk:Technicolour-dreamboat|talk]]) 12:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Editors are invited to participate in this RfC:<br/> [[Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory|RfC about how we should use the Frutos source]] [[User:Adoring nanny|Adoring nanny]] ([[User talk:Adoring nanny|talk]]) 16:53, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
:{{done}}. Thanks for the heads up.—&nbsp;[[User:Shibbolethink|<span style="color: black">Shibboleth</span><span style="color: maroon">ink</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shibbolethink|♔]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink|♕]])</sup> 18:55, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

== Global Viral Mass ==

AFAIK there have been no estimations of the global viral mass of SARS‑CoV‑2, or the mass of a single virion for that matter. What are we dealing with here, a few kilos or what? [[User:Kencf0618|kencf0618]] ([[User talk:Kencf0618|talk]]) 03:39, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
:There is [https://www.pnas.org/content/118/25/e2024815118 this estimation], but I'm unsure how relevant and meaningful the estimate is for the article. [[User:Bakkster Man|Bakkster Man]] ([[User talk:Bakkster Man|talk]]) 14:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 September 2021 ==

{{edit extended-protected|Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2|answered=yes}}
In the lead, replace [[Virus]] with [[Emergent virus]]. [[Special:Contributions/79.70.190.198|79.70.190.198]] ([[User talk:79.70.190.198|talk]]) 08:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:''' please establish a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for this alteration '''[[Wikipedia:Edit requests|before]]''' using the {{tlx|edit extended-protected}} template.<!-- Template:EEp --> I think it's better to link to the actual virus article. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 13:35, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:58, 30 December 2021

Highlighted open discussions

Current page-specific consensus

NOTE: The following is a list of material maintained on grounds that it represents current consensus for the articles under the scope of this project. In accordance with Wikipedia:General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019, ("prohibitions on the addition or removal of certain content except when consensus for the edit exists") changes of the material listed below in this article must be discussed first, and repeated offenses against established consensus may result in administrative action. It is recommended to link to this list in your edit summary when reverting, as [[Talk:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2#Current consensus]], item [n]. To ensure you are viewing the current list, you may wish to purge this page.

1. There is consensus that the terms "Wuhan virus" or "China virus" should not be used in the Lead of the article. The terms and their history can be discussed in the body of the article. Discussion permalink

An A bomb against SARS-CoV-2 scientist Stéphane Schmutz Foundation for the Universal Knowledge 4.9.2021 Oparine Haldane Stanley Miller Preis explained: As the first pieces of life appear in the water of the emerging Earth; we think that water can protect life and eradicate COVID-19. extension: MASTER ALARM OFF Jack Swigert Apollo 13 Explaination: In the prebiotic history water protect Life at its origins, so I think water can protect life nowadays against SARS-CoV-2. It is comfirmed by the hisory of the apparition of RNA in the prebiotic history. (SKYFALL COVID-19 Researches ("TOP SECRET") Stéphane Schmutz 30.12.2021)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 August 2021

Please add Template:Outdated to the "Infection and transmission" section. It reports only 2020 information. The idea of aerosol transmission is presented as not-yet-confirmed. There are 47 citations before the start of the "Reinfection" subsection: 1 dates from 2010, 41 date from 2020, and just 5 date from 2021. And of those 5, 2 are a case study of a specific person, 1 talks about animals that can get infected, and 2 talk about particles emitted during talking. Most or all items in this section should be relying on 2021 data, because the science is getting updated so fast through extensive research. 174.206.39.24 (talk) 11:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. will do, but I will also say that these statements probably need better WP:MEDRS, as "etiology" is explicitly covered under WP:BMI. To be plain, the statements may require a higher level of sourcing commiserate with scientific journal review articles published in topic-relevant venues. We may not be able to move as fast as the science does as a result. Of course this also means some of these sentences are definitely poorly sourced as it is, even the ones from the past. Appreciate you pointing this out, thank you.--Shibbolethink ( ) 15:55, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

here are some links to find high quality MEDRS about this topic (SARS-CoV-2 transmission): Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL --Shibbolethink ( ) 23:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Typo "Demark"

I'm sorry, if I'm using the talk page the wrong way, but since the article is protected and I couldn't make the edit myself, I would appreciate it, if an experienced member could just fix this little typo.

It's really self-explanatory, there's just a missing "n" in "Demark" that needs to be added. It's in the last sentence of the paragraph in chapter 4.1.1 (Phylogenetics -> Variants).

Thank you very much!

XLix (talk) 22:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed. thanks--Shibbolethink ( ) 22:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture File:Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 3, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-09-03. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:45, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2) is the virus that causes COVID-19, the respiratory illness responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. Like other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 has four structural proteins, known by the letters S (spike), E (envelope), M (membrane), and N (nucleocapsid); the N protein holds the RNA genome, and the S, E, and M proteins together create the viral envelope. This colourised transmission electron micrograph shows SARS-CoV-2 virus particles emerging from the surface of cells cultured in a laboratory. The crown-like spikes on the outer edge of the virus particles give coronaviruses their name, derived from Latin corona, 'crown'.

Photograph credit: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories

The first paragraph in the Epidemiology section is a near-duplicate to the previous paragraph (in the previous section). I believe it should be removed.

Typo in "Epidemiology" section

The "epidemiology" section start with "xVery few drugs" (erroneous "x") Technicolour-dreamboat (talk) 12:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Thanks for the heads up.— Shibbolethink ( ) 18:55, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global Viral Mass

AFAIK there have been no estimations of the global viral mass of SARS‑CoV‑2, or the mass of a single virion for that matter. What are we dealing with here, a few kilos or what? kencf0618 (talk) 03:39, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is this estimation, but I'm unsure how relevant and meaningful the estimate is for the article. Bakkster Man (talk) 14:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 September 2021

In the lead, replace Virus with Emergent virus. 79.70.190.198 (talk) 08:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit extended-protected}} template. I think it's better to link to the actual virus article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:35, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]