User talk:Power of 200 Million

Wikipedia is not a soapbox

Wikipedia talk pages are not forums for you to air your grievances; they are intended for article improvement via material that is reliably sourced. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Power of 200 Million, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Power of 200 Million! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Final warning

If you continue to use Wikipedia for a soapbox, you will be blocked from editing indefinitely. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Unbelievable is this the level to which wikipedia has gone? you are now going to try and stop people from posting in the discussion pages? this is ridiculous, you cannot edit the personal user page of someone. Your own page is a complete blog http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ohnoitsjamie.

The discussion pages were the only things left in wikipedia where facts were being put, the main pages are paid for by people anyway to stop others from editing them. The only thing left was the discussion pages. If the discussion pages go then pretty much everything is gone in wikipedia. On top of that you are trying to police the personal user page as well? unbelievable. Power of 200 Million (talk) 01:44, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Paid editing is VERY much frowned upon on Wikipedia. If you have any evidence that somebody is being paid to promote a particular point of view, you should contact the arbitration committee immediately - such an editor would be liable to a lengthy, possibly an indefinite block from editing.

On the talk page, you have been told what would it take for your contributions to be included in an article. Wikipedia does not serve for unsourced accusations; you need to find reliable sources. Even then, should you find a source for Pakistan making a particular accusation against India, you can't include it as if it were an indisputable fact (not unless there's an overwhelming agreement in reliable sources that the accusation is true). Instead, you need to mention who made the accusation, what the accusation was, and perhaps what was India's response.

You need to have a look at the policies of neutrality and verifiability. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Power of 200 Million, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

Since you've shown some interest in editing topics related to Pakistan, we hope you'll stay and add content to Pakistan-related articles. Pakistani topics are generally underrepresented on Wikipedia and you can help counter this imbalance by becoming a regular contributor and by joining or watchlisting Pakistan-related discussions (for example, Notice board for Pakistan-related topics). Again, welcome!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Mar4d (talk) 08:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Pakistan

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• You can give your input at project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
• You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
• Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan article in Wikipedia.
• Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
• Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
• Add your name in the members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: {{User WikiProject Pakistan}}

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We are looking forward to see you around!

Mar4d (talk) 08:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at Talk:Kashmir conflict. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing this website, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia (please see WP:NOT for further details). Thank you. TheStrikeΣagle 02:03, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. 

Darkness Shines (talk) 02:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Alright I understand, I will make my discussions in the future in a more wikipedia format. Power of 200 Million (talk) 03:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Not really, now that you and your other three socks are blocked. Darkness Shines (talk) 03:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Who is "nangparbat"??

who is "nangparbat"? and why is a sockpuppet tag put on my page in regarding that person lol

yea i am not "nangparbat", you could atleast check the ips of people before accusing them of sockpuppet Power of 200 Million (talk) 03:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC)