Starship HLS
Manufacturer | SpaceX |
---|---|
Country of origin | United States |
Operator | SpaceX |
Applications | Crewed reusable lunar lander |
Specifications | |
Launch mass | ~1,320 t (2,910,000 lb) |
Regime | Cislunar space |
Dimensions | |
Length | 50 m (164 ft 1 in) |
Width | 9 m (29 ft 6 in) |
Capacity | |
Payload to Moon | |
Mass | 100–200 t (220,000–440,000 lb)[1]: 17:40 |
Production | |
Status | In development |
Maiden launch | NET 2023 |
Powered by | Raptor, RCS thruster bank |
Propellant | CH4 / LOX |
Starship HLS, or Starship Human Landing System, is a lunar lander variant of the Starship spacecraft that will transfer astronauts from a lunar orbit to the surface of the Moon and back. It is being designed and built by SpaceX under contract to NASA as a critical element of NASA's Artemis program to land a crew on the Moon in the 2020s.
The mission plan calls for a Super Heavy booster to launch a Starship HLS into an Earth orbit, where it will be refueled by multiple Starship tanker spacecraft before boosting itself into a lunar near-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO). There, it will rendezvous with a crewed Orion spacecraft that will be launched from Earth by a NASA Space Launch System (SLS) launcher. A crew will transfer from Orion to HLS, which will descend to the lunar surface for a stay of several days which is to include five or more EVAs. It will then return the crew to Orion in NRHO.
In the third phase of its HLS procurement process NASA awarded SpaceX a contract in April 2021 to develop, produce, and demonstrate Starship HLS. A crewed flight will occur as part of the Artemis 3 mission, no earlier than April 2025, after an earlier uncrewed test flight successfully lands on the Moon and returns to NRHO.
On 23 March 2022, NASA announced its intention to procure a second crewed Starship HLS demonstration mission to the Moon, with the HLS design updated to meet new sustainability requirements. NASA intends to negotiate a sole-source award to SpaceX by exercising an option under the 2021 HLS contract. The updated Starship HLS would be used for the Artemis V mission and would compete with landers to be procured from other vendors for later landings.[2]
Design
Starship HLS is a variant of SpaceX's Starship spacecraft optimized to operate on and around the Moon. In contrast to the Starship spacecraft from which it derives, Starship HLS will never reenter an atmosphere, so it does not have a heat shield or flight control surfaces. In contrast to other HLS designs that proposed multiple stages, the entire spacecraft will land on the Moon and will then launch from the Moon. Like other Starship variants, Starship HLS has six Raptor engines mounted at the tail which are used when the Starship HLS acts as the second stage during the launch from Earth. They are also used as its primary propulsion system in all other flight phases. Within 100 meters of the lunar surface, the variant will utilize high‑thrust RCS thrusters located mid‑body to avoid plume impingement problems with the lunar regolith. The thrusters burn gaseous oxygen and methane instead of the liquid oxygen and methane used by the Raptors.[3][4]: 50:30 However, these thrusters may not be needed.[5] Starship HLS is supplied with electrical power by a band of solar panels around the circumference of the vehicle.[citation needed]
Starship HLS requires in-orbit propellant transfer in its mission profile. Prior to the launch of the HLS vehicle from Earth, a Starship variant configured as a propellant depot would be launched into an Earth orbit and then partially or fully filled by between four and fourteen[a] Starship tanker flights carrying propellant.[6] The Starship HLS vehicle would then launch and rendezvous with the already-loaded propellant depot and refuel before transiting from Earth orbit to Lunar orbit.[7]
Starship HLS incorporates the following design characteristics:[7]
- approximately 24 midbody oxygen-methane thrusters for use very near the lunar surface
- 100-day loiter capability in lunar orbit
- lunar downmass of more than 100 t, far exceeding NASA requirement of less than 2 t.
- lunar upmass of more than 100 t, far exceeding NASA requirement of less than 1 t.
