User talk:Soccershoes1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Warning: Adding unreferenced controversial information about living persons on Michael Zigomanis. (TW)
Line 106: Line 106:


[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Macedonia naming dispute]], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please make use of the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 01:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Macedonia naming dispute]], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please make use of the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 01:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

== April 2012 ==
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please '''stop adding unreferenced or [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|poorly referenced]] biographical content, especially if controversial''' to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at [[:Michael Zigomanis]]. Content of this nature could be regarded as [[Wikipedia:Libel|defamatory]] and is in violation of [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|Wikipedia policy]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-biog3 --> [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 05:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:57, 6 April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia!

- Welcome-
Cookies to welcome you!
Hello, Soccershoes1! Thank you for your contributions. My name's Brambleclawx and I just wanted to say hi and Welcome to Wikipedia! If you need help, try looking at some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of the world's largest encyclopædia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name, the date and the time. If you are already loving Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field every time you edit. Again, welcome, and happy editing! Brambleclawx 04:54, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vergina, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A Macedonian, a Greek. (talk) 19:08, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonia (region)

Could you please supply a reliable source for your second revert? You have reverted against two separate editors. THis is not constructive. Thank youGingervlad (talk) 00:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Alexander the Great. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Charles (talk) 23:02, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander the Great, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alexander the Great. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
  3. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Alexander the Great. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 23:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

I see you have recently been blocked for edit warring, so you should be familiar with the policies regarding that. Nevertheless I would advice you to read Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle before proceeding. --Saddhiyama (talk) 00:40, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander the Great. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Edit warring Charles (talk) 21:26, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Macedonia naming dispute, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Michael Zigomanis. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fut.Perf. 05:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]