User talk:EvergreenFir

List of Fish Hooks episodes

I also restored your edits on List of Fish Hooks episodes. I personally would rather listen to REAL Wikipedia professionals like you and most of everyone else than unprofessional ones like that user who removed your edit on that page. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Violence against women

Why?--Blanca Lap (talk) 19:20, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Because GBV is about either (1) violence rooted in misogyny or (2) violence that disproportionately or exclusively affects women and girls. It's not just any violence that occurs against women. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes, it's the type of violence that occurs to women for being women.--Blanca Lap (talk) 19:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

By removing the "predominantly or exclusively" part, the sentence rads as if any violence that affects women is GBV though. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

You're wrong. The text doesn't make that impression. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blanca Lap (talk • contribs)

Let's move this to the article talk page. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

@Blanca Lap: Sorry I've been busy at work. I'll take a look in a moment. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

MoS talk: ie, eg and etc

You have closed an RfC saying there are two on one page about the same topic and both started by the same user. Can you please check your reasoning, as I think you will find this is not true. --Sb2001 (talk) 08:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

You removed referenced information and new citations

Two days ago, I spent an hour adding citations that were missing from Wikipedia's "Shooting of Terence Crutcher" page and adding additional information.

After finishing, I received this message from you: "Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted."

I lost my hour and all of my helpful edits because you decided that you did not want them. I presume that you did not actually look at them because, if you had, you would have seen that all of them were sourced with references.

I am an Oklahoma attorney who is intimately familiar with the facts and sources of information pertaining to the content that I was editing. I presume that you are not.

You have done a disservice to Wikipedia and to everyone who uses the "Shooting of Terence Crutcher" page for information.

On a side note: I'm glad that I'm not you. You must live a sad life if you spend it "policing" Wikipedia.

209.213.139.15 (talk) 22:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@209.213.139.15: As an attorney I'm sure you understand the importance of rules, procedures, and proper presentation of evidence. To speak you're jargon, you added prejudicial information, i.e., information that presents an undue negative narrative and was, at the very least, unnecessary for a reader's understanding of the event. Just as with rape shield laws, you cannot bring in (mis)leading tangential information into the article to paint a skewed picture. For Wikipedia's rules on this, see WP:WEIGHT.

I'm concerned that as an attorney "intimately familiar with the facts" surrounding this case, you may have a conflict of interest. If so, please read that linked page.

Last, my sad life on Wikipedia is a hobby. While I take it seriously and enjoy it, I don't take it personally. I suggest you do the same. EvergreenFir (talk) 02:22, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding reboots

Why are you removing the vast majority of reboots from the Reboot page? Jamster93 (talk) 22:06, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Catalan Countries

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catalan Countries. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions Notification for Paraphilia and Transgender Issues

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding transgender issues and paraphilia classification (e.g. hebephilia), a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Brexit123 (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Fictional victims of child abuse

But... But... They are so wacko, they must be! Cheerio! Jim1138 (talk) 09:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Good Contributor Erusnika1 (talk) 21:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Russian Connections

The opposition has provided no valid reason to remove my section, while I've provided evidence supporting my edit. The lack of consensus is due to partisan beliefs rather than scholarship.