User talk:Gmcssb: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Darkness Shines (talk | contribs)
→‎Notification: new section
Line 65: Line 65:
:Either you self-revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Narendra_Modi&diff=573634910&oldid=573634248 this] now or I report you to [[WP:AN3]]. You are aware of discussions, you have been warned about edit warring and enough is enough. Have some patience otherwise you are going to be the latest casualty at the Modi article. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 12:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
:Either you self-revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Narendra_Modi&diff=573634910&oldid=573634248 this] now or I report you to [[WP:AN3]]. You are aware of discussions, you have been warned about edit warring and enough is enough. Have some patience otherwise you are going to be the latest casualty at the Modi article. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 12:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
::I see that someone else has reverted your efforts. Please let that be the end of it until you have consensus on the talk page. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 13:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
::I see that someone else has reverted your efforts. Please let that be the end of it until you have consensus on the talk page. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 13:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

== Notification ==

{{Ivmbox | image = yes | The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision|Final decision]]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]], with the appropriate sections of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures]], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | valign = center | [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|35px|alt=|link=]] }}

You are getting this notification fur to your edit warring. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 19:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:07, 27 September 2013

Welcome

Hello, Gmcssb, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:34, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Test

Test. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.67.140.45 (talk) 09:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bhatt Mathuranath Shastri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bhatt Mathuranath Shastri

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barkha Dutt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blogger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Sagarika Ghose shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Blackguard 22:43, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sagarika Ghose

You just violated 3RR and restored BLP violations into the article, self revert or be reported. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shivram Dattatray Joshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deccan College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Modi

You really, really need to read the copious discussion over the last few months at Talk:Narendra Modi before making edits such as this. The article has been fully protected and people have been both blocked and banned for their behaviour with regard to it. For your own sake, please tread carefully and discuss before making substantial changes. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 10:16, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please point to the discussion? Gmcssb (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have done. - Sitush (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Narendra Modi. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Either you self-revert this now or I report you to WP:AN3. You are aware of discussions, you have been warned about edit warring and enough is enough. Have some patience otherwise you are going to be the latest casualty at the Modi article. - Sitush (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I see that someone else has reverted your efforts. Please let that be the end of it until you have consensus on the talk page. - Sitush (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. 

You are getting this notification fur to your edit warring. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]