User talk:Mannanan51

Kingston, NY - tide-ware

Your revision to Kingston, NY: Revision as of 03:40, 29 September 2015 included a reference to the city becoming a "tide-ware coal terminal". I am unable to find other references to this online, and wonder about your source, and what "tide-ware coal" might be. 72.76.101.209 (talk)

Replied on your Talk page. Mannanan51 (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC) (GOT IT, THANKS!)

IPs editing Popes

Mannanan51, the IPs editing Popes may go further back than we realize.

Please check out:

• 49.147.191.157
• 49.147.183.110
• 119.93.41.213 --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

There are at least two more apart from the two I listed above. All seem to located in the Phillipines, all making a series of entries at the end of last month. See "Mass changes to pope articles by new user" on Catholicism Talk page. I don't think they're getting this from Miranda. Mannanan51 (talk) 04:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Judging from the edits of Job Labasan, I believe this editor is the IP. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Take a look at Pope Anastasius II. Three dubious edits by three different users. Starting with Pope Callixtus I, one Job Labasan has begun to re-enter those edits previously reverted (more than once). Mannanan51 (talk) 19:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your edits and expansion of Saint Chrodegang! Sıgehelmus (Talk) |д=) 17:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Bosseron Chambers has been accepted

Charles Bosseron Chambers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MadeYourReadThis (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

International Knights

You are correct that the article is very US-centric. I think the Canadian and Mexican councils are pretty well established, but with one or two historical anomalies all of the councils outside North America are recent establishments. This isn't to say they should be covered--they should--just that there are going to be far fewer sources on them... and I don't speak Polish, etc. --BrianCUA (talk) 21:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Brychan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You changed the text sourced to Koch so that it no longer reflected the source. Please don't do this again. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 12:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Mannanan51. You have new messages at Doug Weller's talk page.
Message added 16:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Doug Weller talk 16:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Your addition to New York Foundling has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. /wiae /tlk 15:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

de Capillas

I've undone your merge pending further discussion. I think the merge should go the other way, since that article has a lot more history. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:46, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Beacon firehouse

Well, the building I took the picture of is the one at the address listed on the Register.

But it might be helpful if we can pull up the nomination form and see ... Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Massacre of the Innocents

Would you like to have a look at my changes to Massacre of the Innocents? I've tried to make it readable, balanced, and not too long. PiCo (talk) 12:39, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Some observations:

• I could not find where the lengthy discussion in the lede summarizes anything in the text; maybe it should be moved down to a prefatory Background section.
• Reference to Thomas Paine doesn't seem to add anything since he wasn't an historian, biblical scholar nor theologian; not sure his opinion is any more valid than that of Galileo, if indeed he had one.
• "Those who deny that the inspiration of the story is theological rather than historical point" - are these necessarily mutually exclusive?
• "(No explanation has been offered for why it should be absent from Luke's gospel, or why Mark and John have no infancy narrative whatsoever)." Don't know that any explanation is required. Different writers at different times with different sources for different audiences; variations between Matthew and Luke are discussed somewhat in the "Nativity of Jesus" article.
• Perhaps some of the images in the gallery could be moved to the appropriate paragraph in the Arts section where applicable. Not sure why the link to Commons was deleted, as it appears that is sometimes recommended in preference to galleries.

Appreciate the time you've put into this, it shows. (I will look for some needed citations tagged in the Arts section.) Mannanan51 (talk) 15:37, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

I've tried to take all your comments into account - thanks for the time. The gallery and the commons link: I happen to like galleries, as Christian art is, in my opinion, quite beautiful. About the commons link, I have no idea what happened - I don't think I intenmtionally reloved it - if you want to restore it, feel free. :) PiCo (talk) 10:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Theodorus and Theophanes

Please start a proper proposal discussion, & I will comment. Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 00:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Jones (martyr), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Slade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lupus of Troyes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Whistle

Hey, thanks! That was on my long-list of things I never quite got around to doing Nzd (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Regarding your recent edit to Louis-François Duplessis de Mornay

See here. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 23:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

That's the 1911 Catholic Encyclopedia, which is my understanding is in the public domain -as was duly noted in the citation. If this is incorrect, please advise. Mannanan51 (talk) 00:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

I'm not sure. I've spent 6 minutes looking and I can't find something explicitly stating the licensing of the websites' contents. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 00:15, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

n.b.

• "This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1924. It may be copyrighted outside the U.S. (see Help:Public domain)". -from Wikisource.
• (See also: Catholic Encyclopedia#Online versions).
• "Knight chose the 1913 15-volume set because the later editions are still under copyright protection. Not only is the 1913 version in the public domain, but it is also thought by many to be the superior version."[1] -from the New Advent website. Mannanan51 (talk) 00:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

I see. That works. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 10:19, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Catholic Encyclopedia

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Catholic Encyclopedia, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

• I didn't make it up, I copied it from somewhere. See: "Category:Contributors to the Catholic Encyclopedia"; but I believe I saw a different page with more names listed, which is why I deleted the section in the article that I started on contributors. Mannanan51 (talk) 01:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

The Queen of Sheba visits King Solomon

I've edit all information that I could found about that painting. Please, can you control if this page could be good? Thank you. --82.56.171.191 (talk) 16:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Philip II of Spain is depicted as King Solomon, Mary I of England as the Queen of Sheba, and Viglius van Aytta as a king's soldier. Then even the other king and queen's retinue could be depicted as Philip and Mary's related characters. Can you find if there are sources about it and their attires? Thank you! --79.44.235.74 (talk) 10:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Cave of Saint Blaise you included material copied from Veles (god). That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying within Wikipedia in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)