- support for a greater number of EVAs on the lunar surface than the minimum required by NASA in the 2020 solicitation
- excess-propellant margin can be applied to expedite an emergency ascent from the Moon
Within the Artemis lunar landing architecture as of April 2021[update],[7] a NASA Orion spacecraft is planned to be launched by a Space Launch System rocket and rendezvous with a waiting Starship HLS lander in a near-rectilinear halo orbit around the Moon. The crew of Orion would then dock with, and transfer to Starship HLS, which would subsequently depart and descend to the lunar surface. After lunar surface operations, Starship HLS will lift-off from the Moon and return to lunar orbit to rendezvous with Orion. The crew then transfers back to Orion and departs for Earth. Although not confirmed yet, Starship HLS could, in theory, be refueled in orbit to carry more crews and cargo to the surface.[8][9]
History
Starship HLS builds on the SpaceX Starship system by adding a new spacecraft variant called Starship HLS. This spacecraft will be used in conjunction with the Starship booster (called Super Heavy) and two additional Starship spacecraft variants, "tanker" and "depot", that were already being planned prior to the HLS contract.
Starship system history
The SpaceX Starship design was initially conceived in the early 2010s as a spacecraft that would be principally built for the Mars colonization effort that SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has advocated since 2011,[10] with the first colonists arriving no earlier than the middle of the 2020s.[11]
By 2016, the scope became somewhat broader, when Musk realized the high-level design SpaceX had been working on for the Starship vehicle allowed for variants that would be suitable for interplanetary travel more generally, and could work both on planets with and without an atmosphere.[12] Lunar destination flights, however, were not generally emphasized by Musk, and he specifically stated that the Moon was not a necessary step on the path to Mars.[13][14]
By late 2018, SpaceX had specified the primary construction material for Starship to be stainless steel[15] – after approximately a year of building manufacturing pathfinder hardware out of carbon composite materials—and manufacture of the initial test article including pressure vessel construction for the liquid methane and liquid oxygen tanks began in early 2019.[16]
Between July 2019 and July 2021, seven Starship prototype vehicles, each with different vehicle design configurations and varied test objectives, flew a total of eight atmospheric test flights, all launched from the SpaceX South Texas launch site at Boca Chica, Texas.[17]
Starship HLS history
Starship itself has been in privately-funded development by SpaceX since the mid-2010s, but the HLS (Human Landing System) variant is being developed under contracts with the United States' National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The initial contracted design work started in May 2020, with selection and funding for full-development occurring in April 2021, when Starship HLS was selected by NASA to land "the first woman and the next man" on the Moon during the Artemis 3 mission, potentially as early as 2024.
NASA signed a US$2.89 billion contract with SpaceX to develop and manufacture Starship HLS,[18] and to conduct two flights – an uncrewed demonstration mission, and a crewed lunar landing.[19][7] Starship HLS is intended to dock in a NRHO lunar orbit with either the NASA Orion spacecraft or NASA lunar Gateway space station, in order to take on passengers before descending to the lunar surface and return them after ascent. NASA is conducting a competitive procurement process for HLS systems for later Artemis missions, and Starship HLS will be a contender.
Starship HLS, with HLS being an initialism for Human Landing System, was first made public when it was initially selected by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in April 2020 for a design study as part of their Artemis program, which aims to land humans on the Moon. SpaceX was one of three teams selected to develop competing lunar lander designs for the Artemis program over a year-long[20] period starting in May 2020.[20] The other landers in consideration were Dynetics HLS, developed by aerospace manufacturer Dynetics, and the Integrated Lander Vehicle, developed by a team led by Blue Origin.[8] NASA intended to later select and fund at most two of these landers to continue to initial demonstration flights.[21][9]
On 16 April 2021, NASA selected only Starship HLS for crewed lunar lander development[18] plus two lunar demonstration flights – one uncrewed and one crewed – no earlier than 2024. The contract is valued at US$2.89 billion over a number of years.[19][7] Two NASA Artemis astronauts are to land on the first crewed Starship HLS landing.[22] NASA had previously stated that it preferred to fund development of multiple Human Landing System proposals with dissimilar capabilities; however, "only one design was selected for an initial uncrewed demonstration and the first crewed landing, due to significant budget constraints" for the human landing system program imposed by US Congress. NASA stated that the unselected proposals – Dynetics HLS and Blue Origin ILV – as well as landers from other companies would be eligible for later lunar landing contracts.[7]
