User talk:Jayen466

File:Animalibrí.gif Wikipedia ads file info – show another – #178 RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report No RfXs since 12:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online Arbitration Committee proceedings recent changes purge this page view or discuss this template Case requests Request name Motions Initiated Votes Persistent WP:IDONTLIKEIT behavior in WP:NCROY discussions   10 May 2024 0/4/0 [edit] Open cases Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due Venezuelan politics (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 20 Apr 2024 04 May 2024 [edit] Recently closed cases (Past cases) Case name Closed Conflict of interest management 13 Apr 2024 Mzajac 7 May 2024 Clarification and Amendment requests Request name Motions  Case Posted Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing none (orig. case) 30 April 2024 Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 4 none (orig. case) 13 May 2024 Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation none (orig. case) 13 May 2024 Arbitrator motions No arbitrator motions are currently open. Real-life work-pressure: 10 1 = nothing to do 5 = should really be getting on with work >5 = can only snatch a moment here and there 10 = frenzied, suffering from lack of sleep Click this button. Reference this BLP. The Signpost: 27 December 2010 Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting News and notes: Director of Technical Operations hired; South Korean mayor sues; brief news In the news: Designing Wikipedia and the origin of page histories; brief news WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA) Features and admins: The best of the week Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC) 2010 Nobel Peace Prize Happy New Year, Andreas! There is a question at the above I would appreciate your views on. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 03:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC) Thanks, Ohconfucius. I'll look into it tomorrow. --JN466 00:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC) The Signpost: 3 January 2011 2010 in review: Review of the year News and notes: Record fundraiser celebrated and debated; Board-appointed Trustees; brief news In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC) About SPK Hi there. Thanks for you efforts. May I ask you: is this [1] really a reliable, verifiable source for such an accusation. For me it seems like a gossip never sourced but a WP:BLP#Avoid_gossip_and_feedback_loops. This book as any other with such accusation, fails to provide the source and the context of such an accusation although presented as a fact. Perhaps you should read [2] and look for the parts related to president Heinemann. Also external authors have mentioned it was a desinformation campaign against SPK. It also seems like editing Nelson Mandela article based on the police warrants made against him which lead him to prison, with the difference that none from SPK was ever sentenced nor imprisoned for that allegedely "plan to bomb a president train". If you don't mind I could also mention here some concerns about the other sources and affirmations ("many from SPK bacem RAF", etc.). PD: a retoric question: should we consider SPK as terrorists just because MagisterMathematicae said that "SPK (is well known back from 2005) from using terrorist-like tactics"[3]? -- ClaudioSantos (talk) 15:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC) To be honest, I would have to do some more research on this. I am not familiar with the history, or alternative narratives. Which languages do you speak? I could help with German sources. Rubin seems to satisfy WP:RS; but I also know that the quality of terrorism literature is variable. --JN466 16:09, 7 January 2011 (UTC) Any source claiming that members from SPK were terrorist should be considered a dubious non-reliable source: that crime did not even exist in German Law at SPK times (70/71), but it was introduced in 1976, years after SPK self-disolution, years after the trials. None of SPK were accused of that crime ever. Calumny consists in accusing someone of a crime he/she did not commited. But not only for Grem Guma but for J.P. Sartre it was a political persecution against those people of SPK. Off topic: well, for my part I'm really concerned that MagisterMathematicae published accusations of "terrorism-like tactics" refering to those people from SPK. And I'm also concerned with this sort of behaviour:[4], where admin-user Sabbut published a private name of a person, obviously without his/her consent and accused him/her of "threats". Exactly the same procedure was used also in the english wikipedia:[5] by user unfortunate. It seems that demanding not to publish defamatory and offensive material -which is forbidden by the own policies of wikipedia but also by law- is assumed by some wikipedian-users and wikipedian-admins as an allegedly "threat", an allegedely disruption and as an excuse to publish defamatory and unsourced contentious material and even to accuse the people who try to stop that behaviour as people acting with "terrorism-like tactics". That is very serious, don't you think so? I read that wikipedia forbid legal threats but does it means a wikipedian is allowed to act against the law here and to accuse people of acting like terrorists? -- ClaudioSantos (talk) 18:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC) I've refactored the name on that talk page; there is no need to have it there. I agree that the edit by Unfortunate was "unfortunate", i.e. unsourced and a blatant BLP violation (even according to the version of WP:BLP that existed at the time). Do you have a link or source for the Guma/Sartre comments? Best, --JN466 22:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC)