Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 31: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:40, 31 March 2024

< March 30

April 1 >

March 31

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 31, 2024.

Medical-grade silicon

Medical-grade silicon → Silicon (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I accidentally mistyped "silicone". I moved the redirect to Medical-grade silicone but of course that left a redirect. Medical-grade silicon is presumably a thing, but I think anyone searching for it is more likely to want medical-grade silicone; I'm not the only one to make this typo, it's quite common, and some people also don't know the difference.

I request discussion; I don't know what outcome would be best. Should this redir be a disambiguation page? Deleted? Redirected as a misspelling, or a a topic in its own right? HLHJ (talk) 16:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Style (EP)

Style (EP) → Style (Super Junior-D&E album) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

At this title for five minutes at creation due to a mistake of page creator. Incorrect and potentially confusing. Rusalkii (talk) 05:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Style (disambiguation)#Albums. Thryduulf (talk) 12:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Thryduulf. Jay 💬 14:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There are not any "EP" subjects titled "Style" listed at Style (disambiguation)#Albums. Steel1943 (talk) 07:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are however things that may be looked for using this title. Thryduulf (talk) 11:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget as per Thryduulf. While it's true that we don't yet have any EPs titled Style, if we ever get one, this is exactly where in the disambiguation it'd show up. Yes, I know that that's technically an argument in violation of WP:ATA#CRYSTAL, hush. In addition, as Thryduulf pointed out in reply to Steel, it handily points anyone mistakenly looking for "EP" when the recording they're looking for is actually an "Album" to the right place. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nickps (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Post-punk metal

Post-punk metal → Post-punk (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

term doesnt exist. this user is known for creating nonsensical and disruptive redirects FMSky (talk) 13:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Placeholder (Computing)

Placeholder (Computing) → printf (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Placeholder#Mathematics and computer science includes four potential targets. It does not appear obvious to me that the target of this redirect is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Nickps (talk) 18:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to the dab section as a {{R from incomplete disambiguation}} per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 19:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Placeholder (computing) without leaving a redirect as this is arguably an WP:RDAB situation as "computing" isn't a proper noun. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to the dab section as per Thryduulf, then create Placeholder (computing) as a second redirect that also targets to the same dab, both with {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}. I don't see how moving a redirect as per Crouch would be helpful, but if we have the incorrectly capitalized version, it only makes sense to also have the correctly capitalized version. Also, the bigger problem is still the target, not the name of the redirect. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 20:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the lowercase disambiguator should just be created as well (and mark this one as a {{R avoided double redirect}} of it) per Lunamann and WP:MOVEREDIRECT (basically don't move a redirect unless it's necessary, and moving this one isn't). "(Computing)" and "(computing)" are equally plausible search terms. Thryduulf (talk) 02:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Search takes care of capitalization, we don't need to keep incorrectly capitalized qualifier redirects without a good reason. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Search only takes care of capitalisation for a subset of the ways people navigate Wikipedia. The good reason to keep this redirect is to help people navigate to the target they are looking for, but what we actually need is a good reason to delete a redirect and incorrect but plausible capitalisation is never a good reason on its own to delete. Thryduulf (talk) 20:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That would be a good reason if those people exist. This page was visited by 6 people last month all of whom were almost surely looking for the non-existent placeholder (computing) instead. Is there an example of a way to navigate WP that actual people use and that would require the incorrectly capitalized version even if the correct one existed? If not, this redirect is useless and should be ~~deleted~~ moved to the correct title per Crouch. Nickps (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be the case that such redirects can get less than 100 views in over 8 years where the correct version exists. See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 29#Yoda (Song) and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 13#Morbius (Film) though there is no data there. The point in any case is that of those less than 100 views its likely most would have got there without the redirect as the search takes you to the best capitalization it can if there isn't an exact match. And some may also have been from bots or people ending up on it for maintenance reasons or similar. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
disamig per nom and Thryduulf -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 03:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move to placeholder (computing) without a redirect and then change the target to the dab page. Since opening the RfD, I've come to see the incorrect disambiguator as a problem. I'd !vote delete if the correct version already existed. Nickps (talk) 01:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While there is agreement on the target, there is still debate on whether the redirect should be moved to the uncapitalized version.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Burnie board

