User talk:Robofish: Difference between revisions
→Request for comment: Template:more plot: new section |
Salimfadhley (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
[[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 21#Template:More plot]] is closed as '''keep'''. However, these issues are still discussed in [[Template talk:More plot]]. Please join in discussion for more consensus. --[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 01:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC) |
[[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 21#Template:More plot]] is closed as '''keep'''. However, these issues are still discussed in [[Template talk:More plot]]. Please join in discussion for more consensus. --[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 01:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
== [[Donna Eden]] == |
|||
You may be interested to know that there's a new AFD discussion on this topic: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donna Eden (2nd nomination)]]. I'm mentioning this to you because I note that you took part in previous discussions about the notability/verifiability of this article. --[[User:Salimfadhley|Salimfadhley]] ([[User talk:Salimfadhley|talk]]) 13:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:48, 15 March 2012
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Note on RFA Messages: I often participate in discussions at Requests for adminship. If I have participated in your RFA, I will check the page later to see the result. I do not wish to receive a template message thanking me for my support (or opposition). Thanks for your cooperation.
Additional notes:
- This talk page is not a forum; it is meant for messages to me only. Please take off-topic discussion elsewhere.
- If you leave a message here, I will reply on your talk page unless requested otherwise.
- If I leave a message on your talk page, I prefer for you to either reply here, or notify me of your reply with the {{Talkback}} template.
|
A barnstar for you!
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For standing up against Occupy Wikipedia. Wehwalt (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC) |
Let me add my support for that, even though I have a different view on this issue. Standing up for what you believe in, and defending it, is vital for making Wikipedia work. Geometry guy 23:37, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Political blog
Was this because I took fire axe to the spam in it earlier today, or just a coincidence? The article definitely needs some loving, it's a bit of a mess.
Also, is the act of adding those tags likely to get articles related to the projects worked on? If it is, I might dig into the list of projects and use the templates where I think they're needed --GraemeL (talk) 20:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Nope, just a coincidence - I often trawl through related articles tagging them with wikiproject templates. As for your question, I suspect it doesn't make much difference, though it depends on the wikiproject - some are much more active than others. I figure that if I see an article that should be in a particular wikiproject, I may as well tag it, just so that project becomes aware that it exists and might take a look at it at some point. Robofish (talk) 20:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Aversive Racism
I edited aversive racism adding a line informed by my being a mixed race Republican who met and discussed politics with Obama while he was at at Harvard. RichardBond (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Robofish, thanks for your work and comment on the One-third hypothesis article. Could you take an other look here and tell me if you could agree with the compromise I presented? -- Mdd (talk) 00:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- I guess I didn't make myself clear. I do agree with your removal of the text. I just want it restored on the talk page. -- Mdd (talk) 00:33, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Barnstar
Removed Tag stating primary Sources
Dear Robofish,
I have removed the tag-
This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. |
mentioned in the article PEN American Center, and have added enough references to reliable third party sources. Please do care to review the article. Salman Gurung 10:49, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
A request for comments has been opened on administrator User:Fæ. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. Thank you, MadmanBot (talk) 20:02, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
RfC
Hello, you recently participated in a straw poll concerning a link at the Campaign for "santorum" neologism article. I am giving all the poll participants a heads-up that a RfC on the same issue is being conducted here. Be——Critical 19:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Rename at Campaign for "santorum" neologism
Hello, since you recently participated in an RfC at Campaign for "santorum" neologism, I thought you might be interested in this proposal for renaming the article, or perhaps another of the rename proposals on the page. Best, Be——Critical 22:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
New cfds regarding "Old Fooians"
Two new cfds propose the renaming of some twenty categories. Most of those who took part in last year's cfd "Former pupils by school in the United Kingdom" seem unaware of them, so I am notifying all those who took part in that discussion, to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus. Please consider contributing here and here. Moonraker (talk) 13:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings, Robofish! Congratulations on studying for your degree (read it on your user page). This isn't terribly important nor urgent. I wondered why you had included the WikiProject Numismatics template as part of Ven (currency)? Ven is a digital currency, or electronic currency. Does it have physical coins too? I know that bitcoins can be physical coins, which are quite lovely to look at. Perhaps the same is true for Ven? I couldn't find any references to such, however. I left another lonely entry on the Ven currency talk page about this. I'm sorry if I seemed strident. But digital currencies are controversial, so it is difficult, regardless of personal opinion. I know, we are supposed to be impartial, but many aren't. You know how that goes by now. Cynicism, but just a bit. Okay, that's all for now. Sorry, I'm too chatty, but this is a user talk page! I never have anyone to talk to on Wikipedia, so I'm taking advantage of this opportunity. --FeralOink (talk) 21:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! I read your very prompt response, and proceeded accordingly, i.e. got rid of it. --FeralOink (talk) 12:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Notification
Canadian mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has been nominated for deletion, since you participated in the previous discussion, you may wish to participate in this one, the discussion is located at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (2nd nomination). Cheers, --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:42, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Made a recommended Keep including subsections Natural Law vs Positive Law with protection against your repeat vandalism. MrsKrishan (talk) 04:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Request for comment: Template:more plot
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 21#Template:More plot is closed as keep. However, these issues are still discussed in Template talk:More plot. Please join in discussion for more consensus. --George Ho (talk) 01:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
You may be interested to know that there's a new AFD discussion on this topic: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donna Eden (2nd nomination). I'm mentioning this to you because I note that you took part in previous discussions about the notability/verifiability of this article. --Salimfadhley (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)