User talk:Courcelles: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 05:25, 21 October 2012

Courcelles is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120
121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130
131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140
141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150
151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

Requesting protection for Queen article

Hello Courcelles. Requesting page protection for Queen. Since the page became unprotected recently almost all edits by ip users have been reverted. In terms of views the article is very busy and has a history of vandalized edits. Thanks. Chie one (talk) 23: 34 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Requesting protection for Jessica Ennis article

Hi Courcelles. Your protection of the Jessica Ennis page expired on October 15 and vandalism has immediately restarted. Please could you protect it again? Kopii90 (talk) 09:05, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done for 3 months. Courcelles 14:44, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Motion on Malleus Fatuorum (2)

Hi Courcelles. Thank you for your alternative motion. Would you also add that Malleus can discuss RfA at User talk:Malleus Fatuorum? This would allow for discussions such as this one so interested users can understand more about the thought process behind his votes. This happened at a recent RfA, where Malleus felt uncomfortable with further discussion there. Thank you for your consideration. Cunard (talk) 05:08, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd have no objection one way or another. As a "keeping order" issue, anyone that goes to Malleus' talk page to talk RFA should know the possibility of incivility or drama or whatnot. Maybe ask this on the page and see if anyone can think of a reason its a bad idea? I'm dead tired, and may be missing something... Courcelles 05:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:08, 21 October 2012 edit Cunard (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 40,017 edits →‎Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Motion on Malleus Fatuorum (2): new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:25, 21 October 2012 edit undo Courcelles (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators 434,773 edits →‎Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Motion on Malleus Fatuorum (2): re Next edit →
Line 26:		Line 26:

	Hi Courcelles. Thank you for your alternative motion. Would you also add that Malleus can discuss RfA at [[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum]]? This would allow for discussions such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum&oldid=518973942#RfA this one] so interested users can understand more about the thought process behind his votes. This happened at a recent RfA, where Malleus [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/QuiteUnusual&diff=prev&oldid=518594195 felt uncomfortable] with further discussion there. Thank you for your consideration. [[User:Cunard\|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard\|talk]]) 05:08, 21 October 2012 (UTC)		Hi Courcelles. Thank you for your alternative motion. Would you also add that Malleus can discuss RfA at [[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum]]? This would allow for discussions such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum&oldid=518973942#RfA this one] so interested users can understand more about the thought process behind his votes. This happened at a recent RfA, where Malleus [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/QuiteUnusual&diff=prev&oldid=518594195 felt uncomfortable] with further discussion there. Thank you for your consideration. [[User:Cunard\|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard\|talk]]) 05:08, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
			*I'd have no objection one way or another. As a "keeping order" issue, anyone that goes to Malleus' talk page to talk RFA should know the possibility of incivility or drama or whatnot. Maybe ask this on the page and see if anyone can think of a reason its a bad idea? I'm dead tired, and may be missing something... [[User:Courcelles\|Courcelles]] 05:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)