Burnie board → Masonite (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
BurnieBoard → Masonite (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No mention of the word "burnie" at the target article. To that effect, there is only one mention of "burnie board" on Wikipedia, which is in the List of buildings designed by architect John Dalton, as the Burnie Board Residence and Administration Building. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the history of the camelcase redirect contains an external link [1] which explains the connection "A 1960s advert for Burnie Board – it appeared in an Australian magazine in 1963. [...] 'Burnie Board' is a type of hardboard or Masonite. The Burnie Paper Mill (1937–2010), Burnie, Tasmania, produced paper, high-grade sawn timber and sheet material like 'Burnie Board'" and multiple other web hits also back up that it was also a type of or similar to masonite, but everything seems to indicate it was a product only or primarily of the 1950s-60s so I would expect most reliable sources to be offline. Thryduulf (talk) 12:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Thryduulf's findings. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Thryduulf. Is "burnished" close enough to "Burnie" that we don't have to add an explicit mention of "Burnie" to the target article? feminist🩸 (talk) 06:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per nom, unless a mention is added to the target. I would support keeping the camelcase redirect if it were an {{R with old history}}, but considering that it was created just a few months ago, then there isn't any valuable history to preserve. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The advert shown in the external link clearly stylises the product name in camelcase, making it a plausible and useful search term. Therefore either both should be kept or both should be deleted. Thryduulf (talk) 12:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Monkeyz and Dolphinz

Monkeyz → Petz#Petz since 2006 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Dolphinz → Petz#Petz since 2006 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Speaking of Petz, both of these redirects target a section that no longer exists. Notably, while the article also no longer mentions either of these by name, both refer to extant titles in the Petz series. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 19:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add: Redirects were made in 2010, both by the same author. The section they pointed to was then deleted in August 2013, due to being, quote, "unsourced commentary." 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 19:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and a quick part 2: I was going to notify the person who removed the section, but they seem to have left Wikipedia according to their talk page. With some rather angry words directed at ArbCom. Hm. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 19:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping, as I wouldn't have remembered that I had created these even if I saw them listed. Though I admit these redirects appear to be rarely used, I think the best thing to do would be to copyedit the article and include the other titles to give a complete picture of the series. The Gameplay section includes Pigz and Bunnyz, so including the other two wouldn't be that out of place (though arguably they could all be moved to a better section that lists the games). I'm unclear why the article would only include what it calls the "Main series" games, but exclude others, particularly when the infobox lists titles that are listed no where else in the article. Based on the existence of Petz: Dogz 2 and Catz 2 and without digging through the history, I suspect the article got confusing or contentious by trying to cover the Petz series without a page for Dogz: Your Computer Pet and Catz: Your Computer Pet, which led to the other animals or games being considered commentary or extraneous. So essentially, I would !vote keep, but to also copyedit the page to expand on games in the series, though I don't want to make those edits while this discussion is inconclusive. —Ost (talk) 00:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, my listing here is mostly due to the 'refined to nonexistent section' issue, and I agree with you that if they were added back to the article (which they should be), these redirects (...redirectz?) need to be kept and refined to wherever in the article they now show up. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification, which may have been in response to my rather detailed reply. I made some edits to the page, including an Animals section, but you may have a better idea for what section should include the content. From what I saw when searching, there may not be a Pigz game, though the animals were in some later Dogz titles. —Ost (talk) 04:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the record: The topic is now mentioned at Petz#Animals. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Central Booking

Central Booking → Baltimore City District Courthouses#Central Booking (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This redirect should probably be deleted. "Central booking" is a generic term which can be and is used to refer to processing centers for arrestees in jurisdictions all over the United States. (I don't know if this applies to elsewhere in the English-speaking world). It certainly does not have a stronger association with Baltimore, Maryland than any other municipality, all of which have their own central booking. If this redirect isn't deleted, it should maybe be targeted to either the prison or arrest article. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 19:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate There also appears to be a song by Lena Hall entitled this along with a 2005 film (mentioned at Al Sapienza and elsewhere). - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

;-;

;-; → List of emoticons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
; ; → Emoticon#Asian style (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
;n; → List of emoticons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Another set of emoticons with unexpectedly different targets. Using semicolons as eyes, but switching the mouth style, does not seem logical to have a difference in topics here, between the list and the general page. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 15:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Refine all to List of emoticons#Eastern. Might as well have the best of both worlds. Alternately, one could make an anchor on the appropriate part of the list and target there, although it's close enough to the top of the Eastern section that it's not hard to find from my suggestion. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

')

') → List of emoticons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
'( → Emoticon (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Another set of two emoticons, and in this case I'm really not seeing why :') would go one way and :'( would go the other. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 15:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Target both to the list, they both show up pretty early there. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

-)

-) → Emoticon (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
-( → Emoticon (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
-/ → List of emoticons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
-\ → Emoticon (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

A handful of emoticons structured like this are targets to either Emoticon or List of emoticons. In this case, these are all have the nose and mouth, although the eyes don't appear for technical reasons (but do at the page). I'm not seeking deletion, but rather that the difference in targets may be unexpected. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 14:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Seems harmless enough, and they do successfully get you where you need to go, even if they look a little ugly while doing it. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Utopes So... you're seeing utility in navigating readers to these two topics, but would prefer for the internal search engine to do that instead of short-circuiting to one of the two? Why? --Joy (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both smiling emoticons, frowning emoticons, and slash emoticons are discussed at both the general emoticon page, and at the list of emoticons page. Among this particular set where the emoticons are structured nearly identically, the difference in targets does not seem expectable. Nothing about ":-/" would make someone think they were going to a list instead of the general page about emoticons. While still ongoing, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 11#XD (Emoticon) has signaled that the overarching list might be a preferable target for individual emoticon redirects. (I'll emphasize in the nomination that I'm not seeking deletion here.) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 15:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I admittedly missed the fact that they were going to different places. I'd point them to the list, as per Utopes. (This would be a Retarget for everything but :-/ ) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Utopes it would be best to actually say where you want to retarget, because this made me think you want to delete them. --Joy (talk) 17:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joy: I didn't, and still don't have a preference on where to retarget these. I indicated in the nomination that -/ and -\ had different targets despite being the same type of emoticon, and was describing this being an issue coupled via subsequent nominations I was planning/setting up when writing this. Your response came before I completed the set. (Meant to say this earlier). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it makes sense to keep them consistent. Why not just WP:be bold and pick one of the two options? :) --Joy (talk) 10:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment These redirect eixst due to technical limitations - specifically page names cannot begin with a colon, leading colons are ignored in search strings (so e.g. "-" and ":-)" lead to exactly the same place) and have a technical meaning in links (e.g. for interwikis) so e.g. -) and -) ([[-)]] and [[:-)]]) lead to the same page. Thryduulf (talk) 19:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firestone (Pern)

Firestone (Pern) → Dragonriders of Pern#Firestone (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in target article, a fictional... rock apparently, from a series of books. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 06:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless better solution found. This, admittedly, is an {{R with history}}-- it was a 2007 era article stub, that was merged into Pern... which itself was BLAR'd at AfD for non-notability. I'd go into the old version of the Pern article to see if anything might be salvagable for re-merging into Dragonriders of Pern, to potentially have a sourced mention of Firestone at the Dragonriders article... but User:Sgeureka, when BLAR'ing the Pern article, also deleted its history?? I didn't even know that that was possible, most BLARs I've seen retain the history...

Given the alternative-- the 2007era stub that was merged into Pern-- was an unsourced stub and thus has little if anything of value, I can't truly recommend keeping. Not that we should have this anyways, per WP:CRUFT... 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 16:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Rohan Bopanna tennis season

2024 Rohan Bopanna tennis season → Rohan Bopanna (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] PrinceofPunjab^TALK 05:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like adding the 2024 season to the main article would be undue weight. But doubles is a bit tricky to gauge as it's not very popular. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak retarget to Rohan Bopanna#2024: Doubles; oldest major champion and world No. 1: seeing as that section of the article talks about his 2024 season. 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 15:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Theme

Flying Theme → E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (soundtrack) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Multiple flying themes exist inside and outside of soundtracks. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (soundtrack) describes a flying theme, The Matrix Reloaded mentions a flying theme, Flying (Taehyung Theme) exists as a redirect to BTS World: Original Soundtrack, as well as any other theme that plays while flying. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to a disambiguation page (yet to be created) consisting of the aforementioned pages. _signed,Pat ^talk 01:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After some thinking, I think having this Retarget to a disambiguation page wouldn't hurt. Okmrman (talk) 04:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this should retarget to the dab page-- I think this should BE the dab page. Dabify. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 11:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Waterfalls

Jason Waterfalls → Waterfalls (TLC song) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nobody named "Jason" is mentioned at the target page of this R from catchphrase redirect. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - For what it's worth, this is a pretty common/notorious misunderstanding of the songs name/chorus. Sergecross73 msg me 01:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Chasing" is also not mentioned at the target, which I would've expected Chasing Waterfalls more if anything. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that is surprising. It's part of the chorus and central to the concept of the song, so it seems like it could pretty easily be included. Sergecross73 msg me 01:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 03:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like a Jelly Baby?

Would you like a Jelly Baby? → Fourth Doctor (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

An R from catchphrase not mentioned at the target article, not a likely search term for the Fourth Doctor. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. I am EXCEEDINGLY surprised that that catchphrase ISN'T mentioned in the target article, given how ingrained said catchphrase is to the Fourth Doctor's character-- it's as Fourth Doctor as his scarf. If someone were to add it to the article, I don't think I'd support deletion anymore. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep {{R from quote}} / {{R from search term}} / {{R without mention}}, the iconic catchphrase from Tom Baker's version. It already appears at wikiquote:Fourth Doctor which is already linked to from our article -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 03:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete per first reply Okmrman (talk) 03:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the one who knocks!

