User talk:HanzoHattori: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rlevse (talk | contribs)
→‎Blocked: more info
HanzoHattori (talk | contribs)
Line 66: Line 66:
==Blocked==
==Blocked==
Your recent block of 12 days or so seems not to have made the point. You continue to be disruptive and incivil. Just one example, calling people "psycho" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bosnian_Mujahideen&diff=188468297&oldid=188460142], will not be tolerated. I have blocked you for two weeks. Also see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=188497753&oldid=188496978]. Disruption and incivility is not the way to solve the problems with the Macedonian articles, or any article for that matter.<span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 00:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Your recent block of 12 days or so seems not to have made the point. You continue to be disruptive and incivil. Just one example, calling people "psycho" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bosnian_Mujahideen&diff=188468297&oldid=188460142], will not be tolerated. I have blocked you for two weeks. Also see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FArbitration_enforcement&diff=188497753&oldid=188496978]. Disruption and incivility is not the way to solve the problems with the Macedonian articles, or any article for that matter.<span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 00:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

== Oh Osli you one silly fucker, you can kiss my ass ==

Anyway, what I wanted to write in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Second_Chechen_War#.22Commanders.22 is

Nah, the mostly conscript regulars were (especially during "active phase" or whatever they call it in their newspeak now) and various MVD forces (police, internals, OMON/OSNAZ, whatnot) are. The FSB spooks and troops shouldn't be really overlooked too (and they include border guards too). The boys with beards are the only Spetsnaz units officially stationed in Chechnya (unless they go over to Lebanon or Georgia), but the boys who shave go in and around without announcements and publicity (and their deaths are often kept in secrecy, too).

Cheers. --[[User:HanzoHattori|HanzoHattori]] ([[User talk:HanzoHattori#top|talk]]) 00:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:46, 2 February 2008

4,000 Polish officers and men

Hi HanzoHattori; happy new year. I noticed that you had to change the number of Katyn Massacre victims again in the article on von Gerstendorf. I think we could stop this blatant changing of numbers (seems to happen frequently) by citing a source immediately after the numbers. Can you provide one for this spot? If the citation is planted immediately next to the number, then other editors won't be able to change it so easily while making it look like it's attributed to an already-supplied source. Thanks, and best regards, Jim_Lockhart (talk) 03:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) I’m not sure whether this is in line with WP policy, but I swiped a citation from the Katyn article. Have a look and let me know if you think this is improper. Best regards, Jim_Lockhart (talk) 09:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"I leave Wikipedia in protest"

I read your userpage post entitled "I leave Wikipedia in protest." I know exactly how you feel, but I hope that you don't abandon Wikipedia. Your intelligence and energy and motivations are needed here! Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 13:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OKay, okay. --HanzoHattori (talk) 14:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Second Chechen War

Please either leave a summary explaining your edits or refrain from deleting large amounts of content without an explanation.

January 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Second Chechen War. Thank you. Transcendence (talk) 01:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Alaexis

Look for my answer at the article talk page please. Alæxis¿question? 16:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thepunisher2.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Thepunisher2.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption warning

Please do not continue to disrupt the AfD by reinserting discussion [1] [2] that has already been moved to the talk page. At least two uninvolved parties are trying to restore order to this page. Do not thwart our efforts, please. Jehochman Talk 10:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting me. You seem to be attempting to WP:OWN this discussion by placing your arguments with greater prominence than everybody else. I am trying to find a way to fix this, but you keep reverting. Stop and talk. Jehochman Talk 10:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No. YOU stop removing MY ARGUMENTS. --HanzoHattori (talk) 10:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I am responding to a request from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard for help with disruption on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bosnian Mujahideen. I noticed that you were placing your arguments with greater prominence than the other editors. The common sense thing for me to do was to refactor the page and move some of the discussion to the talk page. I have done this in as neutral a way as possible. I have no opinion whatsoever on the content issues. My concern is to provide every editor the opportunity to participate.
You made at least two personal attacks that I had to remove.[3] [4] Please don't make any more. Please don't undo my refactoring. If you disagree with what I've done, ask another administrator to check my work. I am going to post a note at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Deletion debate needing a sysop touch asking for review. I also recommend that you take it easy. You are posting so many comments on this page that you may be precluding others from joining the discussion. Jehochman Talk 10:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't do that. I've undone it. Talk page debates of deletion discussions should not be blanked, even if you think the conversation is over - they should remain open for others to read. Thanks. Pedro :  Chat  10:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, MY ARGUMENTS should stay WHERE I WROTE THEM, not on the talk page. I'm being censored. NO. --HanzoHattori (talk) 10:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How on earth are you being censored when you're blanking your own comments? Please do not do that again. Pedro :  Chat  10:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They were moved there from the project page and deleted there! God dammn. WHAT THE FUCK? --HanzoHattori (talk) 10:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for poor decorum, disruption, and virulent personal attacks on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bosnian Mujahideen and elsewhere. As you appear to have a history of such conduct, this block will be longer than normal. east.718 at 11:27, January 17, 2008

you'd better come back soon hanzo... - PietervHuis (talk) 01:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mystwarriors.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mystwarriors.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hanzo. So are you ever coming back? I helped Pieter a little with editing Chechen war article, but I am not really familiar with the subject. But maybe you are right. It is better to leave WP for good than get a lot of stress here. Very best wishes, Biophys (talk) 01:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Great to see you back! I am sorry for voting "neutral" in RfC of Bosnian Mujahideen, but we often have different opinions, which is fine. I must admit however that you know those Mujahideen subjects much better than me.Biophys (talk) 21:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please take it easy

If you're feeling heated, try and take a break to cool down. Personal attacks and angry messages will only result in a long block for you, considering your recent and past block history. Specifically, I mean comments like this. You can be a very productive editor, but letting yourself get heated enough to make comments like that isn't going to help resolve the issues. Cheers! Vassyana (talk) 23:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your recent block of 12 days or so seems not to have made the point. You continue to be disruptive and incivil. Just one example, calling people "psycho" [5], will not be tolerated. I have blocked you for two weeks. Also see [6]. Disruption and incivility is not the way to solve the problems with the Macedonian articles, or any article for that matter.RlevseTalk 00:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Osli you one silly fucker, you can kiss my ass

Anyway, what I wanted to write in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Second_Chechen_War#.22Commanders.22 is

Nah, the mostly conscript regulars were (especially during "active phase" or whatever they call it in their newspeak now) and various MVD forces (police, internals, OMON/OSNAZ, whatnot) are. The FSB spooks and troops shouldn't be really overlooked too (and they include border guards too). The boys with beards are the only Spetsnaz units officially stationed in Chechnya (unless they go over to Lebanon or Georgia), but the boys who shave go in and around without announcements and publicity (and their deaths are often kept in secrecy, too).

Cheers. --HanzoHattori (talk) 00:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]