Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 February 27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OlEnglish (talk | contribs) at 01:48, 1 March 2024 (→‎Template:Mop). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

February 27

Template:User grieving

Propose merging Template:User grieving with Template:User Grieving short.
No need for two templates (the short form, currently unused, is a recent fork); make the message switchable by using |short=y, or similar, if needed. Or simply delete the short version? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and add parameter per nom. —Matrix(!) (a good person!)[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] 15:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep in whatever fashion works best. I've seen this userbox in use before but it's not going to be a permanent addition to anyone's User page. The only way I think these two should be deleted is if they are redundant to other, similar template messages. But if that's not true, then I argue that we keep these and allow editors to signal when they are under duress. I don't think they are likely to be misused. Liz Read! Talk! 07:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support merging and adding parameter. Frostly (talk) 22:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, having more customisable templates like this instead of forking them is generally better in my opinion because it's all in one template. But I don't see any issue if this doesn't get merged. Theooolone (talk) 02:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

merging and adding parameter This is a template the should not be in use at all, but unfortunately that is not how life works. The Banner talk 01:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uw meta templates

Propose merging Template:Uw4im, Template:Uw4, Template:Uw3 and Template:Uw2 with Template:Uw.
Consolidation, standardization of messaging for a given policy/guideline violation. We can have the template output be different depending on the level of the warning (block, 4im, 4, 3, 2, 1).

As an example, we could have the uw-disrupt series have code that looks like this with a merge:

{{Uw
|level={{{level|}}}
|softreason=be unconstructive
|reason=disrupt Wikipedia
|details=
* If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1|}}}|{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>TALKPAGENAME:{{{1}}}}}|Help:Talk pages}}|article's talk page]], and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution#Ask for help at a relevant noticeboard|relevant noticeboards]].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
}}

The output can then be standardized based on the level. Awesome Aasim 21:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nomination. 209.151.151.155 (talk) 04:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC) – sock vote struck NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FCPtopic

The effort behind this seems to have stalled soon after it launched, its last meaningful update was in 2006, and is since covered by Wikipedia:Translation. DB1729talk 23:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mop

Propose merging Template:Mop with Template:Icon.
This template is a 16x16px admin mop icon, primarily used on Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. I propose merging it into Module:Icon/data (with the code admin & the alias mop - or the other way around), both for consistency - to have Wikipedia-related icons accessible from one template - and because it meets the scope at {{icon/doc}} as an inline image that is used in metapages. After merging, I propose turning {{mop}} into a wrapper template for {{icon|mop}} as the functional equivalent of an {{R from move}}; given the length of time a template at this name has existed and been used for, and given how many times it's called at WP:MWP.

Let me know if there are any queries. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 22:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge. All seem like worthwhile proposals to me. As the original creator of mop icon, no objections here, as long as it still functions as intended at WP:MWP with no accessibility issues for people with screen readers, then go for it. -- œ

Template:Indigo Moss

No notable albums or singles. Only bluelinks were "related", but were too tangential for inclusion. --woodensuperman 14:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Veronica Falls

One album, two singles. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 14:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Royworld

Only one album. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 14:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cincinnati Bengals retired numbers

Only one article linked. WP:NENAN. I don't believe this a suitable for a topic for a navbox anyway. --woodensuperman 13:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Carolina Panthers retired numbers

Only one article linked!!! WP:NENAN. I don't believe this a suitable for a topic for a navbox anyway. --woodensuperman 13:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New Orleans Saints retired numbers

Only two articles linked. WP:NENAN. I don't believe this a suitable for a topic for a navbox anyway. --woodensuperman 13:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dolphins retired numbers

Only three articles linked. WP:NENAN. I don't believe this a suitable for a topic for a navbox anyway. --woodensuperman 13:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: I think it's a suitable topic and useful navbox that has potential to eventually grow. I believe 3 entries to be enough in this case. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:NENAN suggests a "rule of five". --woodensuperman 15:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I am aware that the essay suggests a rule of five. I sometimes agree with that premise but not in this instance. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Buffalo Bills retired numbers

Only three articles linked. WP:NENAN. I don't believe this a suitable for a topic for a navbox anyway. --woodensuperman 13:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: I think it's a suitable topic and useful navbox that has potential to eventually grow. I believe 3 entries to be enough in this case. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:NENAN suggests a "rule of five". --woodensuperman 15:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I am aware that the essay suggests a rule of five. I sometimes agree with that premise but not in this instance. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sonamoo

Useless, all links redirect to main article. --woodensuperman 10:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GRTCPulse

With all bus stops recently redirected to the main article or DAB-pages, there er not enough valid links left to navigate between. WP:NENAN The Banner talk 08:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This isn't a navigation template; it's a one-use routemap. Not the same situation as {{GRTC}}. Mackensen (talk) 12:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Mackensen. Routemaps are just that - maps - and aren't primarily for navigation between articles. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • So it would make sense to unlink all the non-notable bus stops? The Banner talk 20:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Probably, though consensus can change, and that decision is out of scope for this discussion. Mackensen (talk) 02:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GRTC

With all bus stops recently redirected to the main article or DAB-pages, there er not enough valid links left to navigate between. WP:NENAN The Banner talk 08:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Atlanta Falcons retired numbers

This template misrepresents the reality of the situation. Per the Atlanta Falcons, "The Atlanta Falcons organization doesn't officially retire jersey numbers, but considers certain player's jerseys worthy of being honored. The Falcons Ring of Honor honors individual players and not jerseys."[1] Hey man im josh (talk) 00:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]