I am the one who knocks! → Walter White (Breaking Bad) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

An R from catchphrase that is not listed at the target article. Creator banned for sockpuppetry has had similar deleted catchphrase redirects in the past. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep {{R from quote}} / {{R from search term}} / {{R without mention}} -- the iconic catchphrase for this character, which is featured in several memes. It appears at wikiquote:Breaking Bad (season 4), so a link to wikiquote:Breaking Bad should be added to the article -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 04:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think we generally link to WikiQuote like that, and even if we did, I don't know how we'd include that naturally with encyclopedic content... Sergecross73 msg me 00:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just add a WikiQuote linkbox to the see also or external links section -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 08:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unless you literally plaster "I am the one who knocks" at the bottom of the page, it's not going to satisfy our redirect standards. And as you've likely noticed, we don't have quote collections at the bottom of fictional character articles. Sergecross73 msg me 16:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per comments above, I can't imagine implementing this into the article in a meaningful, necessary way. Sergecross73 msg me 18:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. most people who even have the slightest clue about what breaking bad even is would probably already know what his name is and those who don't won't even really remember that he said that. Okmrman (talk) 03:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cox's Bazar iconic railway station

Cox's Bazar iconic railway station → Cox's Bazar railway station (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Unnecessary editorializing. Rusalkii (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 04:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Mehedi Abedin 11:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's dangerous to go alone!

It's dangerous to go alone! → The Legend of Zelda (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

There is not really any mention of this quote on the actual page for the Zelda franchise and I doubt this quote is even notable enough to get mentioned on the Zelda franchise page anyways. Okmrman (talk) 03:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - its a famous phrase from the game. Reliable sources comment on it, and it would be easy to mention in some sort of Legacy/Impact type section. See Eurogamer or TheGamer discuss it. Sergecross73 msg me 14:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Retarget to The Legend of Zelda (video game): Sergecross73 already discussed notability. However, this quote is from the original NES game (and is currently mentioned in the The Legend of Zelda (video game) article), so it makes more sense for it to redirect to the actual source of the quote. 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 15:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget as per HotMess, tag as {{template:R from quotation}}. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 16:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 -->
 <!-- Add new entries directly below this line. -->
+====Medical-grade silicon====
+*<span id="Medical-grade silicon">{{no redirect|1 = Medical-grade silicon }}</span> → [[:Silicon]] <span>&nbsp;<span class="plainlinks lx">([[Talk:Medical-grade silicon|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Medical-grade silicon|links]] <b>·</b> [[Special:PageHistory/Medical-grade silicon|history]] <b>·</b> [[:toolforge:pageviews/?start=2024-03-01&end=2024-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Medical-grade_silicon|stats]])</span></span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<small class="plainlinks"><nowiki>[</nowiki>&nbsp;Closure:&nbsp;''{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Medical-grade silicon|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Medical-grade silicon]] closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Medical-grade silicon|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Medical-grade silicon]] closed as retarget}}}} retarget]<span class="sysop-show">/[{{fullurl:Medical-grade silicon|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Medical-grade silicon]] closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]</span>}}''&nbsp;]</small>&nbsp;
+I accidentally mistyped "silicone". I moved the redirect to [[Medical-grade silicone]] but of course that left a redirect. Medical-grade [[silicon]] is presumably a thing, but I think anyone searching for it is more likely to want [[medical-grade silicone]]; I'm not the only one to make this typo, it's quite common, and some people also don't know the difference.
+I request discussion; I don't know what outcome would be best. Should this redir be a disambiguation page? Deleted? Redirected as a misspelling, or a a topic in its own right? [[User:HLHJ|HLHJ]] ([[User talk:HLHJ|talk]]) 16:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 ====Style (EP)====
 *<span id="Style (EP)">{{no redirect|1 = Style (EP) }}</span> → [[:Style (Super Junior-D&E album)]] <span>&nbsp;<span class="plainlinks lx">([[Talk:Style (EP)|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Style (EP)|links]] <b>·</b> [[Special:PageHistory/Style (EP)|history]] <b>·</b> [[:toolforge:pageviews/?start=2024-02-09&end=2024-03-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Style_(EP)|stats]])</span></span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<small class="plainlinks"><nowiki>[</nowiki>&nbsp;Closure:&nbsp;''{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Style (EP)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Style (EP)]] closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Style (EP)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Style (EP)]] closed as retarget}}}} retarget]<span class="sysop-show">/[{{fullurl:Style (EP)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Style (EP)]] closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]</span>}}''&nbsp;]</small>&nbsp;