On 26 April 2021, Blue Origin and Dynetics separately protested the award to SpaceX at the US Government Accountability Office (GAO).[23] On 30 July 2021, the GAO rejected the protests and found that "NASA did not violate procurement law" in awarding the contract to SpaceX, who bid a much lower cost and more capable human and cargo lunar landing capability for NASA Artemis.[23][24] Soon after GAO rejected the appeal, NASA made the initial $300 million contract payment to SpaceX.[25] The protest action delayed NASA from authorizing work on the contract, and thus delayed the start of work by SpaceX for 95 days.[26]
On 13 August 2021,[27] Blue Origin filed a lawsuit in the US Court of Federal Claims challenging "NASA’'s unlawful and improper evaluation of proposals".[26][28] Blue Origin asked the court for an injunction to halt further spending by NASA on the existing contract with SpaceX,[29] and NASA stopped work on the contract on 19 August, after SpaceX had been allowed to work on the NASA-specific parts of Starship HLS for just three weeks since the work had been previously halted in April.[27] Reactions to the lawsuit were negative, with many criticizing Blue Origin for causing unnecessary delays to the Artemis program.[30][31][32] On 4 November, the court granted the federal government's motion to dismiss the case,[33][34] and NASA announced that it would resume work with SpaceX as soon as possible.[35]
On 23 March 2022, NASA announced it would be exercising an option under the initial SpaceX HLS contract that would allow a second-generation Starship HLS design to conduct a demonstration mission after Artemis 3.[2]
Notes
- ^ In the documentation of SpaceX's HLS bid, a conservative figure of 14 tanker flights is used. Musk has stated that with a tanker payload mass of 150 tons, four to eight tanker flights would be necessary, depending on the payload mass on Starship HLS itself and the intended fuel load (since the mission profile may allow for a less than full tank).
References
- ^ Elon Musk and Peter Diamandis LIVE on $100M XPRIZE Carbon Removal, archived from the original on 22 April 2021, retrieved 22 April 2021
- ^ a b McGuinness, Jackie; Russell, Jimi; Sudnik, Janet; Potter, Sean (23 March 2022). "NASA Provides Update to Astronaut Moon Lander Plans Under Artemis". NASA. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
- ^ Cummings, Nick (11 June 2020). Human Landing System: Putting Boots Back on the Moon. American Astronautical Society. Event occurs at 35:00–36:02. Retrieved 12 June 2020 – via YouTube.
... for the terminal descent of Starship, a few tens of meters before we touch down on the lunar surface, we actually use a high-thrust RCS system, so that we don't impinge on the surface of the Moon with the high-thrust Raptor engines. ... uses the same methane and oxygen propellants as Raptor.
- ^ Musk, Elon. "Forward thrusters are to stabilize ship when landing in high winds. If goal is max payload to Moon per ship, no heatshield or flaps or big gas thruster packs are needed. No need to bring early ships back. They can serve as part of Moon base alpha". twitter.com. Archived from the original on 2 September 2020.
- ^ Sesnic, Trevor (11 August 2021). "Starbase Tour and Interview with Elon Musk". Everyday Astronaut. Archived from the original on 12 August 2021. Retrieved 12 October 2021.
- ^ @elonmusk (11 August 2021). "16 flights is extremely unlikely. Starship payload to orbit is ~150 tons , so max of 8 to fill 1200 ton tanks of lunar Starship. Without flaps & heat shield, Starship is much lighter. Lunar landing legs don't add much (1/6 gravity). May only need 1/2 full, ie 4 tanker flights" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- ^ a b c d e f Burghardt, Thomas (20 April 2021). "After NASA taps SpaceX's Starship for first Artemis landings, agency looks to on-ramp future vehicles". NASASpaceflight.com. Archived from the original on 20 April 2021. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
- ^ a b "NASA Selects Blue Origin, Dynetics, and SpaceX Human Landers for Artemis". NASASpaceFlight.com. 1 May 2020. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
- ^ a b Potter, Sean (30 April 2020). "NASA Names Companies to Develop Human Landers for Artemis Missions". NASA. Archived from the original on 11 May 2020. Retrieved 15 May 2020. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- ^ "Elon Musk: I'll Put a Man on Mars in 10 Years". Market Watch. New York: The Wall Street Journal. 22 April 2011. Archived from the original on 1 December 2011. Retrieved 1 December 2011.
