User talk:Jayen466

Wikipedia ads file info – show another – #3 RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report No RfXs since 12:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online Arbitration Committee proceedings recent changes purge this page view or discuss this template Case requests Request name Motions Initiated Votes Persistent WP:IDONTLIKEIT behavior in WP:NCROY discussions   10 May 2024 0/4/0 [edit] Open cases Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due Venezuelan politics (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 20 Apr 2024 04 May 2024 [edit] Recently closed cases (Past cases) Case name Closed Conflict of interest management 13 Apr 2024 Mzajac 7 May 2024 Clarification and Amendment requests Request name Motions  Case Posted Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing none (orig. case) 30 April 2024 Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 4 none (orig. case) 13 May 2024 Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation none (orig. case) 13 May 2024 Arbitrator motions No arbitrator motions are currently open. Click this button. Reference this BLP. 'Click to see' image-toggling for taboo images Can you do me a favour? Please see the image toggling idea in Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Muhammad_images#A_few_bullet_points_from_the_discussion_area, and give me your word on my suggestion? Anthonyhcole suggested contacting you on my talk. I'd like to make it a bit clearer for you here, but I've over-spent my time of WP tonight and will be busy over the next couple of days. I've been meaning to ask you this but got a bit distracted, and at some point possibly-soon the closing admin on the Muhammad debate will post their report. If it's a goer I'll stay focused and spend as much time on it as it needs. I've become aware that there's a religion MOS too. Regards, Matt Lewis (talk) 21:50, 2 May 2012 (UTC) Sorry for the delay. Have commented in the discussion on your talk. Best, --JN466 03:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC) COI edits this and that are interesting. 64.40.54.234 (talk) 21:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC) Thanks. JN466 03:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 07 May 2012 Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013 In the news: What does Wikipedia call an expert; and untruths in biographies ... again. WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood? Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 00:45, 8 May 2012 (UTC) You have been mentioned You have been mentioned on the TM research talk page per a change made to the content of the article should you wish to comment. By implication you have also been described as a member of the "Fairfield Cabal" here [1].(olive (talk) 19:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC)) Thanks Olive, I will have a look, and perhaps try another rewrite. It may be a day or two before I get round to really sitting down to it. (In the meantime, I will consider my induction into the Fairfield Cabal as a mark of honour!) Best, --JN466 19:57, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Thanks for whatever you have time for. We need all the "outside" eyes on those pages we can get seems to me.(olive (talk) 14:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)) FYI Hello Jayen, I'm writing re: some edits made by you to the TM Research article which were reverted yesterday by Fladrif. I think that your version was more accurate than Fladrif's, and I have posted a response to his edit on the talk page of that article. Best wishes EMP (talk) 18:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC) Your perspective would be of value Hi there. I would appreciate it if you could visit Talk:Muhammad. The article, Muhammad, has changed significantly since it originally passed WP:GA several years ago. It now states in the opening paragraph that Mohammad is the Founder of Islam and has relegated to a note at the end of the article that Muslims, themselves don't believe this. I have started a discussion on the talk page concerning this and would value your input. Thanks so much. Veritycheck (talk) 00:59, 11 May 2012 (UTC) Topic ban violation notification Please note that under the ARBSCI sanctions you are not supposed to be commenting on my appeal (see remedy 3A). I've raised this at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee#Request for clarification: Jayen466 involvement in my ARBSCI appeal. I suggest that you remove your comments from the amendment case, as they are quite blatantly in violation of your sanctions. I'm not looking for you to be sanctioned for this violation, as you've probably forgotten about remedy 3A, but it's very inappropriate for you as a topic-banned editor to be commenting on another sanctioned editor's appeal. Prioryman (talk) 01:32, 14 May 2012 (UTC)