User talk:Europe22

---

Leave me a message below. Please be nice and assume good faith !

Attributions

Hi, I just stumbled by coincidence on the page you created at Contrex. I am bilinual French-English and I will clean up the translation for you. However, perhaps you did not know, but when you take an article from another Wikipedia, you must place an attribution template on the English article's talk page. It's a template like this {{translated page|fr|page name|version=|insertversion=|small=no|Translation and reediting by [[User:xxxxxxx]].}}. You can see an example at Talk:Brontë. if anything is not clear, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page.--Kudpung (talk) 10:33, 11 July 2010 (UTC) PS: I see you did in fact place an attribution, but it should go on the article's talk page. No harm done :) --Kudpung (talk) 10:56, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Plus grandir (live - 7'maxi - picture-disc).JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Plus grandir (live - 7'maxi - picture-disc).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ainsi soit je... (maxi).JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ainsi soit je... (maxi).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:31, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Verification of Sukyo Mahikari

Noticed that you gave constructive suggestions for the article Sukyo Mahikari. This article has been problematic for a long time. Can you, as an independent and neutral reviewer, help in verifying the article in terms of neutrality and remove the issues? Thanks, Dexter73 (talk) 20:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

86.161.239.140

I noticed your reversions. Who do you suspect this is? Why?—Kww(talk) 16:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

thanks, the other ip was blocked, reportted this one too. Mister sparky (talk) 17:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alors on danse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alors on danse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you, very much, for your kind words at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia about my work on the article. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 18:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Peniston

Hey hey hey! Thanks heaps for joining me, today I would like to get attached all reference links as for all Peniston singles and albums. Thank you for help! Benuliak 20:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Finally (remix).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Finally (remix).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Finally.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Finally.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

lectorium page

Greetings,

I noticed your recent modifications to the Lectorium Rosicrucianum page. What is your interest and knowledge about the Lectorium?

Best regards,

Cbpersel (talk) 17:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Craig

lectorium page

OK. Very good.

About the "?" at the top of the Lectorium page ... This article includes a list of references or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate.

I noticed you added inline references, but is this a request of more inline citations for other sections within the article? I can provide those if needed.

Best regards,

Cbpersel (talk) 17:21, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Craig

Incorrect information about the Lectorium

Hello,

I noticed some incorrect information about the Lectorium teachings .. to quote ... "According to Rijckenborgh, Christ never came on Earth and his sacrifical death is a mistaken teaching; this can lead LR members to leave the Church.[11]"

While the Lectorium teachings do not focus on the physical and/or historical manifestation of Christ (i.e. worshiping a figure) it is felt that Jesus Christ was indeed a living, historical figure and a necessary step in the manifestation of the resurrection of the "original man" in this world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbpersel (talk • contribs) 11:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Incorrect information about the Lectorium

Thank you for the changes, but even thought it seems to be from a reliable source it is still refuted by the actual teachings of the Lectorium or Mr. van Rijckenborgh. I'm not sure where the authors got their information. Today I will get direct references from literature of the Lectorium that contradict Fahlbusch and Bromiley. Their information is probably from secondary sources and not the direct literature or teachings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbpersel (talk • contribs) 12:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Incorrect information about the Lectorium

OK. So I will get direct quotes from the literature and Mr. van Rijckenborgh that contradict the author's information. I read that section of the Encyclopedia of Christianity and the authors give no supportive reference(s) for Mr. van Rijckenborgh's statement regarding an historical Christ. It seems to be based on personal opinion rather than supportive documentation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbpersel (talk • contribs) 13:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for René la Taupe

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

CCP

Peniston's song Finally charted at #5 in the Netherlands (http://dutchcharts.nl/showitem.asp?interpret=Ce+Ce+Peniston&titel=Finally&cat=s or http://lescharts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Ce+Ce+Peniston&titel=Finally&cat=s), no at #6 as very likely initiated by the link of yours. That is why the reference links for both was updated. Anyway, as far as I am aware, the number of reference links is not limited to only one source, especially in case of potantial disaccords. Cheers

Hi, i read your msg early today, so no worry. Ain't retired for u at all. Be well n thank u for help earlier. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.49.76.76 (talk) 18:41, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi, thanks but I think I learned my lesson here and wanna focus on else stuff now.