- ^ "Huge Mars Colony Eyed by SpaceX Founder". Discovery News. 13 December 2012. Archived from the original on 15 November 2014. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
- ^ Berger, Eric (18 September 2016). "Elon Musk scales up his ambitions, considering going 'well beyond' Mars". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 20 September 2016. Retrieved 19 September 2016.
- ^ Knapp, Alex. "SpaceX Billionaire Elon Musk On The Business And Future Of Space Travel". Forbes. Archived from the original on 24 April 2021. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
- ^ "Elon Musk on the future of space travel and exploration". Marketplace. Minnesota Public Radio. 8 July 2011. Archived from the original on 23 April 2021. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
- ^ D'Agostino, Ryan (22 January 2019). "Elon Musk: Why I'm Building the Starship out of Stainless Steel". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on 22 January 2019. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
- ^ Ralph, Eric (9 March 2019). "SpaceX's Starship prototype moved to launch pad on new rocket transporter". Teslarati. Archived from the original on 6 January 2020. Retrieved 22 March 2019.
- ^ "Starship SN8 12.5-Kilometer hop". Everyday Astronaut. Archived from the original on 28 January 2021. Retrieved 5 December 2020.
- ^ a b Foust, Jeff (16 April 2021). "NASA selects SpaceX to develop crewed lunar lander". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on 21 May 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- ^ a b Berger, Eric (16 April 2021). "NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander – 'We looked at what's the best value to the government'". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 17 April 2021.
- ^ a b NextSTEP H: Human Landing System Archived 8 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine, NASA, 27 January 2021, retrieved 31 January 2021.
- ^ "SpaceX, Blue Origin and Dynetics will build human lunar landers for NASA's next trip back to the Moon". techcrunch.com. Archived from the original on 2 September 2020. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
- ^ Brown, Katherine (16 April 2021). "As Artemis Moves Forward, NASA Picks SpaceX to Land Next Americans on Moon". NASA.gov. Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 16 April 2021.
- ^ a b Foust, Jeff (30 July 2021). "GAO denies Blue Origin and Dynetics protests of NASA lunar lander contract". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 2 August 2021.
- ^ "Statement on Blue Origin-Dynetics Decision". 30 July 2021. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
- ^ "Despite Of Competitor Protests NASA Pays SpaceX $300 Million To Continue Developing A Starship Lunar Lander". 14 August 2021. Archived from the original on 16 August 2021. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
- ^ a b "Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin sues NASA, escalating its fight for a Moon lander contract". The Verge. 16 August 2021. Archived from the original on 16 August 2021. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
protest prevented SpaceX from starting its contract for 95 days while the GAO adjudicated the case.
- ^ a b Foust, Jeff (19 August 2021). "Blue Origin suit stops work on NASA HLS contract with SpaceX". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 20 August 2021.
- ^ Sheetz, Michael (16 August 2021). "Bezos' Blue Origin takes NASA to federal court over award of lunar lander contract to SpaceX". CNBC. Archived from the original on 16 August 2021. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 17 August 2021. Retrieved 18 August 2021.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Berger, Eric (16 August 2021). "Here's why Blue Origin thinks it is justified in continuing to protest NASA". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 18 August 2021. Retrieved 18 August 2021.
- ^ Sheetz, Michael (20 August 2021). "Top talent departs Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin as NASA lander fight escalates". CNBC. Archived from the original on 20 August 2021. Retrieved 21 August 2021.
- ^ Mack, Eric. "Blue Origin lawsuit halts NASA's Artemis work with SpaceX". CNET. Archived from the original on 14 September 2021. Retrieved 14 September 2021.
- ^ Sheetz, Michael (4 November 2021). "Bezos' Blue Origin loses NASA lawsuit over SpaceX $2.9 billion lunar lander contract". CNBC. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
- ^ Wall, Mike (4 November 2021). "Blue Origin loses federal lawsuit over NASA moon lander contract". Space.com. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
- ^ Margetta, Robert (4 November 2021). "NASA Statement on Artemis Lunar Lander Court Decision". NASA. Retrieved 4 November 2021.