User talk:ZjarriRrethues

Diff

Can you produce the diff where you reported Kedadi? Athenean (talk) 06:12, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I can't produce the diff I reported you too, but for both reports you can ask the Wordsmith or do you think that he just happened to see both yours and kedadi's violation? --— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 06:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I will ask him. What's with the sarcasm and nastyness btw? I'm just asking a simple question. Athenean (talk) 20:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Also, I would think it's obvious that a treatise on architecture is not an appropriate source on the ancestry of a figure of the Greek War of Independence. I really don't appreciate how you seek to portray every single edit of mine as "problematic". Athenean (talk) 20:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Then explain your edits because the unexplained deletion of sources is considered problematic. Btw that's not argument making the source inappropriate. It also would be prudent not label comments of other users as nasty.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 21:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

The source is grossly inappropriate and you know it. It is a treatise on architecture for crying out loud. Is the rest of your post a threat of some sort ("it would be prudent...")? I notice you do that a lot. It's not particularly conducive to a positive atmosphere and doesn't come across as particularly civil. I can't ask a simple question without getting sarcasm and veiled threats it seems. Athenean (talk) 21:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

There's a very official way to warn users about their edits and if I wanted to warn you about your edits I would be doing that, so please don't attribute motives to me.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 17:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Hodo Sokoli

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Checkuser

Look, I'm not going to continue this debate on the CU page, because the admins there will probably soon banhammer anybody who's still talking there. I'll tell you just once, you're not looking good there. And you can repeat your claim about "user agents" another million times if you want, it won't make it truer. You are wrong, period. I've discussed stuff with checkusers often enough to understand what they mean. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

No more comments at least by me on that SPI. The admins will probably deal with it--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 22:30, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Interaction ban

Under the authority of WP:ARBMAC#Discretionary sanctions, and per this AE thread, you are banned from directly interacting with or commenting on Athenean, broadly construed, anywhere on Wikipedia for 3 months. Further, please be warned that it is not acceptable to file largely inactionable AE requests or to make factually inaccurate statements within them. Repeated infractions may result in sanctions, up to and including a ban from AE altogether. T. Canens (talk) 14:54, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS September 2010 Newsletter

The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Sources

Udhëheqës të verbër! Ju tendosje mushkonjën por kapërdini devenë (Mateu 23:24).

You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel (Matthew 23:24).

Mate, you accuse me about not sticking to sources provided in the Arbereshe article, but at the same time you just deleted the whole reference provided by a user regarding Arbereshe having as related ethnic group the Arvanites, and not the Shqiptars (Albanians).Periptero (talk) 01:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating your interaction ban on the page Autonomous Republic of Northern Epirus. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. T. Canens (talk) 07:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."