Anyway, could you complete Peniston's discography and to include missing information as for her chart entries in the Japanese Tokio Hot 100? I was lucky to find following details yet:

1. "Finally" charted at No #2 for three weeks (on March 8-22, 1992) and was classified as No.#41 in the Tokio Hot 100 end-year chart in 1992 (http://www.j-wave.co.jp/original/tokiohot100/chart_19/1992.htm)
2. "We Got a Love Thang" charted at No. #3 for two weeks (on April 12-19, 1992), and also reached No.#21 in the Japanese end-year chart in 1992 (http://www.j-wave.co.jp/original/tokiohot100/chart_19/1992.htm)
3. "I'm in the Mood" even topped the Japanese Hot 100 at number 1 (on February 13, 1994) + No.#30 in the Japanese end-year chart of '94 (http://www.j-wave.co.jp/original/tokiohot100/chart_19/1994.htm)
4. "I'm Not Over You" peaked at #94 (on July 3, 1994)
5. "Hit by Love" climbed to #35 (on October 16, 1994)
6. "Movin' On" charted at #30" (on September 29, 1996), and
7. "Somebody Else's Guy" scored at #26 (on April 12, 1998)

Peniston also had two singles simultaneously in the Japanese Top 10 in 1992 (while "Finally" charted at #7 in Tokio Hot 100 on April 5, her single "We Got a Love Thang" scored at number 4 the same week. This information should probably be highlighted also in her discography article.

Another interesting detail that should be added is that in Japan her song "I Will Be Received" (which was not released elsewhere on single and was originally available only on her Thought 'Ya Knew album), independetly entered the Japanese Hot 100 Tokio as well and peaked at No.#64 (on March 20, 1994); perhaps thanks to her single "I'm in the Mood" (at that time still in Top 10 in fact) that surprisingly became her number one in Japan, and even her only official number one hit single to date in whatsoever any music world chart.

The reference link for Hot 100 Tokio chart is http://www.j-wave.co.jp/original/tokiohot100/, where you can verify all the chart details. No need to reply, be well, and so long.

DYK for Église Saint-Pothin

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Books

Hi my friend, might you see these two Books I created...

• Book:Mylène Farmer
• Book:Celine Dion

...and what do you think? Best, --Discographer (talk) 00:42, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

mylene farmer digital no 1

no 1 in french charts http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/pag-260585-Telechargement-Titres.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.1.91.144 (talk) 23:08, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

mylene

digital no 3 is also for the belgian chart or the swiss top 50...so why do you provide details for the digital charts of these countries there and not for the french one??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.1.91.144 (talk) 23:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

mylene

oook thnx for the information!!!cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.1.91.144 (talk) 13:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Freed from desire.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freed from desire.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Freed from desire2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freed from desire2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

"This Is It"

Europe22, hi my friend, can you check something for me, please? Could you find out if this was released in the physical form of a CD single, whether promotional or commercial, or just only as airplay release? I have this link here [1] from the article, so as to help out some. Thanks as always! Best, --Discographer (talk) 02:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

User:DoctorMaster2010

Hi, I noticed you tagged this user as a sockpuppet of User:KirkleyHigh. I was wondering why they haven't been blocked (or investigated). I wonder if they are a sockpuppet of User:The Twelfth Doctor. AnemoneProjectors 18:43, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

"On est tous des imbéciles"

Hi EU22, I c/e'd this the best that I could. Very minor changes; might you take a look. Best, --Discographer (talk) 23:16, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Happy New Year's

Hi Europe22, my dear friend, have a Happy New Year's and let us remain as brothers! Thanks! Best, --Discographer (talk) 22:54, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

DoctorMaster2010

I understand you have recently reverted edits I have made to articles relating to The Black Eyed Peas because i am a "banned user". Sir, i have never been banned, so i do not understand when you have got this information from. Please stop accusing me of things I have never done, and stop reverting good edits just because you believe a piece of information which is untrue. ---DM--- (talk) 07:02, 13 January 2011 (UTC)DoctorMaster2010 (07:02 13 January 2011)

I was just wondering if you have accused DoctorMaster2010 of being a sockpuppet, why has nothing been done? To be honest, I have always assumed this user was a sockpuppet of User:The Twelfth Doctor but there wasn't really any evidence. AnemoneProjectors 09:47, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

I just realised I already asked you about this but you never replied. AnemoneProjectors 09:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

My reply --Europe22 (talk) 21:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh thanks, I did see it and I did reply but I did nothing about it. I obviously forgot about it and on looking again, I assumed you had not replied as I expected you would reply on your own talk page, so I apologise. AnemoneProjectors 21:41, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

And I see you've started an investigation now, so that's good :-) AnemoneProjectors 21:46, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Traité d'athéologie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Traité d'athéologie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 20:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Don't you want me.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Don't you want me.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Move your body.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Move your body.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Barnstars

		The Original Barnstar
		For your outstanding work on Antoinism, which I noticed (yes, I did) that you built from the ground up virtually by yourself, simultaneously adding reliable sources and maintaining acceptable quality. It was a fun article to copyedit, and I learned a lot of things I never knew before. I also wish to mention that I find the quality of your single-handed contribution even more amazing given that English is not your native language. Bronsonboy HQ 14:05, 25 April 2011 (UTC)