User talk:Mikedelsol

Stephen Harper

I removed "The Right Honourable" as per item #2 at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)#Honorific prefixes. It's not because I am against the man but he will not always be PM and therefore not always Rt. Hon. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 22:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

You're right he will always be Rt. Hon. I found that later and should have know better. Which of course means that Kim Campbell is also Rt. Hon. for life. I've had to change it three times now but I think I'm being pedantic. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Roy Jenkins in the other club

Do you have a reference for Roy Jenkins in The Other Club? Please put one in if you do, as I think he doesn't appear in Colville's book (the sole present reference). -- Kevin Ryde 23:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Mariano Rumor Laureen Harper Viscount Hailsham Chicago school (economics) Leon Kass List of Conservative Party politicians Rhetoric (Aristotle) Rachel Pollack Robert Wright (politician) Charles Morris (politician) Andy Mitchell Joseph Morris Lewis Stevenson Cosmopolitan Party of Canada Eastman Kodak William-Henry Gauvin Workers' Communist Party of Canada Aurora, Ontario Lawrence Cannon

Cleanup Stalag Luft VII-A National Democratic Institute for International Affairs Ruth Barcan Marcus Merge Plurality Military history of Canada during World War II List of United States Senators from Maryland Add Sources Medicare (Canada) Kerry Kennedy Tory Wikify On the Soul Parliamentary Debate Newton N. Minow Expand Eureka College Common Sense Revolution Pedro Santana

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Pro wrestling promotions timeline

How did I do it? Well... to be honest, I just copied timeline code from some other article and messed with it to make the one for the pro wrestling promotions. I had no clue how to make it, I just copied the code. Thanks for the praise as well, it's nice that someone commends me for a change. -- FPAtl (holla, holla, holla) 15:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

United States Department of the Air Force

Hi -

Regarding your edit summary for you edit of this article, needs its own article, doesn't it?, I believe the answer is no, that the United States Air Force (to which the article redirects; I've put that back) are in fact one and the same thing. I'm certainly open to any facts showing that they are different organizations, but I believe there are one and the same, based on the facts in the (stub) article that I replaced with a redirect (e.g., same logo, same legislation creating them, same office in charge - Secretary of the Air Force).

If you do find some evidence that the two organizations being separate, please post it one or both talk pages. Also, if you do that, I strongly recommend that you revert the USDAF article to an earlier version of that article: although it was a stub, there was much more information in the previous version than what you just wrote. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 00:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your response on the USAF-USDAF issue. Unfortunately, your main argument - that there are separate articles for United States Department of the Army and United States Army is unpersuasive. If you look at the first of these two, it is a stub, and the seals shown in the two articles are identical.

I look forward to continuing this discussion, and hopefully to some evidence that something else besides the USAF "reports" to the USDAF. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 01:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I suppose I'm coming across as difficult here; if so, I apologize. I read the The U.S. Air Force was also created, along with a new Department of the Air Force." to mean The U.S. Army Air Forces were completely separated from the U.S. Army, and the separation included creating a department-level organization equal to that of the Army to run the Air Force.

To be more constructive: I'd settle for something (anything) that says "The USAF, as well as X, Y, and Z, are components of the Department of the Air Force", or "Position X, which heads the USAF, reports to the Secretary of the Air Force". Or an organization chart which shows the USAF and the USDAF as separate things. I hope that isn't seen as excessive. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 01:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

The above has been copied to Talk:United States Air Force (my mistake for not starting the discussion there); further discussion is invited at that page. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 03:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Obama article probation

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Barack Obama, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Barack Obama/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. - Wikidemon (talk) 14:08, 10 October 2008 (UTC)